Hi Ross;
I don't think it's "my turn" since my issues remain unresolved.
However let me recap:
1) I think just having patches that can or cannot be applied
to category-B licensed code is OK as long as it is not the
default.
2) I don't think we are allowed to distribute source tarballs
in subve
--- Ven 1/6/12, Rob Weir ha scritto:
...
> >
> > And computers need electricity, which is not free and
> > not available under a compatible license. I wish you
> > could keep focused or at least do an effort to
> > understand the issues so we can solve them.
> >
>
> Be nice.
>
Couldn't resist
Ugh ...
--- Ven 1/6/12, Rob Weir ha scritto:
...
>
> No release is buildable on its own. You need an
> operating system, a compiler, often other pre-existing
> libraries on the system, other prerequisites that need
> to be installed by the developers.
>
And computers need electricity, which
rom there. That would mean a further huge burden to
make the development for AOO more complicate.
I hope this helps
Juergen
On 6/1/12 11:07 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 1 June 2012 09:50, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 6/1/12 9:47 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
Sent from my mobile device, please forgiv
Hi Jürgen;
On 06/01/12 03:16, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 5/31/12 6:26 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
...
First of all we should clarify what a source release is in this context.
Does our source release contain Category-A tarballs? In other
words, does this file:
http://www.apache.org/dyn/aoo
Hi Jürgen;
Let me clarify some issues too ...
On 05/31/12 10:39, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
...
let me explain some details here because I think they can help to
understand.
1. we have dependencies to several external libraries including
category-b for some features
2. we have checked in all this s
--- Mer 30/5/12, Rob Weir ha scritto:
> >
> > So *NOW* you are admitting that those tarballs are
> part
> > of the Release??
> >
>
> Not at all. But they are referenced from build
> files. I hope this distinction is clear.
No. If they are just referenced then we don't depend
on having them
Oh boy ...
--- Mer 30/5/12, Rob Weir ha scritto:
...
>
> You can copy the category-b binaries someplace else, but you
> must not remove the ones that are already here. Otherwise you
> will break not only the buildbots, but you will also break
> every one who has downloaded the source from our
Thanks Andre!
On 05/30/12 04:34, Andre Fischer wrote:
...
But the binary builds have to come from somewhere. Unless we want to
drop the features for which we need category-B libraries then making
it harder to build them is IMHO not the right way to go.
But maybe moving the offending librari
--- Mer 30/5/12, Louis Suárez-Potts ha scritto:
>
> On 2012-05-30, at 11:05 , Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>
> >
> > I will do this next week. I will probably use Apache
> extras and
> > at a later time we could leave there the old GPL'd
> stuff too
>
Hi Andre;
--- Mer 30/5/12, Andre Fischer ha scritto:
...
> >
> > The idea that we have remaining issues with Category-B
> > tarballs in the tree has been around since before the
> > release, and one of our mentors (Ross I recall) did
> > acknowledge my point of view.
> >
> > I did offer to step
Hi;
--- Mar 29/5/12, sebb ha scritto:
...
> >
> > This is admittedly a stop gap solution to comply
> > better with the Apache policies, the real fix would
> > be to work collectively on replacing the code that
> > can be replaced:
>
> Alternatively, it is possible to include cat B [1]
> depende
--- Mar 29/5/12, Rob Weir ha scritto:
...
> >
> > The idea that we have remaining issues with Category-B
> > tarballs in the tree has been around since before the
> > release, and one of our mentors (Ross I recall) did
> > acknowledge my point of view.
> >
>
> Again, I don't see an issue here.
Hi Dave;
--- Mar 29/5/12, Dave Fisher ha scritto:
...
>
> There are issues with these embedded convenience packages.
>
> (1) Some are Category B. An issue to some more than others.
>
> (2) Some are patched versions of existing open-source
> packages. We should attempt to push these upstream. T
Hi Drew;
--- Mar 29/5/12, drew ha scritto:
> > >> >>
>> >> Yes the situation was specifically postponed as a graduation
>> >> issue, I am not going through that discussion again.
