Hello,
Rob Weir schrieb:
I'm talking about final sign-off. Of course, normal Apache principles
apply here. Our work is done openly, on the mailing lists.
Transparency is important.
OK
The fact that we have consumer users does not mean that project
members can issue press releases
04 марта 2012, 01:53 от Очиров Николай nvochi...@yandex.ru:
Hi! I have no experience building openoffice, and I have a problem.
I followed these instructions
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide for
Ubuntu 11.04, but used 11.10.
When I run the script
Hello,
Rob Weir schrieb:
We have no formal project subdivisions that have authority to issue
their own press releases.
OK, clear. (i did not know before)
How could it be otherwise that we would want a press release about
the project/product in the name of the project not to be reviewed by
Is there a particular reason you're using a different font and layout
than the normal AOO logo? Has the FreeBSD port usually had a very
different logo than past OOO builds?
I really like the license underneath, and the small daemon on the
corner, almost as if he's looking in to seeing what's
Hi Shane;
On 03/04/12 09:53, Shane Curcuru wrote:
Is there a particular reason you're using a different font and layout
than the normal AOO logo? Has the FreeBSD port usually had a very
different logo than past OOO builds?
Mainly because I don't like the normal AOO logo and I wanted to
Hi all,
We migrated also the Templates website over to sourceforge hardware.
We've restored authentication with the openoffice.org accounts, and
make some minor updates (e.g. changing some wording, deleting some
references to openoffice.org accounts, etc).
As of today, the Templates website is
Hi! The command cd instsetoo_native build - all - html-P2 --- P2
got error build: command not found. Why not? I did everything according to
instructions!
04.03.2012, 08:58, Andrew Rist andrew.r...@oracle.com:
On 3/3/2012 1:52 PM, Очиров Николай wrote:
Hi! I have no experience building
On 03/04/12 10:53, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
Hi all,
We migrated also the Templates website over to sourceforge hardware.
We've restored authentication with the openoffice.org accounts, and
make some minor updates (e.g. changing some wording, deleting some
references to openoffice.org accounts,
Just to add my observations.
Installed on Vista and Win7
- both machines running Avast vs Symantec.
- both cases Avast also notes to the user the exe and msi are unsigned
and offers to run them in a sandbox.
- After install as each of the modules is run for the fist time (swriter
vs soffice)
Hi Folks,
With the Oracle infrastructure going away we are in danger of losing the legacy
downloads and the root of the MirrorBrain network.
Also it turns out that the Extensions site uses the url
updateexte.services.openoffice.org for updates and that url points to
Rob, I want to make sure that signature verification and AV scanning activities
are not being confused together.
My AV scanned the OOo-Dev Windows x86 en-US .exe of the r1293550 developer
preview checked the .exe and its interior components (all 51916 of them, if the
count is to be believed)
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Rob, I want to make sure that signature verification and AV scanning
activities are not being confused together.
I'm not confused.
My AV scanned the OOo-Dev Windows x86 en-US .exe of the r1293550 developer
Hello,
If you try to access:
This space is managed by SourceForge.net. You have
attempted to access a URL that either never existed
or is no longer active. Please check the source of
your link and/or contact the maintainer of the link
to have them update their records.
Maybe another more
Just to be clear, further, the reputation warning on my Windows configuration
is neither from the Windows Installer nor the AV that I have installed. It is
the file downloader that is part of Internet Explorer 9. Later, there is a
Windows OS warning on attempted execution of the download.
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Just to be clear, further, the reputation warning on my Windows configuration
is neither from the Windows Installer nor the AV that I have installed. It
is the file downloader that is part of Internet Explorer
On 03/04/2012 11:02 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
Hi Folks,
With the Oracle infrastructure going away we are in danger of losing the legacy
downloads and the root of the MirrorBrain network.
Also it turns out that the Extensions site uses the url
updateexte.services.openoffice.org for updates and
Am 03/04/2012 08:02 PM, schrieb Dave Fisher:
With the Oracle infrastructure going away we are in danger of losing the legacy
downloads and the root of the MirrorBrain network.
I haven't realised that this counts also for the download webserver. I
thought for mail services only.
Also it
Gee Rob, my e-mail client shows a different, appropriate subject to the present
thread.
The branch had to do with understanding the difference between reputational
warnings and actual malware detections (and false positives), and the variety
of ways these things occur. It makes need for
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Gee Rob, my e-mail client shows a different, appropriate subject to the
present thread.
The branch had to do with understanding the difference between reputational
warnings and actual malware detections (and
19 matches
Mail list logo
