Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] [modeling] Call for agreement on lifecycle stereotype

se Gendoc to > update the wiki in the future, having the format aligned will ease the work. > > > > BR, > > Xu > > > > *From:* onap-disc...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-disc...@lists.onap.org] *On > Behalf Of *Jessie Jewitt > *Sent:* Tuesday, July 10, 2018 3:21 AM >

Re: [onap-discuss] [onap-tsc] PTL Election announcement for ONAP modeling project

Deng Hui- My question to you this morning was this. I have understood that the following info on this page: Casablanca Modeling M1 was what was approved by the TSC for Casablanca M1. This page includes all of our high-level

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] [modeling] Call for agreement on lifecycle stereotype

Just a minor comment: The lifecycle states ARE the applied stereotypes, not something called "lifecycle: XYZ". That's how GenDoc outputs them today. So, as an example, the applied stereotype for an artifact would be "Experimental". Otherwise, it looks like your applied stereotype is "lifecycle".

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP R3 Modeling high level requirements

Hello DENG Hui, I think it has been beneficial to collect and review the modeling requirements for R3. Thank you for doing this. I have a few questions for you, if you would be so kind as to answer: 1. The requirements were supposed to be completed, according to the Casablanca Release

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss][modeling] Call for approval on the “obsolete legacy attributes/datatypes” proposal for the resource IM

er interested people)could accept it. > Anyway, I encourage the proposer to discuss with Jessie to address her > comments. Or we need to discuss it the next week. > > Best regards, > Xu Yang > *发件人：*jessie jewitt > *收件人：*yangxu (H), > *抄 送：*denghui (L),onap-disc...

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss][modeling] Call for approval on the “obsolete legacy attributes/datatypes” proposal for the resource IM

pe of the model is still under discussion. The interest > group just agrees that the IISOMI definition of “obsolete” fits the current > intention of the proposal and decides to use the term. > > > > BR, > > Xu > > > > *From:* onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] [modeling] Call for approval on the “obsolete legacy attributes/datatypes” proposal for the resource IM

Hello Deng Hui- Could you please clarify something for me. The ETSI "applied stereotype", on which this column in the wiki table is based, has "obsolete" as an artifact lifecycle option, with its definition supplied in the IISOMI Modeling Guidelines. This is the definition of "obsolete" in

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP R2 IM to DM design

Hello- I don't remember this being an action out of the modelling committee meeting yesterday. How does it compare to the action item from another meeting that Alex, Thinh, Anatoly and myself took to work on the IM to DM model mapping, and the mappings that have already been proposed (and