Hi Dan,
Thanks for the clarification. I checked the SDN-R documents on the wiki page …
According to the SDN-R subproject proposal (drafted Nov. 2017) the following
features are in scope for R2:
· Enhancements to support the ONAP release 2 use cases, e.g., RAN
deployment, Slicing, SON
Very useful clarification. BR, Steve.
From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org]
On Behalf Of TIMONEY, DAN
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2018 2:50 PM
To: Parviz Yegani ; Alla Goldner
; Vladimir Yanover (vyanover) ;
Dhananjay Pavgi ; SHANKARANARAYANAN, N K
; onap-
All,
I think perhaps when thinking about the relationship between SDN-R and SDN-C,
it might be helpful to draw a parallel to OpenDaylight. OpenDaylight consists
of many projects (the project list on their Gerrit is 4 pages long, with about
25 per page – so close to a hundred), but a given dep
Guys,
All proponents of SDN-R terminology - when I asked during the meeting are there
any concerns regarding the compromise proposal of saying "SDN-C" and then
explicitly describing the functionality of this sub-module, there were no
concerns about it.
One additional sub-compromise :) - can we
Concur with views below from Shankar. Why confuse by changing it to SDN-C when
we know it's functionality quite "Radio" and wireless domain specific.
thanks & regards,
Dhananjay Pavgi
+91 98220 22264
From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org On
Behalf Of SHANKARANARAYANAN, N K (N K)
Sent: Thursday
