On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net
wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On May 31, 2012, at 7:57 PM, Rob Weir
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On May 31, 2012, at 7:57 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Marcus (OOo)
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On May 31, 2012, at 7:57 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de
wrote:
Hi license experts, all,
I'm just wondering if
Hi license experts, all,
I'm just wondering if it's necessary to label our webpages with the ALv2
header.
At least for our JavaScript files I could think of that it is suitable
as it is kind of code? Or also for CSS files? All webpage files?
Would be great to get opinions from our license
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Hi license experts, all,
I'm just wondering if it's necessary to label our webpages with the ALv2
header.
If you look at our project webpages (those at
incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg) you see that they do all have
Sent from my iPhone
On May 31, 2012, at 7:57 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Hi license experts, all,
I'm just wondering if it's necessary to label our webpages with the ALv2
header.
If you look at our
