Re: [onap-discuss] [onap-tsc] [modeling] TOSCA BPMNsupportproposal at OASIS TOSCA WG

2017-05-15 Thread Nati Shalom
Hi Huabing I'l let Michael respond directly to your questions but i wanted to make it clear that no one in this discussion is suggesting that theres one way to implement TOSCA orchestration and that it has to be declarative. The specific questions that were trying to get answered repetitively

Re: [onap-discuss] [onap-tsc] [modeling] TOSCA BPMN supportproposal at OASIS TOSCA WG

2017-05-12 Thread Nati Shalom
Zhaoxing Thanks for your response! I share your concern that we have to be practical here and get things done. I also agree with the principal that we don't want to come up with a proposal that will take a lot of time to implement and therefore become impractical. If i summarize your and Ran

Re: [onap-discuss] [onap-tsc] [modeling] TOSCA BPMN support proposal at OASIS TOSCA WG

2017-05-11 Thread Nati Shalom
"The proposal has been discussed in the OASIS TOSCA for a couple of weeks and most of the members agreed on it except the strong pushback from Michael of Gigaspaces." Huabing et al I wanted to ask that we will keep the discussion on a professional and not a personal level. First i want to

[onap-discuss] Modelling discussion on Friday May 5th

2017-04-26 Thread Nati Shalom
they will discuss > > 1) OPENCOMP Workflow > > 2) OPEN-O Workflow. > > > > Best regards, > > > > DENG Hui > > > > *From:* Michael Brenner [mailto:michael at gigaspaces.com] > *Sent:* Friday, April 21, 2017 7:14 AM > *To:* Amir Lev