Re: [onap-discuss] quick question on vFW demo

2018-04-25 Thread Joe Kidder
Brian and Daniel,
Thanks gents!  That seems to work much better.
Joe

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 4:15 PM, ROSE, DANIEL V <dr6...@att.com> wrote:

> Yes the code in the demo repo that marco wrote assumed the old way of
> naming before systemd changed things. 1404 should let things work
>
>
>
> Daniel Rose
>
> ECOMP / ONAP
>
> com.att.ecomp
>
> 732-420-7308
>
>
>
> *From:* onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss-bounces@
> lists.onap.org] *On Behalf Of *FREEMAN, BRIAN D
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 25, 2018 4:07 PM
> *To:* Joe Kidder <joe.kid...@5thlayer.com>; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
> *Subject:* Re: [onap-discuss] quick question on vFW demo
>
>
>
> Security Advisory:* This Message Originated Outside of AT ***
> Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.
>
> I think it should be the Ubuntu 14.04 image for the vFW demo.
>
>
>
> Brian
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org <onap-discuss-bounces@lists.
> onap.org> *On Behalf Of *Joe Kidder
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 25, 2018 3:47 PM
> *To:* onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
> *Subject:* [onap-discuss] quick question on vFW demo
>
>
>
> When I launch the vFW demo heat template (from Amsterdam, I believe), the
> ubuntu 16.04 image that I have installed on OpenStack (grabbed from
> http://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/xenial/current/
> xenial-server-cloudimg-amd64-disk
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__cloud-2Dimages.ubuntu.com_xenial_current_xenial-2Dserver-2Dcloudimg-2Damd64-2Ddisk=DwMFaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=e3d1ehx3DI5AoMgDmi2Fzw=1e5LECa3kcHh89TxJXaUYpkcrq3HzmcBCWk1cZwJwts=ojLHaTDvuP6-Mj_VT-0Nhpq7Gt_HpsJEoFhZ0mBbhBM=>
> 1.img) has ethernet interfaces named "ens3", "ens4", "ens5".
>
>
>
> However, the v_sink_install.sh, for example, tries to perform actions on
> eth1 and eth2 (skipping eth0, as it's not interesting other than providing
> a path to the internet).
>
>
>
> Am I missing a step?
>
>
>
> Should I have massaged my ubuntu 16.04 image to have interfaces named
> "ethx" rather than "ensx"?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joe
>
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss


Re: [onap-discuss] quick question on vFW demo

2018-04-25 Thread ROSE, DANIEL V
Yes the code in the demo repo that marco wrote assumed the old way of naming 
before systemd changed things. 1404 should let things work

Daniel Rose
ECOMP / ONAP
com.att.ecomp
732-420-7308

From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of FREEMAN, BRIAN D
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2018 4:07 PM
To: Joe Kidder <joe.kid...@5thlayer.com>; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] quick question on vFW demo

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.
I think it should be the Ubuntu 14.04 image for the vFW demo.

Brian


From: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org> 
<onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org>>
 On Behalf Of Joe Kidder
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2018 3:47 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>
Subject: [onap-discuss] quick question on vFW demo

When I launch the vFW demo heat template (from Amsterdam, I believe), the 
ubuntu 16.04 image that I have installed on OpenStack (grabbed from 
http://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/xenial/current/xenial-server-cloudimg-amd64-disk<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__cloud-2Dimages.ubuntu.com_xenial_current_xenial-2Dserver-2Dcloudimg-2Damd64-2Ddisk=DwMFaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=e3d1ehx3DI5AoMgDmi2Fzw=1e5LECa3kcHh89TxJXaUYpkcrq3HzmcBCWk1cZwJwts=ojLHaTDvuP6-Mj_VT-0Nhpq7Gt_HpsJEoFhZ0mBbhBM=>1.img)
 has ethernet interfaces named "ens3", "ens4", "ens5".

However, the v_sink_install.sh, for example, tries to perform actions on eth1 
and eth2 (skipping eth0, as it's not interesting other than providing a path to 
the internet).

Am I missing a step?

Should I have massaged my ubuntu 16.04 image to have interfaces named "ethx" 
rather than "ensx"?

Thanks,
Joe
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss


Re: [onap-discuss] quick question on vFW demo

2018-04-25 Thread FREEMAN, BRIAN D
I think it should be the Ubuntu 14.04 image for the vFW demo.

Brian


From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org <onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org> 
On Behalf Of Joe Kidder
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2018 3:47 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] quick question on vFW demo

When I launch the vFW demo heat template (from Amsterdam, I believe), the 
ubuntu 16.04 image that I have installed on OpenStack (grabbed from 
http://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/xenial/current/xenial-server-cloudimg-amd64-disk<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__cloud-2Dimages.ubuntu.com_xenial_current_xenial-2Dserver-2Dcloudimg-2Damd64-2Ddisk=DwMFaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=e3d1ehx3DI5AoMgDmi2Fzw=1e5LECa3kcHh89TxJXaUYpkcrq3HzmcBCWk1cZwJwts=ojLHaTDvuP6-Mj_VT-0Nhpq7Gt_HpsJEoFhZ0mBbhBM=>1.img)
 has ethernet interfaces named "ens3", "ens4", "ens5".

However, the v_sink_install.sh, for example, tries to perform actions on eth1 
and eth2 (skipping eth0, as it's not interesting other than providing a path to 
the internet).

Am I missing a step?

Should I have massaged my ubuntu 16.04 image to have interfaces named "ethx" 
rather than "ensx"?

Thanks,
Joe
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss


[onap-discuss] quick question on vFW demo

2018-04-25 Thread Joe Kidder
When I launch the vFW demo heat template (from Amsterdam, I believe), the
ubuntu 16.04 image that I have installed on OpenStack (grabbed from
http://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/xenial/current/xenial-server-cloudimg-amd64-disk
1.img) has ethernet interfaces named "ens3", "ens4", "ens5".

However, the v_sink_install.sh, for example, tries to perform actions on
eth1 and eth2 (skipping eth0, as it's not interesting other than providing
a path to the internet).

Am I missing a step?

Should I have massaged my ubuntu 16.04 image to have interfaces named
"ethx" rather than "ensx"?

Thanks,
Joe
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss