Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] Architecture Progress

2017-07-28 Thread jamil.chawki
Dear Chris Éric will participate to the architecture meeting Regards Jamil Le 27 juil. 2017 à 20:22, Christopher Donley (Chris) > a écrit : Dear Jamil, Thank you for sharing. I’d like to invite you to present your concerns

Re: [onap-tsc] REMINDER - Re: Irregularities in the Use Case Subcommittee Chair Election

2017-07-11 Thread jamil.chawki
Hi Mazin Are you proposing a new subcommittee to review the TSC voting procedure for the election of subcommittee Chair ? My preference will be to discuss first the irregularity of the use case election during the next TSC meeting before to take any action. Regards Jamil De :

Re: [onap-tsc] Vulnerability Management subcommittee (and TSC Action)

2017-07-12 Thread jamil.chawki
+1 Regards jamil De : onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] De la part de Stephen Terrill Envoyé : samedi 8 juillet 2017 23:23 À : t...@lists.onap.org Cc : David Jorm; SPATSCHECK, OLIVER (OLIVER); HE Ruan IMT/OLS; onap-sec...@lists.onap.org Objet : [onap-tsc]

Re: [onap-tsc] Irregularities in the Use Case Subcommittee Chair Election

2017-07-06 Thread jamil.chawki
Hello Thank you Phil for this analysis, we need also to analyse the election of other subcommittee. I will ask during the TSC meeting to cancel this election and to review the process. Regards Jamil Cordialement Jamil Le 5 juil. 2017 à 23:44, Phil Robb

Re: [onap-tsc] Seed code for Service Orchestrator

2017-05-11 Thread jamil.chawki
Hello I can't understand how projects editing are managed, modifications are introduced in SO project without agreement and not aligned with the what were discussed and agreed last week. Phil, Mazin cloud you clarify the situation ? Regards Jamil Le 11 mai 2017 à 21:48,

Re: [onap-tsc] [ONAP TSC VOTE] vCPE Residential Broadband Use Case For Release-1

2017-06-16 Thread jamil.chawki
Le 17 juin 2017 à 05:52, Phil Robb > a écrit : Hello ONAP TSC Members: As we left it on the ONAP TSC call this week, please review and vote on the vCPE Residential Broadband Use Case proposal for inclusion in Release-1 of the ONAP

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] Tentative July ONAP Developers Face-to-Face Meeting

2017-06-14 Thread jamil.chawki
My understanding the agreement was to have a virtual meeting in July and a physical one in September Best Jamil Le 14 juin 2017 à 01:11, Arul Nambi > a écrit : +1 for virtual meetings From:

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] Tentative July ONAP Developers Face-to-Face Meeting

2017-06-16 Thread jamil.chawki
-1 for physical F2F meeting in July De : Lingli Deng [mailto:denglin...@chinamobile.com] Envoyé : vendredi 16 juin 2017 10:25 À : aayush.bhatna...@ril.com; CHAWKI Jamil IMT/OLN; arul.na...@amdocs.com; elhay.efr...@amdocs.com Cc : onap-disc...@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc@lists.onap.org Objet : RE:

Re: [onap-tsc] [tsc]Vote: ONAP Deployment Proposal for Amsterdam Release

2017-09-19 Thread jamil.chawki
Hello I don’t remember that we have agreed to initiate a vote on this topic. As mentioned by Mazin we have agreed to have in priority Heat but without excluding OOM which I hope will be ready for a v2 of Rel-1. Regards Jamil De : onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org

[onap-tsc] ETSI NFV- Tutorial

2017-09-13 Thread jamil.chawki
Interesting presentations on ETSI NFV https://nfvwiki.etsi.org/index.php?title=ETSI_NFV_Tutorial _ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations

Re: [onap-tsc] Proposing ONAP CLI as MVP

2017-10-06 Thread jamil.chawki
Hello To my knowledge we have agreed to integrate any project that will pass M4, the gating is a kind of top priority project for Release Amsterdam. Regards Jamil De : onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] De la part de eric.deb...@orange.com Envoyé : vendredi

Re: [onap-tsc] Planning for ONAP TSC Elections

2017-12-15 Thread jamil.chawki
Hello Phil I am interested to be part of a workgroup. Best Jamil Le 14 déc. 2017 à 01:03, Phil Robb > a écrit : Hello ONAP TSC Members: As documented in the ONAP Project Charter, the TSC is tasked with figuring out how to populate

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

2017-11-14 Thread jamil.chawki
I agree, we don’t need to mention commercial cloud solution in our architecture Regards Jamil Le 14 nov. 2017 à 14:06, Pasi Vaananen > a écrit : Are Azure & AMZ clouds really supported in Amsterdam as NFVI+VIM (or at all) ? If not, then they

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

2017-11-14 Thread jamil.chawki
Hi Vladimir The diagram is more a technical overview of onap components. Regards Jamil Le 14 nov. 2017 à 11:25, Vladimir Yanover (vyanover) > a écrit : Hello, Kenny Thanks for sharing the Architecture diagram. I will appreciate if you help me with a

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

2017-11-14 Thread jamil.chawki
Hello Kenny I have a question on the ETSI aligned of VFC module, to my knowledge the VFC interfaces are not aligned with ETSI NFV. I think we need to remove this term from VFC and to add that ONAP architecture is Functionally aligned with ETSI NFV. Regards Jamil De :

