Re: [onap-discuss] RTD and wiki

2018-06-17 Thread Frank Sandoval
Thanks very much for the quick and comprehensive reply Greg. Where there appears to be duplication, for example an architecture description, should the RTD be taken as the source of truth, as its been formally approved? If so, should there be a background effort to remove duplicate content from

Re: [onap-discuss] RTD and wiki

2018-06-14 Thread GLOVER, GREG L
Thanks Frank, Great question, I’ve copied ONAP discuss list since the answer pertains to all ONAP documentation: Wiki: Is for informal content. That would include general community interest (welcome, membership, announcements, meetings), and project work in progress (e.g. team members, new