Hey Sean,
Great idea. I think tying it into the Maven build would be a real help,
especially for someone like me whose first inclination is to type mvn install.
Let's file an issue to update this post 0.1-incubating. As far as what other
projects do, I know that Avro has some Python bindings
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 5:29 PM, david woollard wooll...@gmail.com wrote:
[X] +1 Release the packages as Apache OODT 0.1-incubating
Just did a visual comparison (diff -ru) between RC1 and RC4. Changes look fine.
+1 for release.
Thanks. -- justin
Hi,
[x] +1 Release the packages as Apache OODT 0.1-incubating
FTR, the SHA1 checksum of the source archive I checked is
41a8ea1222d591a168a3bb2382c9236cfe6e6668.
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:29 AM, david woollard wooll...@gmail.com wrote:
The release was made from the OODT 0.1-incubating branch
On Nov 1, 2010, at 1:18 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
[x] +1 Release the packages as Apache OODT 0.1-incubating
FTR, the SHA1 checksum of the source archive I checked is
41a8ea1222d591a168a3bb2382c9236cfe6e6668.
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:29 AM, david woollard wooll...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
The release doesn't need to be tagged?
It's...uh...version controlled. So, it's still easy to create a tag:
svn cp
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/oodt/branches/0.1-incubat...@1029464
Yeah the intention is to tag it from the branch we're VOTE'ing on after the
VOTE is approved per our release process [1].
Thanks for VOTE'ing guys!
Cheers,
Chris
[1] http://bit.ly/d5ugid
On 11/1/10 2:19 PM, Justin Erenkrantz jus...@erenkrantz.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Alan
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Yeah the intention is to tag it from the branch we're VOTE'ing on
after the VOTE is approved per our release process [1].
Why wait? The vote is about this exact set of bits, so everything's
Hey Jukka,
We can definitely tag what we got right now and it would work fine. The
intention of the wiki page I made [1] was the RC branch is created first, then
VOTE'd on, if we find issues then we update the branch as needed and call
another VOTE. Once the VOTE passes, we tag the blessed
+1 to release RC4
-brian
On Nov 1, 2010, at 2:26 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Yeah the intention is to tag it from the branch we're VOTE'ing on after the
VOTE is approved per our release process [1].
Thanks for VOTE'ing guys!
Cheers,
Chris
[1] http://bit.ly/d5ugid
On
You could tag both the RC and the final (GA) release. (That's what
Subversion does.)
Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote on Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 15:18:29 -0700:
Hey Jukka,
We can definitely tag what we got right now and it would work fine.
The intention of the wiki page I made [1] was the RC
Looks like the 4th time is the charm.
+1 to release OODT 0.1-incubating
Cameron
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Ian Holsman li...@holsman.net wrote:
[X] +1 Release the packages as Apache OODT 0.1-incubating
[ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...
gratz.
--
-Sent
[X] +1 Release the packages as Apache OODT 0.1-incubating
[ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...
gratz.
12 matches
Mail list logo