Apologies for getting on this thread a bit late. One good metric for continued 
tracking/grading with be the API stability over successive ONAP releases – both 
APIs internal to ONAP (between ONAP components) and also external APIs. 
Stability of APIs would be a good testament to the solidity of ONAP 
architecture and also a key criterion for industry adoption and production 
deployments. I would like to discuss this at the Paris meeting and see if we 
can define some meaningful measurable metrics.

/R

From: <onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org> on behalf of Dhananjay Pavgi 
<dp00476...@techmahindra.com>
Date: Thursday, September 14, 2017 at 3:43 AM
To: "GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E)" <ma...@research.att.com>, 
"onap-disc...@lists.onap.org" <onap-disc...@lists.onap.org>, 
"onap-tsc@lists.onap.org P" <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] ONAP TSC measures of success

Dear All,

Couple of other measures that could be considered:


1.      JUNit test coverage across LOC : Indicator of Code Quality (i.e. being 
unit tested)

2.      Number of VNFs successfully on boarded and tested : Indicator of VNF 
adoption rate for ONAP

3.      Number of Integration Test cases covered : Indicator of platform 
maturity for E-2-E use.

thanks & regards,
Dhananjay Pavgi
Mobile : +91 98220 22264
[id:image002.png@01CE7323.F2727500]               [NAP_logo_Sig]
www.techmahindra.com<http://www.techmahindra.com/>                 Platinum 
Member. Visit : http://www.onap.org<http://www.onap.org/>

From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] 
On Behalf Of GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E)
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2017 10:26 PM
To: onap-disc...@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc@lists.onap.org P 
<onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>
Subject: [onap-tsc] ONAP TSC measures of success

Dear ONAP Community,

I want to start an email dialog which we will follow up in our Paris meeting on 
technical measures of success of the ONAP platform.
What measures we should track and make publicly visible in PR events? I know 
LOC has been used already. This seems like one
of 2-3 other measures we should be tracking.

Those measures should be agnostic to any particular release and publicly 
recognized. Please share your thoughts and ideas.

thanks!
Mazin




============================================================================================================================
Disclaimer:  This message and the information contained herein is proprietary 
and confidential and subject to the Tech Mahindra policy statement, you may 
review the policy at http://www.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html externally 
http://tim.techmahindra.com/tim/disclaimer.html internally within TechMahindra.
============================================================================================================================
_______________________________________________
ONAP-TSC mailing list
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc

Reply via email to