Re: Population of ooo-security

On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 08:06 +0200, André Schnabel wrote: > Hi Rob, > > Am 28.07.2011 04:08, schrieb Rob Weir: > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton > > wrote: > >> Now that we've confirmed that the ooo-security list exists and the three > >> moderators appear to be subscribers

Re: Population of ooo-security

Hi Rob, Am 28.07.2011 04:08, schrieb Rob Weir: On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: Now that we've confirmed that the ooo-security list exists and the three moderators appear to be subscribers, I believe the next action is to subscribe the existing OO.o/LibreOffice secu

Re: OOO340 to svn

On Jul 27, 2011, at 9:41 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 21:23, Dennis E. Hamilton > wrote: >> TBD = To Be Determined/Defined >> >> There was extensive discussion with Greg Stein and Marcus (and others) in >> previous weeks on this list. Greg's last post was July 9, as previou

Converting the repo using mercurial's convert extension (was: OOO340 to svn)

Hi *, On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > Can we review what has been attempted and what has failed?  I want to > make sure we understand the dead-ends, so we don't retrace them. > [...] > 2) I assume someone has tried the Hg "convert" extensions, e.g.,  hg > convert --dest-type s

Re: OOO340 to svn

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 21:23, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > TBD = To Be Determined/Defined > > There was extensive discussion with Greg Stein and Marcus (and others) in > previous weeks on this list.  Greg's last post was July 9, as previously > noted.  There has been further work/discussion by M

Re: OOO340 to svn

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > TBD = To Be Determined/Defined > > There was extensive discussion with Greg Stein and Marcus (and others) in > previous weeks on this list.  Greg's last post was July 9, as previously > noted.  There has been further work/discussion by

Re: Population of ooo-security

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > Now that we've confirmed that the ooo-security list exists and the three > moderators appear to be subscribers, I believe the next action is to > subscribe the existing OO.o/LibreOffice security folk, per > >

Population of ooo-security

Now that we've confirmed that the ooo-security list exists and the three moderators appear to be subscribers, I believe the next action is to subscribe the existing OO.o/LibreOffice security folk, per

RE: OOO340 to svn

TBD = To Be Determined/Defined There was extensive discussion with Greg Stein and Marcus (and others) in previous weeks on this list. Greg's last post was July 9, as previously noted. There has been further work/discussion by Mathias Bauer, Michael Stahl, Marcus Lange, Eike Rathke, and others

RE: No diff from wiki ?

Did you try "Watch" on the Tools button for the page you want to receive update notices about? - Dennis PS: Since this is an open, public wiki, I suspect there is no diffs feed. -Original Message- From: florent andré [mailto:florent.andre-...@4sengines.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2

No diff from wiki ?

Something to configure ? Really helpfull to get update with no duplicate effort for an "hey look at it mail". ++

Re: OOO340 to svn

Recap so far : https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/svn+import+experience Try write details as much for reproducibility. On 07/27/2011 10:14 PM, Rob Weir wrote: Can we review what has been attempted and what has failed? I want to make sure we understand the dead-ends, so we don

Re: OOO340 to svn

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Gavin McDonald wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Rob Weir [mailto:apa...@robweir.com] >> Sent: Thursday, 28 July 2011 6:14 AM >> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Re: OOO340 to svn >> >> Can we review what has been attempted and what has

Re: OOO340 to svn

.. ergh Have you guys not been following what Greg Stein and co have been doing in svn and on this list with regards to a conversion tool? May I really miss something, but what's on single-hg is a hg concatenation tool. This file have this in notice : "See for converting the resulting r

Re: "Major Gaps of OpenOffice Impress 3.3 vs. Microsoft Office PowerPoint"

On Jul 27, 2011, at 1:06 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > http://freesoftware.zona-m.net/major-gaps-of-open-office-impress-versus-microsoft-power-point-what-do-you-think/ > > An interesting read with ideas on areas where we can improve. I am reminded that the PDF Importer extension is wrong to not allow t

RE: OOO340 to svn

> -Original Message- > From: florent andré [mailto:florent.andre-...@4sengines.com] > Sent: Wednesday, 27 July 2011 12:18 AM > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: OOO340 to svn > > > > On 07/26/2011 03:53 PM, Michael Stahl wrote: > > On 26.07.2011 13:51, florent andré wrote

RE: OOO340 to svn

> -Original Message- > From: Rob Weir [mailto:apa...@robweir.com] > Sent: Thursday, 28 July 2011 6:14 AM > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: OOO340 to svn > > Can we review what has been attempted and what has failed? I want to > make sure we understand the dead-ends, so w

Re: OOO340 to svn

Can we review what has been attempted and what has failed? I want to make sure we understand the dead-ends, so we don't retrace them. 1) Have we tried posting to the Apache subversion user list? Perhaps someone there has an idea or tool that we have not thought of? Or maybe this would be an int

"Major Gaps of OpenOffice Impress 3.3 vs. Microsoft Office PowerPoint"

http://freesoftware.zona-m.net/major-gaps-of-open-office-impress-versus-microsoft-power-point-what-do-you-think/ An interesting read with ideas on areas where we can improve. -Rob

Re: OOO340 to svn

I manage(d) another try : hg --> git This is currently in process. After 20h a little bit more than 18 rev are exported to git. Will wait some hours more to see what append, but so far so good. git --> svn This is the second step of my idea, in order to see if it's more faster with this

Re: OOO340 to svn

Comments inside On 07/26/2011 05:44 PM, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: --- On Tue, 7/26/11, Christian Lohmaier wrote: Well, do some over-the-thumb-maths please and see that this approach is doomed. 26 linear revisions (the "easy part"), and you can do 500 in two hours. You need around 1040 ho