Time to say goodbye to Mac OS PPC, IMHO.
Malte.
On 04.01.2012 19:09, Rob Weir wrote:
Last week I posted a note pointing to a draft 3.4 release plan on the wiki:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4+Release+Plan
A few of you have step up to volunteer for some tasks.
Hi Rob,
On 28.12.2011 20:23, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Malte Timmermann
malte_timmerm...@gmx.com wrote:
Hi Rob,
thanks for clarification :)
I still wonder: There must be some common code between these two apps.
The ODF filter, the DOM and the renderings stuff (well
+1, makes sense to me :)
On 22.11.2011 00:46, Rob Weir wrote:
We have with this project something that most other Apache projects
don't have and which the legacy OOo project never had. We have two
independent websites.
We have the legacy www.openoffice.org website, which served as an
end-user
+1 to Rob's and Simon's suggestion.
I really have no interest in keeping my @openoffice.org email forward,
as it's only good for receiving lots of Spam.
Malte.
On 21.11.2011 18:41, Simon Phipps wrote:
On 21 Nov 2011, at 17:27, Rob Weir wrote:
1) Check with Andrew on the latest date where
Although this is not a [VOTE], +1 from my side.
Malte.
On 19.10.2011 01:05, Rob Weir wrote:
ooo-security is the project's private list for receiving and resolving
security vulnerability reports. Juergen has volunteered to
participate on that list, joining Dennis, Malte, Wolf and myself.
If
What's this thread about - OOo/AOOo/TDF private security lists war
reloaded? ;)
To sum up:
- Apache mentors/PPMCs made clear that only AOOo committers can be on
the AOOo Security list (ooo-secur...@incubator.apache.org).
Regardless of whether or not this rule makes sense in this special case
approve members if they try to subscribe. Not sure.
Malte.
On 10.10.2011 18:54, Shane Curcuru wrote:
On 10/10/2011 12:33 PM, Malte Timmermann wrote:
...snip...
- Which leaves us with 1 common list where we don't have such
restrictive rules, and can continue with our cooperation: The
old/original
Hi TJ,
On 10.10.2011 18:51, TJ Frazier wrote:
Assuming that you are the mt listed as an administrator on the OO.o
security project, that should make you an owner of the securityteam ML.
In theory - but unfortunatly the list is not but of the security
project, but of the WWW project (because
: [libreoffice-accessibility] Re: OpenOffice.org code on
Apache: IAccessible2 ?
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 10:32:38 +0200
From: Malte Timmermann malte_timmerm...@gmx.com
To: accessibil...@global.libreoffice.org
Michael Stahl and Dennis Hamilton are right wrt IA2 CWSes listed below.
accfixes2 is ready for QA
On 28.07.2011 12:37, Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi Greg,
On Thursday, 2011-07-28 00:41:40 -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
1) import just the OOO340 tip into svn
2) move all the Hg repositories over to apache-extras.org. That
supports Hg and it supports any OSI license. We can indefinitely
retain history
After initiating the OOo security team 5 years ago, and doing most of
the coordination stuff for OOo security fixes, please let me allow to
state my pov wrt ooo-security :)
ooo-security is _not_ a mailing list where all people interested in
security related stuff can discuss fancy things.
Having extensions separated from the source tree of the core product
doesn't mean they can't be part of some installation set.
This is just about packaging then.
Malte.
On 22.07.2011 17:11, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
--- On Fri, 7/22/11, Malte Timmermannmalte.timmerm...@gmx.com wrote:
Wrt
Thanks Ross! ;)
Actually I had planned/registered to attend the ODF Plugfest, especially
to meet people from the Apache OOo project, but then couldn't make it...
Well, I guess there will be other opportunities to do so in the future :)
Best,
Malte.
On 19.07.2011 16:33, Ross Gardler wrote:
Wrt PDF Import Extension, and similar extensions: Optional extensions
should not be part of a regular OOo build or source tree, IMHO.
We should have separate source trees for the core product, and for
optional extensions.
Malte.
On 18.07.2011 20:21, Mathias Bauer wrote:
On 18.07.2011
Thanks Ross! ;)
Actually I had planned/registered to attend the ODF Plugfest, especially
to meet people from the Apache OOo project, but then couldn't make it...
Well, I guess there will be other opportunities to do so in the future :)
Best,
Malte.
On 19.07.2011 16:33, Ross Gardler wrote:
That's a pity - GullFOSS really should stay available as an archive.
I will try to find someone at Oracle who can help with this...
Malte.
On 19.07.2011 10:55, Herbert Duerr wrote:
I'm wondering whether the Oracle owned blogs on OOo will be contributed
to the Apache project too? E.g. having
Cool - thanks for clarification! :)
Malte.
On 19.07.2011 01:54, Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 7:20 AM, Malte Timmermann
malte_timmerm...@gmx.com wrote:
Hi Erik,
thanks for clarifications :)
Some questions below...
On 14.07.2011 05:09, Yong Lin Ma wrote:
...
We are willing
Hi Rob,
this is really interesting and great news! :)
Some comments inline...
On 14.07.2011 00:00, Rob Weir wrote:
...
However, we at IBM have not been exemplary community members when it
came to OpenOffice.org.
;)
..
First, we're going to contribute the standalone version of Lotus
+1 for having ooo-secur...@incubator.apache.org, because
- old OOo mailing lists will probably die some day
- other people are now participating in Apache OOo, who don't work
on OOo/LO
- (Old) OOo doesn't release security updates anymore, I guess.
I am still on vacation until 06/25. That the
19 matches
Mail list logo
