Hi Rob,
On Nov 10, 2011, at 10:46 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
>
>> I think that the following process should be considered.
>>
>
> A few questions, to make sure I understand.
>
>> (1) Migrate each N-L site fully into the Apache SVN. They are a
Hi,
On 10 November 2011 13:46, Rob Weir wrote:
> It is not clear to me whether the diversity in N-L pages was by design
> or simply from lack of coordination.
Intentional. My purpose in permitting the project leads in N-L (and
for that matter, all the other projects) was based on two principals
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> I think that the following process should be considered.
>
A few questions, to make sure I understand.
> (1) Migrate each N-L site fully into the Apache SVN. They are all preserved.
>
In other words, copy the existing static HTML from the
On Nov 10, 2011, at 10:13 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> On Nov 10, 2011, at 9:06 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>> As many of you may know, per Dave's announcement about a week or so ago, we
>>> have a staging site of *MOST* (we're still finding ar
On Nov 10, 2011, at 9:06 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> As many of you may know, per Dave's announcement about a week or so ago, we
>> have a staging site of *MOST* (we're still finding areas that need to be
>> "re-pulled" for one reason or another), o
