+1  Upstream first .
thanks to bring this .

murat

On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Dhananjay Pavgi <
dp00476...@techmahindra.com> wrote:

> +1 on Upstream first. Some views on ONAP’s adoption in production
> environments:
>
>
>
> 1.       Regular Code Quality Analysis to be done.
>
> 2.       Arrive at #TECHDEBT and have it tracked through Jira backlog
>
> 3.       Every release plan MUST cover as to what % of #TECHDEBT would be
> addressed in that release.
>
> 4.       #TECHDEBT to be tracked for each component and entire platform
> as such (imbibe Scrum of Scrum discipline)
>
>
>
> Afraid that we are too focused on functional aspects at the moment that
> are tracked through Jira user stories and Sprint plans. However, we are
> grossly ignoring #TECHDEBT.
>
>
>
> thanks & regards,
>
> Dhananjay Pavgi
>
> Mobile : +91 98220 22264 <+91%2098220%2022264>
>
> [image: cid:image002.png@01CE7323.F2727500]               [image:
> ONAP_logo_Sig]
>
> www.techmahindra.com                 Platinum Member. Visit :
> http://www.onap.org
>
>
>
> *From:* onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-bounces@
> lists.onap.org] *On Behalf Of *Ed Warnicke
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 02, 2017 10:42 PM
> *To:* Sauvageau, David <david.sauvag...@bell.ca>
> *Cc:* onap-tsc@lists.onap.org
> *Subject:* Re: [onap-tsc] Enforcing an "Upstream first" approach to ONAP
>
>
>
> +1 Upstream first is crucial.
>
>
>
> Happy to share sane strategies I've seen work in the past if folks are
> interested.
>
>
>
> Ed
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 9:37 AM, Sauvageau, David <david.sauvag...@bell.ca>
> wrote:
>
> Hi TSC members,
>
>
>
> I would like to bring to our attention one major opportunity for
> improvement in the behaviour currently adopted by some of our community
> members.
>
>
>
> I am observing a big number of very large commits (10’s of thousands of
> lines of code in a single commit) which to me is a symptom of us not
> working well as a community yet. In order to be successful, I believe
> communities need to adopt an “Upstream first” approach, meaning that every
> single day, the new code is committed upstream. We need to avoid the “we’ll
> build it internally and then upstream the code” approach. This is the only
> way we’ll get traction as a community rather than allowing individual
> companies to push for internal agendas.
>
>
>
> With the current approach, it is very difficult for the community to start
> contributing to ongoing projects, or even to know what’s coming up on the
> projects as code is pushed by major chunks with no visibility on the
> roadmap. If we continue supporting such behaviour this will slow down the
> adoption of ONAP in production environments.
>
>
>
> I believe it is our responsibility as the TSC to change that behaviour,
> first by educating different organizations how open source should be
> handled, but probably also by putting technical mechanisms to prevent such
> a behaviour (e.g. Limit commit size; enforce multi-company reviews before
> merge, allow for unfinished code in the repo …, any suggestions welcome).
>
>
>
> I do not have a specific solution to propose, but I would ask the TSC to
> open up the dialogue on such behaviour. The Amsterdam release is quickly
> coming and I believe this needs to be addressed asap.
>
>
>
> I’d like to discuss the topic tomorrow during TSC.
>
>
>
> Comments, anyone?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ONAP-TSC mailing list
> ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
> https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc
>
>
>
> ============================================================
> ================================================================
>
> Disclaimer:  This message and the information contained herein is
> proprietary and confidential and subject to the Tech Mahindra policy
> statement, you may review the policy at http://www.techmahindra.com/
> Disclaimer.html externally http://tim.techmahindra.com/tim/disclaimer.html
> internally within TechMahindra.
>
> ============================================================
> ================================================================
>
> _______________________________________________
> ONAP-TSC mailing list
> ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
> https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc
>
>
_______________________________________________
ONAP-TSC mailing list
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc

Reply via email to