Dear TSC members,
In light of the recent events and the complexity of the ONAP community, I
suggest that the TSC will take more rigid approach in regard to elected formal
positions in the community.
It should be agreed that a person with a formal elected position, will not be
able to run to ano
Hi Steve
Modeling project has already limited the number of each company to 2.
Thanks
DENG Hui
From: Stephen Terrill [mailto:stephen.terr...@ericsson.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 9, 2017 1:18 AM
To: denghui (L) ; onap-tsc@lists.onap.org;
onap-disc...@lists.onap.org
Subject: RE: Removing the committ
Hi Fellow TSC members,
As indicated in the last TSC meeting I will forward the proposed participants
for the vulnerability management sub-committee and who should be on that list.
As a reminder, the vulnerability management subcommittee is to handle the
reception to resolution of received vulne
Hi Deng,
I agree that the text could be clearer about how to handle the project
formation phase, however the interpretation that we could go with was what was
discussed in the last TSC, the PTL solicits commitment from the committers and
is that is not forthcoming than the interpretation of “or
Hi,
I also agree this is under the TSC perview as it relates to the health of the
community. As we are in a formation stage some hiccups will arise and its how
we deal with them that is important. I find it encouraging that there is an
open debate about this and an interest to address it with
The irregularities is not a good starting point for our projet.
How we can attract new members with this kind of situation ?
As we have discussed during our last project review we can consider also an
irregularity in the PTL election as we have agreed to review the list of
committees
Best
Jamil
