n R4, which fits the definition. Alex, you can confirm whether
>> I interpreted it correctly.
>>
>>
>>
>> For others who haven’t attend the resource IM call, please noted that the
>> “lifecycle” stereotype of the model is still under discussion. The interest
>&
.
BR,
Xu
From:
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org>
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org>]
On Behalf Of jessie jewitt
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2018 12:05 AM
To: denghui (L) mailto:dengh
” stereotype of the model is still under discussion. The interest
> group just agrees that the IISOMI definition of “obsolete” fits the current
> intention of the proposal and decides to use the term.
>
>
>
> BR,
>
> Xu
>
>
>
> *From:* onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.or
12:05 AM
To: denghui (L)
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Call for approval on the “obsolete
legacy attributes/datatypes” proposal for the resource IM
Hello Deng Hui-
Could you please clarify something for me. The ETSI "applied stereotype&
Hello Deng Hui-
Could you please clarify something for me. The ETSI "applied
stereotype", on which this column in the wiki table is based, has
"obsolete" as an artifact lifecycle option, with its definition supplied in
the IISOMI Modeling Guidelines. This is the definition of "obsolete" in
tho
Hello all,
This is 1 week’s call for approval on the “obsolete legacy
attributes/datatypes” proposal for the resource IM.
The intention is to mark several attributes/datatypes of the current model as
“obsoleted” as their functionalities are covered by some other attributes.
Detailed information