>> >>
>> >> I made a concrete proposal with two alternatives:
>> >>
>> >> - They are moved to a friendly ftp/http s
--- Lun 28/5/12, Rob Weir ha scritto:
> But just to be clear, if it is found out, after
> investigation, that what we're doing is within
> Apache policies, will you still oppose this?
>
If it were declared by legal to be OK, of course
I wouldn't oppose. It is not really in my
agenda to have
On 05/28/12 15:42, Rob Weir wrote:
I won't spend any more energy on the issue but feel free to
do all the consultations you want, and don't take the second
alternative as a threat.
How should I take it then?
It's something that has to be sorted out, and in lack of a
specific response my sug
On 05/28/12 15:00, Rob Weir wrote:
...
Yes the situation was specifically postponed as a graduation
issue, I am not going through that discussion again.
I made a concrete proposal with two alternatives:
- They are moved to a friendly ftp/http site.
- I step down from the PPMC to avoid the com
On 05/28/12 14:25, Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hi Rob;
On 05/28/12 13:10, Rob Weir wrote:
I'd like to start the graduation process, with the aim of being a TLP
in time for the 3.4.1 release.
The IPMC has a "Guide to Successful Graduation&
Hi Rob;
On 05/28/12 13:10, Rob Weir wrote:
I'd like to start the graduation process, with the aim of being a TLP
in time for the 3.4.1 release.
The IPMC has a "Guide to Successful Graduation" page with a lot of
detail and advice: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html
The calendar
Bah.. Drew got ahead of me :-P.
Guy, perhaps you can help us clean this old database?
http://www.openoffice.org/fr/Marketing/entreprises.html#france
just let me know what to drop, I feel like grinding my axe today ;).
Pedro.
On 05/27/12 06:23, Guy Waterval wrote:
Hi Dave,
Hi all,
2012/5/27
--- Dom 27/5/12, Guy Waterval ha scritto:
> There are other problems of this type, for instance, the fr
> webpage of the
> AOO project :
>
> http://www.openoffice.org/fr/
>
> You will see a link "Boutique OpenOffice.org", pointing to
> the fr OOo.org former store, now in the hands of LibO :
On 05/24/12 20:20, Rich Reynolds wrote:
hi all -
anyone know of the above port happening?
rich
I don't think so. My understanding is that gcc was never
well supported on Solaris.
We have seen reports of success (after minor changes)
with Sun's compiler though.
Cheers,
Pedro.
On 05/23/12 14:58, Donald Whytock wrote:
Um, guys? As this concerns a LibreOffice webpage over which the AOO
committers largely have no control, is it better to have this argument
here or on a LibreOffice-related list?
Don
Hmm.. yes that was my last comment :).
(back to coding)
Pedro.
On 05/23/12 11:49, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi Pedro,
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 10:36 -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
There are no details of the relicensing process but doesn't look
very clean to me:
- They are basically assuming that OOo 3.3.x (where they started
has been relicensed under ALv2, whi
On 05/23/12 11:21, Andrew Rist wrote:
As part of the transfer of the web properties of OOo to the ASF, the
set of related domains has also been offered to ASF.
We (PPMC) need to decide what we want to do with the related domains.
There are three obvious options available to us:
* Ignore and
FWIW,
And with the traditional IANAL disclaimer:
On 05/23/12 08:43, Shane Curcuru wrote:
In case folks haven't seen this:
http://legal-discuss.markmail.org/thread/mleqsm636zf5fqia
Which points to:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Relicensing
There are no details of the
Well ...
Instead of changing the license to suit your wishes
I would suggest using another Category-A license
for your contribution: ASL 1.1, for example.
best regards,
Pedro.
--- Mar 22/5/12, Guy Waterval ha scritto:
> Hi all,
>
> Can anyone tell me if the Apache license allows, for a
> doc
d the
code :).
cheers,
Pedro.
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hi;
I looked at it briefly and it was nice to see it already
has some of the AOO 3.4 enhancements. I also noticed icu
has been updated which is great.
This is very exciting ... thanks IBM!
Pedro.
