On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
--- Sab 17/12/11, Michael Meeks ha scritto:
Sure - if it is easier for us to include
an existing feature, under an
acceptable license into LibreOffice why would we bother
re-writing it ?
conversely if it is easier
OK. Now I encourage you to check the following pages.
It's fun and very interesting to see what kind of OpenOffice.org
logos they use on their pages.
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenOffice.org
For french tongue, this page is kept to historical reasons.
Now, a new one has been created and named
There are quite a lot of existing FAQs on the OOo wiki. Someone was
organising and sorting them and (I think) working through them doing
updates. (I have no idea if that someone is still around.) Anyone
wanting to work on FAQs should probably become familiar with what's
already there (at least in
Similar to my note about the FAQs, there is a collection of how-tos on
the OOo wiki. These also need to be checked to see if they are out of
date.
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/How_Tos
That page is also a good place to check if you're thinking of writing
a how-to; perhaps
Hi FR,
Thanks.
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 7:51 PM, FR web forum ooofo...@free.fr wrote:
For french tongue, this page is kept to historical reasons.
Now, a new one has been created and named Apache OpenOffice
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/ApacheOpenOffice
I see.
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 12:19, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 11:40, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Hi Jean,
On Dec 17, 2011, at 8:12 PM, Jean Weber wrote:
I could potentially do the same on the Docs portion of the migrated
OOo website, if it's ready
Hi all,
I have found Simple English Wikipedia.
http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simple_English_Wikipedia
It has OpenOffice.org article.
http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenOffice.org
Maybe we have to tell them first about Apache OpenOffice.
:)
Thanks,
khirano
On 2011-12-18 7:01 AM, Jean Weber wrote:
...snip...
Just checking: when editing am I supposed to be in the raw HTML? (This
isn't a problem; I actually prefer to edit in the code. I'm just
checking that I'm not missing something.)
It depends. When editing, you'll be editing the checked-in
Thank you very much, this part i still build and deal with it.
Now i first report another problem,when i arrive the step that make packages.
It appear this message:(This is another build machine (solaris 11 express))
i check this dir unxsoli4.pro/OpenOffice/pkg/install/en-US_witherror/packages/
it
Hi L'oiseau de mer,
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 09:21:03PM +0800, L'oiseau de mer wrote:
Thank you very much, this part i still build and deal with it.
Now i first report another problem,when i arrive the step that make packages.
It appear this message:(This is another build machine (solaris 11
I use version 4.2. from here to download and install:
http://www.epmhome.org/software.php
Ok,thanks, i continue tying..
2011/12/18 Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org:
Hi L'oiseau de mer,
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 09:21:03PM +0800, L'oiseau de mer wrote:
Thank you very much, this part
On Dec 18, 2011, at 8:20 AM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
On 2011-12-18 7:01 AM, Jean Weber wrote:
...snip...
Just checking: when editing am I supposed to be in the raw HTML? (This
isn't a problem; I actually prefer to edit in the code. I'm just
checking that I'm not missing something.)
It
Hi all,
I have found a great feature of the Wikipedia.
If you take a look at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenOffice.org
you will find Languages section on the left-hand side menu.
It lists 73 languages whose wikipedia page have OpenOffice.org article.
1 Afrikaans
2 Alemannisch
3
On Friday 16 Dec 2011 12:03:53 Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Graham Lauder g.a.lau...@gmail.com
wrote:
snip
The evidence actually reveals the complete opposite. A vast vibrant
community with all the tension and foibles that brings with it, that
produced, marketed
Am 18.12.2011 01:06, schrieb Jean Weber:
On 18/12/2011, at 7:58, Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org wrote:
The user is free to pick another directory at install time, right? So
they can make the choice that works best for them.
My (often faulty) memory of recent OOo installs on Windows is that
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Graham Lauder g.a.lau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday 16 Dec 2011 12:03:53 Rob Weir wrote:
snip
Well, that corporate subsidy is gone. The question is how we can
create a sustainable model for this project. What worked before,
based on corporate charity, is not
if this thread is to continue can we return to the original point...
Ian: look even 15 year old schoolkids do really cool stuff
Louis: yeah, we need to empower everyone
That sounds like a great message to me. Our job is to decide how in the
future, not endlesdly debate the past
Ross
(yes, I
--- Dom 18/12/11, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com ha scritto:
...
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 6:38 PM,
Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org
wrote:
--- Sab 17/12/11, Michael Meeks ha scritto:
Sure - if it is easier for us to include
an existing feature, under an
acceptable license
On 18 December 2011 14:57, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Graham Lauder g.a.lau...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Friday 16 Dec 2011 12:03:53 Rob Weir wrote:
snip
In other words you think my views are heretical.