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

2017-11-14 Thread jamil.chawki
Hi Lisa I understand but also we cannot keep a no meaning abbreviations... We can have a list of abbreviation or a simplify name like: · Clamp > Closed Loop · AAF > Authorization · OOF Optimization Regards Jamil De : Lisa Caywood [mailto:lcayw...@linuxfoundation.org]

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

2017-11-14 Thread jamil.chawki
Hello Kenny Additional comments and proposals on this figure: 1- Remove ETSI NFV alignment from VFC and to replace it by a general note that 'ONAP is functionally aligned with ETSI NFV architecture' 2- We need to remove AWS, Rackspace and Azure. Why Rackspace is listed and not

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

2017-11-14 Thread jamil.chawki
Yes this is in the Scope of the Architecture subcommittee https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Goals De : Vladimir Yanover (vyanover) [mailto:vyano...@cisco.com] Envoyé : mardi 14 novembre 2017 14:55 À : CHAWKI Jamil IMT/OLN Cc : Kenny Paul; onap-discuss; onap-tsc; Lisa Caywood Objet : RE: [onap-tsc]

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

2017-11-14 Thread jamil.chawki
Hi Susana Ok in this case we have to remove this from VFC. Regards jamil De : Sabater, Susana, Vodafone Spain [mailto:susana.saba...@vodafone.com] Envoyé : mardi 14 novembre 2017 16:26 À : Lisa Caywood; CHAWKI Jamil IMT/OLN Cc : onap-discuss; onap-tsc Objet : RE: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP

Re: [onap-tsc] [Onap-arc] ONAP Architecture presentation

2017-11-21 Thread jamil.chawki
+1 And also a short summary of the meeting Best Jamil De : onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] De la part de Alla Goldner Envoyé : mardi 21 novembre 2017 18:32 À : Pasi Vaananen; Stephen Terrill; onap-...@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc@lists.onap.org Objet : Re:

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

2017-11-15 Thread jamil.chawki
+1 De : Kanagaraj Manickam [mailto:kanagaraj.manic...@huawei.com] Envoyé : mercredi 15 novembre 2017 06:00 À : TALASILA, MANOOP (MANOOP); Kenny Paul; Lisa Caywood Cc : Sabater, Susana, Vodafone Spain; CHAWKI Jamil IMT/OLN; onap-discuss; onap-tsc Objet : RE: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

2017-11-15 Thread jamil.chawki
+1 in addition Portal should not be part of the Design Time. OOM need to be positioned on the right to avoid to be considered as on the top of External API Regards Jamil De : TALASILA, MANOOP (MANOOP) [mailto:talas...@research.att.com] Envoyé : mercredi 15 novembre 2017 03:43 À : Kenny Paul;

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

2017-11-15 Thread jamil.chawki
Hi Maopeng I understand that it is not easy to map ETSI to ONAP architecture. But I don’t think by putting VFC aligned with ETSI NFV make any sense. As we are in one project my preference is to mention that ONAP is a way to implement ETSI NFV functionalities. Regards jamil De :

Re: [onap-tsc] TSC Composition Proposal

2018-05-02 Thread jamil.chawki
Hello Team I think having one representative and a mix 50/50 of vendors/operators is a big opportunity for the adoption of ONAP by the Telco Industry. Our position is to have the TSC election after the delivery of a stable/deployable Release C and more Operators involvement in the community.

Re: [onap-tsc] We need to decide how to populate the ONAP Representative to the LFN TAC

2018-01-22 Thread jamil.chawki
Hello I agree with Steve that we need to select an option. Phil do you have a proposal for selection? Best Jamil Le 22 janv. 2018 à 23:45, Stephen Terrill > a écrit : Hi, Originally there were three proposals put on the table,

Re: [onap-tsc] We need to decide how to populate the ONAP Representative to the LFN TAC

2018-01-11 Thread jamil.chawki
Hi Phil I am in favor with your proposal for #2 Best Jamil Le 11 janv. 2018 à 16:08, Phil Robb > a écrit : Hello ONAP TSC Members: Now that ONAP is a part of the Linux Foundation Networking (LFN) Directed Fund, we need to decide how

Re: [onap-tsc] Committer Promotion Request for [appc]

2018-01-11 Thread jamil.chawki
Hello Randa +1 for your proposal Regards Jamil Le 12 janv. 2018 à 00:58, MAHER, RANDA > a écrit : Dear TSC, Please consider request below for Committer Promotion for APPC project. https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=22251669 One of our

Re: [onap-tsc] ONS Registration Discount for active developers and leadership

2018-01-27 Thread jamil.chawki
Good news Phill Best Jamil Le 27 janv. 2018 à 06:48, Phil Robb > a écrit : Hello ONAP community: Active developers and project leadership are strongly encouraged to participate in the ONS event. Monday and Tuesday will be

Re: [onap-tsc] RT-Catalog project proposal

2018-01-17 Thread jamil.chawki
Daer Maopeng We have agreed in the architecture Subcommittee to evaluate the impact of the RT Catalog on other technical modules (SO, APPC, VFC, SDNC …) . My preference will be to wait the output of this evaluation before to present this project at the TSC level. Regards Jamil ·

Re: [onap-tsc] TSC Composition Proposal

2018-04-05 Thread jamil.chawki
Thank You Mazin I fully understand and support your concern to have 50% of Telecom Operators in the TSC, 10 members (out of 15) have voted to postpone the election after Releace C (not accepted as we need 12 to change the Charter). I don’t understand Chirs and Steve motivation to have a TSC