[PEIRCE-L] RE: [Sadhu Sanga] Which came first, consciousness or the brain?

2017-08-09 Thread Stephen Jarosek
>”In fact, the old split-brain experiments are also very interesting.” Yes, they are very interesting. It is also curious, to me, that the discourse around split-brain experiments doesn’t seem to venture beyond the two separated hemispheres. At the risk of overstating the obvious… Is it not

[PEIRCE-L] RE: [Sadhu Sanga] Which came first, consciousness or the brain?

2017-08-09 Thread Stephen Jarosek
And while we are on the topic of DNA entanglement, we should feast our eyes on the following link. What might this suggest? http://www.sciencealert.com/dna-replication-has-been-filmed-for-the-first-time-and-it-s-stranger-than-we-thought From: Stephen Jarosek [mailto:sjaro...@iinet.net.au]

[PEIRCE-L] RE: [Sadhu Sanga] Which came first, consciousness or the brain?

2017-08-09 Thread Stephen Jarosek
Phew boy, Paul… there is so much interdisciplinary stuff here… where do I begin? Let’s tackle our basic assumptions first: 1) Systems theory, complexity theory, Prigogine, Pribram, emergence, etc, I’ve had solid exposure to most of it. I’ve been involved in online forums with Eshel Ben

[PEIRCE-L] RE: [Sadhu Sanga] Which came first, consciousness or the brain?

2017-08-09 Thread Stephen Jarosek
>” Each neuron has its own mind just like each quantum particle has a mind and >free will to make a choice within the governance of the universal laws of >conservation of mass/energy/space/time. The laws govern the observed unity and >collective order in cosmos and represent the consciousness