No, they are a political perspective dressed up as
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 December 2011 14:57, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Graham Lauder g.a.lau...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Friday 16 Dec 2011 12:03:53 Rob Weir wrote:
snip
In other words you think my
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 6:37 AM, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote:
Similar to my note about the FAQs, there is a collection of how-tos on
the OOo wiki. These also need to be checked to see if they are out of
date.
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/How_Tos
That page
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18/12/2011, at 9:56, Allen Pulsifer apulsi...@apache.org wrote:
The Apache OpenOffice (incubating) project has tentatively identified
the
first quarter of 2012 for a Version 3.4 release.
I think I would prefer
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
Well one thing that definitely didn't work in the past was alienating
community members with ill-thought out arguments no matter how logical
those arguments might appear to an individual. The community is made of
On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 13:31:19 -0500
Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Ian Lynch
ianrly...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
Well one thing that definitely didn't work in the past was
alienating community members with ill-thought out arguments
no matter how
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote:
On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 13:31:19 -0500
Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Ian Lynch
ianrly...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
Well one thing that definitely didn't work in the past was
alienating
Jean,
Backing up a little. A sketch of the situation just in case there are blanks
that need to be filled in [;). I think you may already be familiar with all
of this, but I want to make sure your question is answered in context.
The way the site is to be maintained, it starts on SVN first
Ah no. Jean is trying to get a feel for the
web interface to the documentation. Jean,
the typical workflow is to go to the live
document on the ooo-site.apache.org page,
then click on the ASF CMS bookmarklet you installed
from the cms.apache.org site. That will
take you (after maybe a minute
JIC you missed it in Slashdot:
http://www.itworld.com/it-managementstrategy/233753/gpl-copyleft-use-declining-faster-ever
Quoting the article:
...
I don't think projects are moving away from GPL, but that new vendors are
choosing community approaches enabled by permissive licenses, rather than
On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 14:48:39 -0500
Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Rory O'Farrell
Quite honestly I am astounded at the amount of infighting and
petty point-scoring that goes on on the Apache OpenOffice
lists. Are you grown, rational beings, or sub
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 05:48, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote:
On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 13:31:19 -0500
Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Ian Lynch
ianrly...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
Well
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 05:48, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote:
On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 13:31:19 -0500
Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Dec
On 17/12/2011 eric b wrote:
the french version pretends
Apache OpenOffice.org ( http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenOffice.org ) is
a fork
We probably should take an eye on the Italian and the German versions.
The Italian one has a terse but accurate description.
Regards,
Andrea.
Marcus,
Thank you for your reply.
On 12/18/2011 10:09 AM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
*IMHO* to create a patch or update for OpenOffice.org and to guarantee
the binary compatibility, you need to use the original environment for
developing, builing, testing.
That is right!
Even so, there are some
Hi,
Le 18 déc. 11 à 11:51, FR web forum a écrit :
OK. Now I encourage you to check the following pages. It's fun and
very interesting to see what kind of OpenOffice.org logos they
use on their pages.
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenOffice.org
For french tongue, this page is kept to
Pedro,
Thank you for your reply.
--- Ven 16/12/11, tora - Takamichi Akiyamat...@openoffice.org ha scritto:
Why not 3.3.0? They say 3.2.1 is conceptually stabler than
3.3.0 since 3.2.1 is a minor, bug-fixed version while 3.3.0
is a major version.
On 12/18/2011 10:29 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hi,
Le 18 déc. 11 à 22:33, tora - Takamichi Akiyama a écrit :
They do not really need new functionality of office suite. What
they really need is the software on which they can do their daily
work.
In other words, I am typing this email on my Windows XP laptop. I
know Windows Vista and
I'm reluctant to add any chaff to the threads that are running around here.
Yet, related to Jean's point, it is important to internalize that here in
Apache territory, forking is a feature, not a failure.
It might be a failure of someone's ambitions, but that is for them to sort out.
Adopting
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 1:34 PM, eric b eric.bach...@free.fr wrote:
Hi,
Le 18 déc. 11 à 11:51, FR web forum a écrit :
OK. Now I encourage you to check the following pages. It's fun and very
interesting to see what kind of OpenOffice.org logos they use on their
pages.
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Could we agree on some place where we can post what build flags we're
using? If we really want to avoid build breakages, I think we need to
start building in the same way. This includes our desk builds, but
also the
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
Eric--
Register and get a WP account and fix it! :)
You don't even need an account. Anyone can edit a Wikipedia article.