--- Dom 20
On 05/20/12 11:14, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hi Dennis;
--- Sab 19/5/12, Dennis E. Hamilton ha scritto:
...
One enduring solution would be to
break with the past and not use the same file names for the
binary bits, the same registry keys, etc
Hi;
I looked at it briefly and it was nice to see it already
has some of the AOO 3.4 enhancements. I also noticed icu
has been updated which is great.
This is very exciting ... thanks IBM!
Pedro.
--- Dom 20/5/12, Rob Weir ha scritto:
> The JIRA issue for loading the
> Symphony dump is here:
>
--- Dom 20/5/12, win ha scritto:
> On 05/20/2012 05:55 PM, Ariel
> Constenla-Haile wrote:
> > Hi Marco,
> >
> > On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 05:09:11PM +0100, Marco
> A.G.Pinto wrote:
> >> Hello!
> >>
> >> I was wondering if the extension "LanguageTool" (
> >> http://www.languagetool.org ) could b
Hello guys.. very interesting discussion.
I am new to OpenOffice.org and indeed new to Apache and I
am basically the result of both organizations coming together.
On 05/20/12 16:11, Paulo de Souza Lima wrote:
...
Keep in mind the following: OpenOffice.org community has passed through a
traumat
--- Sab 19/5/12, Dennis E. Hamilton ha scritto:
> Better for who? [;<)
>
Power users that may want, for example, to run two different
Office suites at the same time. :-P.
Pedro.
> -Original Message-----
> From: Pedro Giffuni [mailto:p...@apache.org]
> Sent: Saturda
--- Sab 19/5/12, Regina Henschel ha scritto:
...
> Hi,
>
> I have attached the patch to
> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=3582.
>
> If someone might look at it?
>
> I'll try to push it myself, but need some guide, see other
> mail.
>
Don't be afraid to give it a try .. we like t
Hi Dennis;
--- Sab 19/5/12, Dennis E. Hamilton ha scritto:
...
> One enduring solution would be to
> break with the past and not use the same file names for the
> binary bits, the same registry keys, etc., any longer.
A better solution is to move to FreeBSD or PC-BSD :).
Pedro.
--- Sab 19/5/12, Ariel Constenla-Haile ha scritto:
...
> Hi Dennis,
>
> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 11:24:22AM -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton
> wrote:
> > I see that you submitted the patch.
> >
> > There is no way to do commits to Apache OpenOffice via
> > GIT.
>
> sorry but that's not true: I've been
On 05/18/12 15:52, Kayo Hamid wrote:
From ooo-qa. We can see a lot old bugs on issues.apache.org. Can we begin
removing? It's a key thing for project? I volunteer to this.
Eg, https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=4549 (10 years old)
+1
Hi Drew;
--- Ven 18/5/12, drew ha scritto:
...
> >
> > I opened a JIRA issue:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4816
> >
> > I think infra has actually no obligation to work
> > on this as MW is not officially supported here. I
> > even volunteered to help but I actually don'
Hello;
--- Ven 18/5/12, Paulo de Souza Lima ha scritto:
...
>
> > But what do you want to do?
> >
>
> I want to upgrade Mediawiki to MW 1.19.x or, if it's not
> possible, at least to 1.17.4, and install some useful
> extensions. This shall not impact any actual function,
> but will provide us to
Hello bo.tian
Welcome!
--- Gio 17/5/12, bo.tian ha scritto:
>
> Hi, I am a loyal user of Openoffice.org.I am working for
> cs2c now.
> I am very glad to be a "bugkiller" here,making AOO better to
> use.
> I come up with a fix of Issue112701.
> click here to see the patch:
> https://issues.apa
On 05/11/12 17:40, Hagar Delest wrote:
Le sam. 12 mai 2012 00:07:35 CEST, Pedro Giffuni a écrit :
I would suggest:
"User community support forum for Apache OpenOffice
and all the OpenOffice.org derivatives"
There's no need to favor any particular fork.
This was my first
I don't really use WikiMedia but you may want to add
this page:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Optimization_Solver
That code was never part of OpenOffice and may be lead
to confusion wrt to the new solver code.
best regards,
Pedro.
