[onap-tsc] Code Review: how to avoid long delay to review

2017-08-10 Thread eric.debeau
Hello There was a code review pending since 5 days due to a lack of reviewers. I think we should adopt some best practices to avoid such delay. A committer should inform the PTL and a list of reviewers by mail (typically the project committers and other people involved in the project) OPNFV

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] Code Review: how to avoid long delay to review

2017-08-10 Thread Gary Wu
To my knowledge, Gerrit doesn’t automatically add reviewers to changes on submission. However, if you add a comment/reply to a change, then it automatically adds you as a reviewer to that change, and will notify you of any future amendments thereof. Thanks, Gary From: DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM)

Re: [onap-tsc] Leadership Diversity Language

2017-08-10 Thread Phil Robb
Hello ONAP TSC Members: We should close on this topic in the near future. To that end, please consider this an attempt to get an email dialog going that will hopefully lead to us voting on what to say and where to put it. >From discussions that we've had... and I'm sure some level of personal

Re: [onap-tsc] Leadership Diversity Language

2017-08-10 Thread Christopher Donley (Chris)
I like the updated wording, and agree that this belongs as a policy (not in the charter). One slight quibble is that you use the word “recommend” in the second sentence and “requirement” in the fourth. I think we should be consistent. My personal preference is for recommendation. Chris

Re: [onap-tsc] Leadership Diversity Language

2017-08-10 Thread Phil Robb
Thanks for the feedback Chris (as always :-)) and your quibble is well received. Updated wording with suggested change below: *Leadership Diversity Policy * We as a community wish to foster a breadth of knowledgeable and engaged leaders, as well as ensure an ongoing diverse set of viewpoints

Re: [onap-tsc] Code Review: how to avoid long delay to review

2017-08-10 Thread Gary Wu
On notifications: Gerrit has built-in support to send email notifications on code changes. There are two methods: 1. The contributor can explicitly add a list of reviewers to the proposed change, which will trigger a notification to those individuals. This should ideally be done

[onap-tsc] New Agenda format for the TSC Meetings

2017-08-10 Thread Kenny Paul
As mentioned on today’s call it is better for the community to provide the input for the TSC agenda directly rather than filtering it through a middle-man. You will find the TSC Meeting Information & Resources page updated with agenda

[onap-tsc] TSC topic - branching/tagging for stable development/integration

2017-08-10 Thread Michael O'Brien
TSC, In your meeting today could you discuss (I would normally attend - but have a parallel meet) 1) how to ensure the stability of the 1.1/master branch as we add new R1 content - need E2E integration daily tests - we then deploy to Rackspace/Openstack only TAGGED-OK

Re: [onap-tsc] Register Now - ONAP Face To Face Developer Event in Paris-Saclay France

2017-08-10 Thread Subramanya, Nagesha (Nokia - IN/Bangalore)
Below mail requires correction in terms of dates … Monday, Sept. 25th, 13:00 - 17:00: Early Bird Sessions (Optional) for those able to arrive on Monday Tuesday, Sept. 26th, 09:00 - 17:00: Main Developer Forum Wednesday, Sept. 27th, 09:00 - 17:00: Main Developer Forum Thursday, Sept 28th, 09:00

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] Code Review: how to avoid long delay to review

2017-08-10 Thread DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM)
My understanding was that when someone submits code for review, that committers automatically get email notification for it and also automatically get added to the list of reviewers. However, this has been inconsistent. Being a committer, I have noticed that sometimes I am added as a reviewer

[onap-tsc] about disscuss in VoLTE [SO] / [SDNC] Interface discussion (8/11, 10:00 pm UTC8 / 10:00 am EST )

2017-08-10 Thread huang.zhuoyao
Hi, Dan May I ask what's the topic gonna to be disscussed in VoLTE [SO] / [SDNC] Interface discussion (8/11, 10:00 pm UTC8 / 10:00 am EST )? Thank you! 黄卓垚huangzhuoyao 职位position 承载网管开发部/有线研究院/有线产品经营部Strategy & IT-IT Dept.

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] about disscuss in VoLTE [SO] / [SDNC] Interface discussion (8/11, 10:00 pm UTC8 / 10:00 am EST )

2017-08-10 Thread Yang Xu (Yang, Fixed Network)
Zhouyao, This would be the same meeting as another one scheduled for the same time slot with topic of “[sdc][so][sdnc] VoLTE WAN service definition”. I didn’t see Dan sent out the invite late afternoon and I could not reach him at that time, so I booked a meeting with my bridge. We will merge

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] [Update] ONAP workflow design and executiondiscussion

2017-08-10 Thread zhao.huabing
Hi, Meeting recording has been uploaded to this page:https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/SDC+2017-8-11+ONAP+workflow+design+and+execution+discussion @Michael, If you don't mind, I put the recording under the SDC weekly meeting page because workflow designer is part of SDC. Thanks,

Re: [onap-tsc] [SDNC] [SO] Hi, Here is the remain questions// summary and proposed action for SPTN WAN Model and implementation

2017-08-10 Thread yuan.yue
Hi all, We have had a pretty good discussion on WAN connection of volte use case this morning/last evening. Many thanks to all who help to clear the sequence, interface among SO, SDNC, 3rd party controller also inside the SDNC. I believe we can move forward now. May I propose next step