[onap-tsc] Outcomes of Usecase subcommittee meeting today

2017-12-13 Thread Alla Goldner
Hi all, Thanks a lot to those attending our meeting today, both f2f and in remote mode!!! Here is the summary/list of action items: 1. Needed to have contact person details per each requirement - Alla to provide (in the attached) 2. Scaling out requirement is merged with auto/man

Re: [onap-tsc] Planning for ONAP TSC Elections

2017-12-13 Thread Phil Robb
Thanks for the feedback Frank and your willingness to help on the WG if we choose to go that way. Other TSC members, please let me know your thoughts when you are able. Thanks, Phil. On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 4:46 PM, Frank Brockners (fbrockne) < fbroc...@cisco.com> wrote: > Hi Phil, > > > > you

Re: [onap-tsc] Planning for ONAP TSC Elections

2017-12-13 Thread Frank Brockners (fbrockne)
Hi Phil, your suggestion to keep the current structure stable until Beijing is released makes sense. I also support your proposal to form a task force which compiles a suggestion for TSC composition and membership in the “stable” phase moving forward. Other projects which move to LFN have taken

[onap-tsc] Planning for ONAP TSC Elections

2017-12-13 Thread Phil Robb
Hello ONAP TSC Members: As documented in the ONAP Project Charter, the TSC is tasked with figuring out how to populate the TSC in a meritocratic manner beginning 12 months after the project launch, which was March 2017. Hence it is time to start planning this transition. To kick this process off

[onap-tsc] Rename and move vagrant-onap project

2017-12-13 Thread Morales, Victor
Howdy, We have been thinking about the idea to have a separate repository for vagrant-onap project [1] instead of residing inside of Integration repo. The mainly reason behind that is to give more visibility and the addition of some specific project related Jenkins jobs. So, if there is no obj

[onap-tsc] Usecase subcommittee meeting during f2f meeting

2017-12-13 Thread Alla Goldner
Hi all, The Usecase subcommittee meeting will take place 1:15 to 3:15 in the room 175. Sorry for all confusion caused by project reviews taking longer than expected. Best regards, Alla Goldner Open Network Division Amdocs Technology [cid:image001.png@01D37460.3C1ECBD0] This message and the

[onap-tsc] [Modeling] Modeling session today - Update

2017-12-13 Thread denghui (L)
Hello all There is one mistake, updated again 1) 11:20 Considerations of Modelling Evolution in ONAP Michela Bevilacqua Room: Audito

[onap-tsc] [Modeling] Modeling session today

2017-12-13 Thread denghui (L)
Hello all This is the day before tomorrow workshop, today session related to modeling will be : 1) 11:20 Considerations of Modelling Evolution in ONAP Michela Bevilacqua

[onap-tsc] LFN Technical Charter Changes for ONAP

2017-12-13 Thread Kenny Paul
All Please find attached is a copy of the ONAP charter with the modifications to align ONAP as a Serries LLC project within the LF Networking umbrella.   ONAP Project a Series of LF Projects, LLC -- Technical Charter 12-8-2017.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document -kennyKenny Paul,  Technical Progr

[onap-tsc] Reply:RE: About Image Manager Project Proposal

2017-12-13 Thread zhao.huabing
Already there. Thanks! Sent from my zMail Original Message From:GildasLanilis; To:zhaohuabing10201488; Cc:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org;onap-disc...@lists.onap.org; Date:2017-12-09 07:47:51 Subject:RE: About Image Manager Project Proposal Hi Huabing, Thanks for the notice. C

Re: [onap-tsc] Existing project reviews

2017-12-13 Thread Stephen Terrill
Hi, Thanks for brining this up Jason. Maybe it would be useful that we develop and share our expectations in more detail about what is required to move to mature (i.e. what we look for in a review) in the form of .e.g a TSC policy or detailed maturity review checklist. BR, Steve From: Jaso