--- Gio 17/5/12, Paulo de Souza Lima ha scritto:
Hi,
On 05/16/12 15:07, Kay Schenk wrote:
On 05/16/2012 11:48 AM, � wrote:
Dear Confused,
My reply is long; short answer: Porting evolved, and there were those
builds maintained by Sun for its clients and then there were those
initiated and maintained by the community. Over time, the roster o
On 05/15/12 07:23, Roberto Resoli wrote:
2012/5/15 Pedro Giffuni:
Hello,
...
what is used of Tomcat for inside AOO? Do you mean the
entire Tomcat API or
the Servlet part only? I tried to find some info about
this, having
found Tomcat update
notice inside AOO 3.4 release notes. Cold you point
Hello,
--- Mar 15/5/12, Roberto Resoli ha scritto:
...
> 2012/5/14 Pedro Giffuni :
> > Hello Andor;
>
> Hello Andor, Pedro
>
> > --- Lun 14/5/12, Andor E
> ha scritto:
> > ...
> >> Data: Lunedì 14 maggio 2012, 08:35
> >> Hi,
> >
Hello Andor;
--- Lun 14/5/12, Andor E ha scritto:
...
> Data: Lunedì 14 maggio 2012, 08:35
> Hi,
> I have just started to test AO 3.4 with our extension
> (WollMux) and ran into trouble right at the start. One
> part of our software is an external Swing GUI that
> connects to OOo/AO via bootstrap
teer in Brazil for
> the translation of
> > manuals for Portuguese language (Brazil), I believe in
> the same way these
> > manuals (esttilos and formatting with some variations)
> and even for
> > creating these.
> > 2012/5/13 Pedro Giffuni
> >
Hello Raul;
On 05/13/12 11:17, Raul Pacheco da Silva wrote:
Good morning, I am a simple end user and fan of this software and am not
very good thing in these licenses, and would assist the project with the
translation of manuals as I did with the LO, manuals found on this page of
the wiki:
http
On 05/13/12 08:57, Rob Weir wrote:
...
Whew! I thought I was the only non-perfect person here ;-)
:)
But seriously, no large development effort can ever rely on perfect
(or near-perfect) developers. That approach doesn't scale. We need
to rely on an overall process that can efficiently fi
On 05/13/12 09:10, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Hi Pedro,
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 08:24:00PM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
To respond your points, which are perfectly reasonable, in the
case of these last two big changes:
1) The code builds on FreeBSD-amd64, which is my dev. platform.
2) The
Hi Ariel;
On 05/12/12 16:10, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Hi Pedro,
...
IMO when updating external dependencies, the tests should not only include
the fact that it can be built on all the platforms we support, but
mainly regressions tests that test if the functionality of the code that
dependes
Hello;
Revision 1337602 updates Apache Lucene to version 2.9.4. It's the
last update for Apache based packages that I have planned. It
also brings in a patch so that more modern versions can be used
as external libraries.
The change is rather big and I have a lot of unrelated patches in
my build
e to the content.
>
> My question is Under $SRC_ROOT Directory, dmake
> is compiled which file .
>
>
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: Pedro Giffuni [mailto:p...@apache.org]
> 发送时间: 2012年5月12日 11:06
> 收件人: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org;
> jianlizhao
> 主题: R: 答复: abo
Hello Jianlizhao,
--- Ven 11/5/12, jianlizhao ha scritto:
> Hi Pedro,
> I'm sorry, I did not describe my question clearly.
> Re-description as follows:
>
> When we entered the dmake,
> dmake is compiled which file .
>
It depends on the description in makefile.mk.
For example: writerfilter/so
Hi;
Hi Jianlizhao,
--- Ven 11/5/12, laser laser ha scritto:
>
> hello Pedro Giffuni
> Thank you for your reply.
> I would also like to know,
> Build OOo we are using dmake, which file is damke calls the
> first file?
I don't understand well what you mean by firs
+1 Of course !!
Pedro.