However, inserting a point of view regarding what is and isn't a
'fork is not something that
On 16/12/11 18:24, Mathias Bauer wrote:
On 16.12.2011 03:43, Zhe Liu wrote:
Hi All,
I always break because of the error when build on Windows XP. I
mentioned before, nobody responsed on it. I did a little search and
found someone also encountered the problem. I still have no clue how
to
On 17/12/11 06:27, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
This way we can use branches/gbuild to create
further feature branches for gbuild conversion that can not be done on
trunk directly (here I can imagine the desktop module, for example).
errm, yes, converting the desktop module on master (not on a
Am 19.12.2011 00:19, schrieb Michael Stahl:
On 16/12/11 18:24, Mathias Bauer wrote:
On 16.12.2011 03:43, Zhe Liu wrote:
Hi All,
I always break because of the error when build on Windows XP. I
mentioned before, nobody responsed on it. I did a little search and
found someone also encountered
I am going to update the support page (currently at
http://ooo-site.apache.org/support/index.html). FYI, here is what I
intend to do. (If there is a place on the planning wiki for this info,
I'll put it there too.)
* Check all the links and remove or correct any out of date ones.
* Remove all
-Original Message-
From: Jean Weber [mailto:jeanwe...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 19 December 2011 10:35 AM
To: OOo-dev Apache Incubator
Subject: Support page of website - work planned
I am going to update the support page (currently at http://ooo-
On 2011-12-15 6:03 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Graham Lauderg.a.lau...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
The evidence actually reveals the complete opposite. A vast vibrant community
with all the tension and foibles that brings with it, that produced, marketed
and distributed
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:00, Gavin McDonald ga...@16degrees.com.au wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jean Weber [mailto:jeanwe...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 19 December 2011 10:35 AM
To: OOo-dev Apache Incubator
Subject: Support page of website - work planned
I am going to update the
Hi Jean,
Great! Thanks for the heads up. I did tweak that page in the last 24 hours.
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 18, 2011, at 6:35 PM, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote:
I am going to update the support page (currently at
http://ooo-site.apache.org/support/index.html). FYI,
Build Success in Solaris 10 with binfilter.
I modify this file main/solenv/inc/unxsoli4.mk in line 47:
ARCH_FLAGS*=-features=rvalueref
=
But i also modify these file for building pass.
Hi,
I can fix No. 2, but No. 1 doesnt seem right.
Maybe there is a related patch in Solaris
repositories? Alternatively you could use
the system python.
Cheers,
Pedro.
--- Dom 18/12/11, L'oiseau de mer oiseau...@gmail.com ha scritto:
Da: L'oiseau de mer oiseau...@gmail.com
Oggetto: Re:
Some spam on the ooo-users list this evening:
http://markmail.org/message/hqvtj76howq5kmjv
The poster is subscribed to the list. This was not moderated in.
What do we want moderators to do in this case? Warn the user?
Unsubscribe them?
We should probably have a common understanding about how
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 12:42, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Some spam on the ooo-users list this evening:
http://markmail.org/message/hqvtj76howq5kmjv
The poster is subscribed to the list. This was not moderated in.
What do we want moderators to do in this case? Warn the user?
On 12/18/2011 21:55, Jean Weber wrote:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 12:42, Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org wrote:
Some spam on the ooo-users list this evening:
http://markmail.org/message/hqvtj76howq5kmjv
The poster is subscribed to the list. This was not moderated in.
What do we want moderators to
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, 19 December 2011 12:42 PM
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: What do we want to do with spam on lists?
Some spam on the ooo-users list this evening:
http://markmail.org/message/hqvtj76howq5kmjv
I took care of it as soon as I saw it (after being away all day and returning
about an hour ago). The user is unsubscribed.
Unsubscribing an user is not the same as banning.
Subscription requests are not moderated on ooo-users, so there is not much else
to do instead.
My only concern is how
On 2011-12-16 07:07, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Dec 14, 2011, at 7:38 AM, Dwayne Bailey wrote:
On 2011-12-13 23:49, Gavin McDonald wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Ross Gardler [mailto:rgard...@opendirective.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 14 December 2011 12:39 AM
To:
On 12/18/2011 5:54 PM, L'oiseau de mer wrote:
Build Success in Solaris 10 with binfilter.
Can you share your complete build 'recipe' for Solaris?
- What is the full version of you OS and what packages have you added
in order to build AOO?
- What are the exact commands you run to build?
-
On 12/18/2011 10:33 PM, tora - Takamichi Akiyama wrote:
Again, does anyone know any information or the best person to contact?
CVE-2010-4253
Security Vulnerability in OpenOffice.org related to PNG file processing
http://www.openoffice.org/security/cves/CVE-2010-4253.html
I identified the
Hi Herbert,
On 12/19/2011 3:24 PM, Herbert Duerr wrote:
CVE-2010-4253
Security Vulnerability in OpenOffice.org related to PNG file processing
http://www.openoffice.org/security/cves/CVE-2010-4253.html
I identified the relevant patch and sent it to Tora.
Thanks a lot!
Tora
59 matches
Mail list logo
