Re: [onap-discuss] [dcae][holmes] Instantiation of DCAE-Holmes

2017-08-30 Thread JI, LUSHENG (LUSHENG)
Guangrong,

Thanks for the clarification.

As for deployment of Holmes we can do it both ways.  From DCAE perspective, for 
deploying any service component, DCAE is just waiting for its Deployment 
Handler API being called, along with this call also expected is a blueprint 
that describes what to deploy and how. CLAMP calls this API, but the same API 
can also be invoked by other means to control service components.

If for example Holmes is to be deployed independent of any close loop, we can 
have an “initialization” blueprint that includes Holmes, and this is called by 
a script after the DCAE platform components are up and running, not by CLAMP.  
And when the CLAMP is calling DCAE to deploy service components for a control 
loop which uses Holmes, we need to make sure its blueprint does not include 
Holmes instantiation.

I think that is what we have been saying how we want to deploy Holmes, and it 
appears to be aligned with what you are saying too.  Well even if you want to 
change the approach in future, the difference is not huge in terms of support 
from DCAE platform, just needing different blueprints.

Hope this helps,
Lusheng








From: "fu.guangr...@zte.com.cn" <fu.guangr...@zte.com.cn>
Date: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 at 12:39 AM
To: "JI, LUSHENG (LUSHENG)" <l...@research.att.com>
Cc: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org" <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>, 
"tian.shi...@zte.com.cn" <tian.shi...@zte.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [dcae][holmes] Instantiation of DCAE-Holmes


Lusheng,



Sorry for the confusion. I mean there is supposed to be only on instance for 
Holmes duing the run time.



The reason why I'm asking is that I want to keep us on the same page. Actually 
it was not clear to me when Holmes is going to be spun up. Right after DCAE is 
instantiated or when a control loop is distributed by CLAMP. If it's the 
formrer one, everything would be okay. Otherwise we have to consider to shift 
that to an earlier phase.



I hope I've made myself clear.



Regards,

Guangrong






Original Mail
Sender:  <l...@research.att.com>;
To: FuGuangRong10144542;
CC:  <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>;tianshiwei10223543;
Date: 2017/08/30 12:31
Subject: Re: [dcae][holmes] Instantiation of DCAE-Holmes


Guangrong,

Sorry I do not know what you mean by "singleton" mode.  Please clarify.

Also DCAEGEN2 platform has been planning to deploy Holmes as a DCAE service 
component.  I do not understand why you need to worry about when to spin up.

Lusheng

Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S7, an AT 4G LTE smartphone


 Original message 
From: fu.guangr...@zte.com.cn
Date: 8/29/17 11:31 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: "JI, LUSHENG (LUSHENG)" <l...@research.att.com>
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org, tian.shi...@zte.com.cn
Subject: [dcae][holmes] Instantiation of DCAE-Holmes


Lusheng,



As you know, in the Amsterdam release, Holmes is going to be running in a 
singleton mode. All the control loops are differentiated and processed by 
different rules (not by the service instance, which I think is the probable 
implementation of the string matcher).  Thus we hope Holmes to be spun up right 
after DCAE is started (like the platform services of DCAE). What do we need to 
do for this?



Regards,

Guangrong












___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss


Re: [onap-discuss] [dcae][holmes] Instantiation of DCAE-Holmes

2017-08-29 Thread fu.guangrong
Lusheng,




Sorry for the confusion. I mean there is supposed to be only on instance for 
Holmes duing the run time.




The reason why I'm asking is that I want to keep us on the same page. Actually 
it was not clear to me when Holmes is going to be spun up. Right after DCAE is 
instantiated or when a control loop is distributed by CLAMP. If it's the 
formrer one, everything would be okay. Otherwise we have to consider to shift 
that to an earlier phase. 




I hope I've made myself clear.




Regards,

Guangrong

















Original Mail



Sender:  <l...@research.att.com>
To: FuGuangRong10144542
CC:  <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>tianshiwei10223543
Date: 2017/08/30 12:31
Subject: Re: [dcae][holmes] Instantiation of DCAE-Holmes





Guangrong,

 
Sorry I do not know what you mean by "singleton" mode.  Please clarify.  

 
Also DCAEGEN2 platform has been planning to deploy Holmes as a DCAE service 
component.  I do not understand why you need to worry about when to spin up.  

 
Lusheng

 


Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S7, an AT 4G LTE smartphone


 

 
 Original message 
From: fu.guangr...@zte.com.cn
Date: 8/29/17 11:31 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: "JI, LUSHENG (LUSHENG)" <l...@research.att.com>
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org, tian.shi...@zte.com.cn
Subject: [dcae][holmes] Instantiation of DCAE-Holmes

 


Lusheng,


 

As you know, in the Amsterdam release, Holmes is going to be running in a 
singleton mode. All the control loops are differentiated and processed by 
different rules (not by the service instance, which I think is the probable 
implementation of the string matcher).  Thus we hope Holmes to be spun up right 
after DCAE is started (like the platform services of DCAE). What do we need to 
do for this?


 

Regards,

Guangrong___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss


Re: [onap-discuss] [dcae][holmes] Instantiation of DCAE-Holmes

2017-08-29 Thread JI, LUSHENG (LUSHENG)
Guangrong,

Sorry I do not know what you mean by "singleton" mode.  Please clarify.

Also DCAEGEN2 platform has been planning to deploy Holmes as a DCAE service 
component.  I do not understand why you need to worry about when to spin up.

Lusheng

Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S7, an AT 4G LTE smartphone


 Original message 
From: fu.guangr...@zte.com.cn
Date: 8/29/17 11:31 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: "JI, LUSHENG (LUSHENG)" <l...@research.att.com>
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org, tian.shi...@zte.com.cn
Subject: [dcae][holmes] Instantiation of DCAE-Holmes


Lusheng,


As you know, in the Amsterdam release, Holmes is going to be running in a 
singleton mode. All the control loops are differentiated and processed by 
different rules (not by the service instance, which I think is the probable 
implementation of the string matcher). Thus we hope Holmes to be spun up right 
after DCAE is started (like the platform services of DCAE). What do we need to 
do for this?


Regards,

Guangrong




___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss


[onap-discuss] [dcae][holmes] Instantiation of DCAE-Holmes

2017-08-29 Thread fu.guangrong
Lusheng,




As you know, in the Amsterdam release, Holmes is going to be running in a 
singleton mode. All the control loops are differentiated and processed by 
different rules (not by the service instance, which I think is the probable 
implementation of the string matcher). Thus we hope Holmes to be spun up right 
after DCAE is started (like the platform services of DCAE). What do we need to 
do for this?




Regards,

Guangrong___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss