Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

mil.cha...@orange.com>>, "Sabater, Susana, Vodafone Spain" <susana.saba...@vodafone.com<mailto:susana.saba...@vodafone.com>> Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide Hi Kenny, In the Architecture slide, can we please rename “Portal Framework -

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

; Lisa Caywood Cc : onap-discuss; onap-tsc; CHAWKI Jamil IMT/OLN; Sabater, Susana, Vodafone Spain Objet : Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide Hi Kenny, In the Architecture slide, can we please rename “Portal Framework - UI” -> “ONAP Portal Platform”? as it is not just UI (I h

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide - VMs and CaaS Deployments

las...@research.att.com>; Kenny Paul <kp...@linuxfoundation.org>; Lisa Caywood <lcayw...@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: onap-discuss <onap-disc...@lists.onap.org>; onap-tsc <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org> Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide Dear Kenny, I would like share

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

rg>>, onap-tsc <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>>, "jamil.cha...@orange.com<mailto:jamil.cha...@orange.com>" <jamil.cha...@orange.com<mailto:jamil.cha...@orange.com>>, "Sabater, Susana, Vodafone Spain" <susana.sab

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

@lists.onap.org> Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide And where this intention / timeline is captured? Thanks Vladimir From: jamil.cha...@orange.com<mailto:jamil.cha...@orange.com> [mailto:jamil.cha...@orange.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 4:29 PM To: Vladimir Y

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

g>>; onap-tsc <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>> Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide Jamil, we can not spell out the names of all of the components on the slide; there isn't room. It must be legible, including from a distance (eg in a p

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

on.org] Envoyé : mardi 14 novembre 2017 16:19 À : CHAWKI Jamil IMT/OLN Cc : Kenny Paul; onap-discuss; onap-tsc Objet : Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide Jamil, we can not spell out the names of all of the components on the slide; there isn't room. It must be legible, including from a di

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

Jamil, we can not spell out the names of all of the components on the slide; there isn't room. It must be legible, including from a distance (eg in a public presentation). Chris can answer #2. Thanks, Lisa On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 7:14 AM, wrote: > Hello Kenny > >

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

Hello Kenny Additional comments and proposals on this figure: 1- Remove ETSI NFV alignment from VFC and to replace it by a general note that 'ONAP is functionally aligned with ETSI NFV architecture' 2- We need to remove AWS, Rackspace and Azure. Why Rackspace is listed and not

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

:43 AM To: Vul, Alex <alex@intel.com<mailto:alex@intel.com>>; jamil.cha...@orange.com<mailto:jamil.cha...@orange.com>; onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org> Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide "The officially approved image f

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

, Alex <alex@intel.com>; jamil.cha...@orange.com; onap-tsc@lists.onap.org Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide "The officially approved image for the Amsterdam Architecture". We need both r1 and "beyond" slides ... but this slide was explicitly sa

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

Of Jason Hunt Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 6:37 AM To: Kenny Paul <kp...@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: onap-tsc <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>; onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org; Lisa Caywood <lcayw...@linuxfoundation.org> Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide +1. I

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

n Behalf Of > *jamil.cha...@orange.com > *Sent:* Tuesday, November 14, 2017 5:17 AM > *To:* Pasi Vaananen <pvaan...@redhat.com>; onap-tsc@lists.onap.org > *Subject:* Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide > > > > I agree, we don’t need to mention commercial

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

Vul Intel Corporation From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of jamil.cha...@orange.com Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 5:17 AM To: Pasi Vaananen <pvaan...@redhat.com>; onap-tsc@lists.onap.org Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Archit

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

And where this intention / timeline is captured? Thanks Vladimir From: jamil.cha...@orange.com [mailto:jamil.cha...@orange.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 4:29 PM To: Vladimir Yanover (vyanover) <vyano...@cisco.com> Subject: RE: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide It should b

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

Kenny Paul <kp...@linuxfoundation.org>; onap-discuss <onap-disc...@lists.onap.org>; onap-tsc <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>; Lisa Caywood <lcayw...@linuxfoundation.org> Subject: RE: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide Yes this is in the Scope of the Architecture subc

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

t;mailto:onap-disc...@lists.onap.org>>; onap-tsc <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>>; Lisa Caywood <lcayw...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:lcayw...@linuxfoundation.org>> Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide Hi Vladimir The diagram

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

To: Vladimir Yanover (vyanover) <vyano...@cisco.com> Cc: Kenny Paul <kp...@linuxfoundation.org>; onap-discuss <onap-disc...@lists.onap.org>; onap-tsc <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>; Lisa Caywood <lcayw...@linuxfoundation.org> Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

iscuss <onap-disc...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-disc...@lists.onap.org>>; onap-tsc <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>> Cc: Lisa Caywood <lcayw...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:lcayw...@linuxfoundation.org>> Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONA

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

+Lisa > On Nov 14, 2017, at 5:06 AM, Pasi Vaananen wrote: > > Are Azure & AMZ clouds really supported in Amsterdam as NFVI+VIM (or at all) > ? If not, then they should not be in this "official" picture. > Pasi > > On 11/13/2017 07:03 PM, Kenny Paul wrote: >> As was

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

I agree, we don’t need to mention commercial cloud solution in our architecture Regards Jamil Le 14 nov. 2017 à 14:06, Pasi Vaananen > a écrit : Are Azure & AMZ clouds really supported in Amsterdam as NFVI+VIM (or at all) ? If not, then they

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

Are Azure & AMZ clouds really supported in Amsterdam as NFVI+VIM (or at all) ? If not, then they should not be in this "official" picture. Pasi On 11/13/2017 07:03 PM, Kenny Paul wrote: > As was pointed out in Paris there are too many variations of the > Amsterdam architecture which is bad to

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

, November 14, 2017 3:13 AM To: onap-discuss <onap-disc...@lists.onap.org>; onap-tsc <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org> Cc: Lisa Caywood <lcayw...@linuxfoundation.org> Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide Should be fixed. I’ve been using Confluence since 2010

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

Hello Kenny I have a question on the ETSI aligned of VFC module, to my knowledge the VFC interfaces are not aligned with ETSI NFV. I think we need to remove this term from VFC and to add that ONAP architecture is Functionally aligned with ETSI NFV. Regards Jamil De :

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

Should be fixed. I’ve been using Confluence since 2010 and I just learned something new tonight :-} Also, I'm not sure how the same word can be misspelled 3 times in an email and not flagged as an error until I reply. Best Regards, -kenny Kenny Paul, Technical Program Manager