On 05/10/12 10:26, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
before we (the AOO project) move on with future work (and we have a
lot in front of us) I would nevertheless send a big THANK YOU to the
infra structure team.
The infra team had a lot of extra work with our project becaus
On 05/11/12 19:38, laser laser wrote:
> Build OOo we are using dmake, which file is damke calls the first file?
> The dmake compiler uses what parameters, How are these parameters passed to
> damke.
>
>
> jianlizhao
Hi;
There is a legacy homepage for dmak
--- Ven 11/5/12, Hagar Delest ha scritto:
...
> Le ven. 11 mai 2012 20:06:45 CEST, FR
> web forum
> a écrit :
>
> >> Do you see them mentionned on the banneer ?
> >> LINK : http://user.services.openoffice.org/fr/forum/
> > And what so? This is not a fact.
> > We have mentioned only the main p
On 05/11/12 03:11, Armin wrote:
Hi Pedro,
xbitmap.hxx is gone, you have old dependencies. use 'make clean' in svx and
be sure to build incompatible from svx.
Sincerely,
Armin
Thanks, I will start a new (clean) build
Pedro.
Hi Drew;
On 05/10/12 16:35, drew jensen wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 16:24 -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hi guys;
For 4.0 we have a task without owner to bring in the hsqldb CWS.
I would like to help in that but I am not good at using Hg and there
appears to be some sort of a mess ... Looking
Doesn't look like one of my changes ;)
gmake: *** No rule to make target
`/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/svx/inc/svx/xbitmap.hxx',
needed by
`/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/solver/340/unxfbsdx.pro/workdir/CxxObject/svx/source/engine3d/obj3d.o'.
Hi guys;
For 4.0 we have a task without owner to bring in the hsqldb CWS.
I would like to help in that but I am not good at using Hg and there
appears to be some sort of a mess ... Looking at the web interface:
http://hg.services.openoffice.org/cws/hsqldb19/
It would appear like there is only
On 05/09/12 12:47, Giuseppe Castagno wrote:
Ciao Pedro,
sorry for the delay but I first had to build AOO, just to be
re-acquainted with it
No problem ... I've been rather busy on other stuff too :).
On 05/01/2012 04:32 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
...
I have a wishlist for that m
+1000 We wouldn't have made it without Andrew!
On 05/09/12 11:46, Rob Weir wrote:
As we celebrate the release of Apache OpenOffice 3.4, I want to just
take moment to recognize one project member who has been very busy,
but also very quiet.
The transition from Oracle to Apache did not end with O
Hi again;
There are other, more interesting, matters that I want to work on
so I moved this to BZ 119319.
I may come back to it later but perhaps having more eyes looking
for the issue helps ;).
Best regards,
Pedro.
On 05/07/12 22:11, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hello;
I have a patch to update
Hello ...
--- Lun 7/5/12, Fernando Cassia ha scritto:
>
>
> > We'll need an ooo-site publishing blackout until the
> release is announced.
>
>
> When is the release expected to happen?.
>
Shortly after the blackout ;).
Pedro.
Hello;
I have a patch to update Apache Commons to the latest versions that
don't break the API. I also included a patch for some openjdk issue in
httpclient.
Unfortunately the build system is playing some tricks on me and
it breaks like this:
_
...
Buildfile:
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-3
--- Sab 5/5/12, RGB ES ha scritto:
...
> AOO installs several fonts but not
> system wide, it install those fonts
> on /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.4/share/fonts/truetype/
>
> Some of those font (DejaVu family, Gentium Basic) are
> already installed on my system so the question is:
> which fonts u
Hello;
--- Ven 4/5/12, Raphael Bircher ha scritto:
> Hi Ji Yan
>
> You can upload the VM samewhere? so asfinfra people can have
> a look on it. But you have to install the same at the ASF
> Infrastructure again, because infra setup only clean VM's.
> Join the IRC-Channel #asfinfra and
> subscri
On 05/02/12 00:46, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
The vote period for releasing Apache OpenOffice (incubator) RC1 has
concluded.
The ballot passed.
