Re: [onap-tsc] Release management process is broken

2018-02-28 Thread Gary Wu
Usually the maven release plugin is used for this, which would: · Checkout SNAPSHOT version poms, e.g. “1.1-SNAPSHOT” · Update poms to release version, e.g. “1.1” · Build and run all tests · Commit release version poms into git repo · Tag this “release

[onap-tsc] tagging issues

2018-02-28 Thread eric.debeau
Hello We still have some problems in the ONAP versioning/tagging. In the Amsterdam version environment file (https://git.onap.org/demo/plain/heat/ONAP/onap_openstack.env?h=amsterdam) , there is still one project based on master branch. The Docker tags are not all aligned (some start with v,

Re: [onap-tsc] Release management process is broken

2018-02-28 Thread Alexis de Talhouët
Does anyone has any input on the same? I think it is *critical* that we can deliver tagged artifacts (whether maven, docker *and code*) for each of our release. Most importantly, for Beijing coming in a few weeks. We had a discussion last week on the #lf-releng channel, and it seems the issue

Re: [onap-tsc] tagging issues

2018-02-28 Thread Yunxia Chen
Hi, Eric, I agree with you: this indeed a concern. Right now, Gildas, Ran and Gary are working with Linux foundation on this one and hopefully to get a solution very soon. And I also expect a stable master branch build, meaning we could run some basic sanity testing, more specifically, passing

Re: [onap-tsc] tagging issues

2018-02-28 Thread Gildas Lanilis
Hi Eric, To help the discussion on tagging, I would like to indicate that tagging is made in multiple locations. From what I know I see: 1) Tagging at the repository level: that was done by LF when we had the first release of Amsterdam on Nov 16 and then later for the maintenance release