[onap-tsc] ACTION REQUIRED BY PTLs / Please add comment on status to REQ-396

PTLs, The TSC needs to scope the effort for REQ-396 . Please do the following: 1. Navigate to REQ-396 2. Click the Comment button at the bottom of the page 3. Add a comment that includes the name of the project and whether Use Case code is

Re: [onap-tsc] The ONAP Calendars are messed up again.

All, I've been looking at this stuff all day and I am still stumped. I haven't found any info via a web search that has been helpful and the model Hyperledger is actively using to work around the issues we keep running into It works fine for a couple of lists and fails for all the rest and I

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-ptl] [ONAP][Maintenance Releases] What's onboarded from an OOM point of view

David, I actually replied to that other thread (see attached) with a link to the Jira query listing the CCSDK and SDNC Jira tickets for the El Alto and Frankfurt maintenance releases. There are quite a few fixes for CDS that we were asked by downstream users to include in El Alto so they

Re: [onap-tsc] [ONAP][Maintenance Releases] What's onboarded from an OOM point of view

Dan, In particular, there are about 24 CCSDK issues that are planned for the El Alto maintenance release that I didn't see in Sylvain's list (see Matched tab). Please let me know whether those should be included, or not. David On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 1:36 PM David McBride wrote: > Thanks for

Re: [onap-tsc] [ONAP][Maintenance Releases] What's onboarded from an OOM point of view

Thanks for starting this thread. I'd like to use this discussion to reconcile the different views on the content of the maintenance releases. I took all of the Jira issues referenced in this thread and put them into two spreadsheets; one for El Alto, and one for Frankfurt. Each spreadsheet has

Re: [onap-tsc] [ONAP][Maintenance Releases] What's onboarded from an OOM point of view

Krzysztof, For Guilin, instead of certInitializer, how about if we change dgbuilder to use http instead of https and use it as a trial for using an ingress controller instead of a node port? Since dgbuilder is a design time tool primarily, it's pretty isolated and low risk- and then we'll

[onap-tsc] The ONAP Calendars are messed up again.

I'm looking into it. :-( Thanks! -kenny -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#6763): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/6763 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/75519845/21656 Group Owner:

Re: [onap-tsc] [ONAP][Maintenance Releases] What's onboarded from an OOM point of view

David, Sylvain, Catherine: The changes in CCSDK and SDNC for the Frankfurt maintenance release are marked in the ONAP jira with the frankfurt_maintenance_release_1 tag. I created a shared query for (hopefully) easy reference: https://jira.onap.org/issues/?filter=12419 The changes in CCSDK

[onap-tsc] Project maturity review for MSB

Dear TSC, Here’s a request to schedule a project maturity review for MSB. Completed Project Review: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Project+Maturity+Review+for+MSB Thanks, Huabing -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#6761):

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-ptl] [ONAP][Maintenance Releases] What's onboarded from an OOM point of view

Hi Jorge, we're waiting few patches to be done on both elalto and Frankfurt side so no problem to add new Policy change! Regards, Sylvain De : HERNANDEZ-HERRERO, JORGE [jh1...@att.com] Envoyé : vendredi 10 juillet 2020 19:53 À : DESBUREAUX Sylvain TGI/OLN;