VOTE TALLY
+1:
IPMC members:
+1 Marvin Humphrey
+1 Dave Fisher
+1 Jim Jagielski
For reference see also the vote thread on ooo-dev
http://mail-archive
On 05/01/12 23:58, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
I think you are just trying to find some silly excuse to complain
about code that *you* clearly didn't write or own. All the code
either from version control or bugzilla was provided by O
On 05/01/12 21:42, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
On 05/01/12 12:20, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
...
For larger contributions, an ICLA (or an SGA) is in order. Ditto for
smaller ones, if there are questions/concerns. Remember, any
committer can
On 05/01/12 12:07, Michael Meeks wrote:
...
or something - though, clearly there are prolly some interesting new
files there too - which would fall foul of the list in the SGA I guess.
Anyhow - most interested in the status of those.
Of course we don't "release" CWSs at all, those
Michael, Michael ...
On 05/01/12 11:38, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi Rob,
So what exactly LO has is "license soup" as far as I am concerned.
The situation is reasonably simple currently; yet it is of course made
un-necessarily difficult by IBM& Oracle's insistence on choosing yet
ano
On 05/01/12 12:20, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
...
For larger contributions, an ICLA (or an SGA) is in order. Ditto for
smaller ones, if there are questions/concerns. Remember, any
committer can veto a patch. So incoming patches without an ICLA need
to meet a high bar to get into the code. My de
Benvenuto Giuseppe!
On 05/01/12 06:25, Giuseppe Castagno wrote:
Hi there,
a few words to introduce myself.
My name is Giuseppe Castagno, I live in very small town near Turin,
Italy.
I'm 56 years old and I work as a free-lance programmer.
I participated in OpenOffice.org, there I was known a
Hello;
Checking the licenses in the website:
http://www.openoffice.org/licenses/
I will be getting rid of the GPL and LGPL. I will leave some
old stuff (OCA, SCA, PDL) just for reference.
~/Documents/ooo-licenses% svn status
D gpl_license.html
D lgpl_license.html
D newlicense20
On 04/29/12 23:55, Juergen Schmidt wrote:
...
I think it all depends on how fast we plan to release 4.0.
It looks likely that merging Symophony may be easy for the
IBM guys, since symphony already updated theit base OOo,
so a release may be fast and the 3.x branch may be short
lived. (I don't k
Hi Claudio;
First of all the mandatory disclaimer that I am not a
lawyer either :-).
...
--- Dom 29/4/12, Claudio Filho ha scritto:
...
> Hi
>
> I am not a lawer but i did a work of licenses some time
> ago[1], and i read many of main licenses, and a thing
> that i listened in all was that on
--- Sab 28/4/12, Rob Weir ha scritto:
...
> >
> > All in all, I think we should focus on stability and
> > not on features.
> >
>
What I am meaning here is that our users should not expect
false promises like adding an "import Visio documents
feature" that simply doesn't work. Of course feat
--- Sab 28/4/12, Dave Fisher ha scritto:
...
> >
> > We also have to update some components. Anything with
> > an Apache tag on it, like Apache Commons or Apache Lucene
> > comes first because working with other Apache projects
> > is key for our graduation.
>
> The amount of "Apache" product
Hello;
On 04/28/12 11:32, Rob Weir wrote:
I'm already starting to get questions on what we'll be doing after AOO
3.4 is released. Based on previous conversations on this list, I'm
able to speak confidently about a few things:
1) We'll probably graduate to a Top Level Project
2) IBM says they
+1 (PPMC)
I think in it's current state the code has the level
required to be considered the qualified successor of
OpenOffice.org.
Considering the size of the task I want to congratulate
our developers and the Apache infra team for working so
hard to make this wonderful release in such a short t
Hi Yakov;
--- Sab 21/4/12, Yakov Reztsov ha scritto:
...
> I review Apache OpenOffice 3.4
> (incubating) release candidate 1 (RC1) is based on the svn
> revision 1327774 (Windows version)
>
> Python operator license() type Apache license in this
> version.
>
I am not sure I understand but
Hi Dave;
--- Ven 20/4/12, Dave Fisher ha scritto:
...
