Hi Rob
Am 30.08.11 20:52, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Raphael Bircher wrote:
Hi Rob
So you want to split the community into a official apache and a inofficial
extendet community? That will happend if you will fellow strictly the apache
way. Then we will have the Develop
is always the ability to submit a
>> proposal to the PPMC. They could also make their own incubation
>> proposal to Apache. Since Apache, not this project, owns the
>> trademark, logo and domain name, Apache could then mediate access to
>> these assets among the Apache projects that request them. That i
with material that is
not so pure.
Another way to look at it is a web-site/-service version of an Apache Extra,
visible to the world on a non-Apache domain name.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2011 14:33
To: ooo-dev@incu
.org URI.
Am I getting warmer?
Quite.
Regards,
Dave
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Terry Ellison [mailto:te...@ellisons.org.uk]
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2011 18:13
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Dennis E. Hamilton
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] RE: SVN and bringing the total end-to-en
nis
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Terry Ellison [mailto:te...@ellisons.org.uk]
> Sent: Monday, August 29, 2011 18:13
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Dennis E. Hamilton
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] RE: SVN and bringing the total end-to-end OOo proj
1 18:13
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Dennis E. Hamilton
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] RE: SVN and bringing the total end-to-end OOo project
under Configuration Management
Dennis,
I just want to emphasise one of the key points that I made in my
original post and which seems to have got lost in
Dennis,
I just want to emphasise one of the key points that I made in my
original post and which seems to have got lost in the subsequent
dialogue. I differentiated between the "application" -- that is the S/W
configuration based on the customisation of a FLOSS package -- which
supports a se
Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Andy Brown wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
Much clipped to save space.
Look at http://www.oooforum.org They get tons of traffic though they
are independent of the OOo and get no advantage from the URL or any
official relationship to the project.
I
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Andy Brown wrote:
> Rob Weir wrote:
>
>
> Much clipped to save space.
>>
>> Look at http://www.oooforum.org They get tons of traffic though they
>> are independent of the OOo and get no advantage from the URL or any
>> official relationship to the project.
>>
>
>
gust 29, 2011 16:55
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] RE: SVN and bringing the total end-to-end OOo project
under Configuration Management
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
> Rob, I completely disagree with embracing everything under ALv2 and exclusive
&g
Rob Weir wrote:
Much clipped to save space.
Look at http://www.oooforum.org They get tons of traffic though they
are independent of the OOo and get no advantage from the URL or any
official relationship to the project.
If you look on the support page at OOo you will find the oooforum liste
project SVN with material that is
> not so pure.
>
> Another way to look at it is a web-site/-service version of an Apache Extra,
> visible to the world on a non-Apache domain name.
>
> - Dennis
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Rob Weir [mai
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2011 14:33
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] RE: SVN and bringing the total end-to-end OOo project
under Configuration Management
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
> I've been mulling this over and I am wondering ab
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
> I've been mulling this over and I am wondering about another way to look at
> the problem, building on Eike's suggestion too.
>
> This is not a proposal. It is too high-level and not concrete enough with a
> viable roadmap. We need t
I've been mulling this over and I am wondering about another way to look at the
problem, building on Eike's suggestion too.
This is not a proposal. It is too high-level and not concrete enough with a
viable roadmap. We need to see if we can find a consensus in principle and
then see what kind
15 matches
Mail list logo
