On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> Hey Justin,
>
> Thanks for the advice. On the next one of these types of things, we'll do a
> [PROPOSAL] first, then wait a few days, and see what people think, and then
> move to JIRA after that, reff'ing the mail archives as yo
Hey Justin,
Thanks for the advice. On the next one of these types of things, we'll do a
[PROPOSAL] first, then wait a few days, and see what people think, and then
move to JIRA after that, reff'ing the mail archives as you suggested.
Personally I'm a fan of more JIRA issues than not, but I unde
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> +1 from me. I think it's a good reorg, and we should move towards a single
> source release artifact under 1 trunk, with sync'ed versions...
My suggestion is that rather than putting things like this in the
JIRA, I'd bring the p
+1 from me. I think it's a good reorg, and we should move towards a single
source release artifact under 1 trunk, with sync'ed versions...
Cheers,
Chris
On 3/18/10 1:38 PM, "Brian Foster" wrote:
Hey guys . . . i created OODT-15 on Apache JIRA . . . open for
comments . . . if none are recei
Hey guys . . . i created OODT-15 on Apache JIRA . . . open for
comments . . . if none are received by next week, i will begin
implementation . . . pretty big change purposed here . . . as noted in
issue description, this came from a discussion i had with Chris
Mattmann.
-brian