>
> On Apr 20, 2012, at 10:14 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
> > Pedro Giffuni wrote on Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 07:41:19
> -0700:
...
> >>
> >> We are specifically warning people that the older
> >>
Hello;
--- Ven 20/4/12, Daniel Shahaf ha scritto:
...
> OOo PPMC:
>
> Several mirror operators have asked whether they are
> expected to carry
> both their preexisting/legacy OOo mirrors and the AOOo
> mirror.
>
> We're assuming the legacy OOo mirrors can be dropped once an
> AOOo
> release is
--- Lun 16/4/12, Jürgen Schmidt ha scritto:
...
>
> I am uncertain about the changes relating the icon sets. I
> would prefer if we revert the last changes because I don't
> see them as critical, at least when they cause a build
> breaker.
>
I am running the code of course, and the icons can be
--- Lun 16/4/12, Andrew Rist ha scritto:
...
> >
> > Can someone with access to the Buildbot have a look?
>
> The exception with the upload is fixed (the multiple
> versioning of the exe files also)
> There is still an issue with the build - both win and
> linux64 are running into issues.
> win
On 04/16/12 05:06, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Hi Pedro,
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 12:18:13AM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
IMHO we shouldn't remove anything, on the contrary we should revert all
changes: the list of icon styles is filled in the constructor of
OfaViewTabPage. Ultimately
Hello;
On 04/16/12 00:38, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
...
But the previous Buildbot also did not succeed.
There occurs en exception on the "upload" step
Thus, from my opinion it is still needed to have a look at the Buildbot.
Best regards, Oliver.
Well, the FreeBSD buildbot did detec
Hi;
It was likely a missing commit that is solved by
Revision 1326484.
Sorry,
Pedro.
--- Lun 16/4/12, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann ha scritto:
> Da: Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
> Oggetto: Re: buildbot exception in ASF Buildbot on aoo-win7
> A: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Data: Lunedì 16 Aprile 2012
On 04/15/12 23:08, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Hi Pedro,
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 09:47:30PM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
On 04/15/12 21:06, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
...
I committed the fix (I had a blackout between the commit and the moment
I did the followup on BZ). Hope you don't
On 04/15/12 21:06, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
...
I committed the fix (I had a blackout between the commit and the moment
I did the followup on BZ). Hope you don't mind
As far as you built and tested the fix before committing it, I don't
mind :)
Actually .. the fix that I committed (removin
On 04/15/12 13:33, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Hi Andrea,
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:59:29AM +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
While trying to verify if an old problem (i.e., Crystal still listed
in the icon sets, see http://s.apache.org/eI ) was still around -
and honestly I expected it was, beca
--- Gio 12/4/12, drew ha scritto:
...
> >
> > Because we just have no basis for rejecting mirrors.
>
> Sure we do, groups; particularly non-profits turn down
> offers from commercial operators all the time. Lets be
> clear the SF offer is not all about contributing to
> the project it is also t
Hi Drew;
--- Gio 12/4/12, drew ha scritto:
> On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 21:09 -0500,
> Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> > Peter;
> >
> > it's really amazing to see level of support and general
> > service that mirrorbrain has provided historically for
> > OpenOffice.
Peter;
it's really amazing to see level of support and general service that
mirrorbrain has provided historically for OpenOffice. We haven't
said no to mirrorbrain but you do understand that we just couldn't
turn down the extra support offered by sourceforge. Everyone that
offers to help is alway
Just wondering how the eelease process will be ...
Will people have to vote twice ... one for the RC and
again for the Release? Or is there a RC and then the
vote so that it becomes the Release?
I don't care about the RC so what will define when we
really have a Release?
cheers,
Pedro.
--- Gi
ity.c :
#include "system.h"
#include
cheers,
Pedro.
On 02.04.2012, at 17:32, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hmm... this sounds wrong:for Solaris you should be including
sal/osl/unx/system.hnot the OS2 header.
Pedro.
--- Lun 2/4/12, Jean-Louis 'Hans' Fuchs
ha scritto:
201 - 300 of 971 matches
Mail list logo
