On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Of course, the easy decision is simply to say yes to everything.
But unless the ASF gets free registrations, this is a cost that will
need to be
On 2012-05-26 9:23 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Fernando Cassiafcas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org wrote:
Of course, the easy decision is simply to say yes to everything.
But unless the ASF gets free registrations,
On 2012-05-25 9:37 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
On 2012-05-25, at 20:34 , Albino Biasutti Neto wrote:
Hi.
2012/5/25 Louis Suárez-Pottslui...@gmail.com
On 2012-05-23, at 12:21 , Andrew Rist wrote:
As part of the transfer of the web properties of OOo to the ASF, the set
of related
On 2012-05-26, at 11:10 , Shane Curcuru wrote:
Sun allowed them to operate.
It wasn't Sun. Sun and Oracle, for that matter, didn't even really turn a blind
eye. For most of its history with OOo/SO, Sun couldn't care less and when it
did notice bad actors (defrauders, scammers, etc.) it acted
: [WWW] What to do with OOo related domains?
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Of course, the easy decision is simply to say yes to everything.
But unless the ASF gets free registrations, this is a cost that will
need to be handled on an ongoing basis.
Suppose
On 23/05/2012 Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 05/23/2012 08:03 PM, schrieb Dave Fisher:
On May 23, 2012, at 10:56 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Andrew Rist wrote:
* Ignore and let the domains expire
* Continue to register to block squatting, but do no more
* Continue to
On 2012-05-23, at 12:21 , Andrew Rist wrote:
As part of the transfer of the web properties of OOo to the ASF, the set of
related domains has also been offered to ASF.
We (PPMC) need to decide what we want to do with the related domains. There
are three obvious options available to us:
Hi.
2012/5/25 Louis Suárez-Potts lui...@gmail.com
On 2012-05-23, at 12:21 , Andrew Rist wrote:
As part of the transfer of the web properties of OOo to the ASF, the set
of related domains has also been offered to ASF.
We (PPMC) need to decide what we want to do with the related domains.
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Andrew Rist andrew.r...@oracle.com wrote:
As part of the transfer of the web properties of OOo to the ASF, the set of
related domains has also been offered to ASF.
We (PPMC) need to decide what we want to do with the related domains. There
are three obvious
On 2012-05-25, at 20:34 , Albino Biasutti Neto wrote:
Hi.
2012/5/25 Louis Suárez-Potts lui...@gmail.com
On 2012-05-23, at 12:21 , Andrew Rist wrote:
As part of the transfer of the web properties of OOo to the ASF, the set
of related domains has also been offered to ASF.
We (PPMC)
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Of course, the easy decision is simply to say yes to everything.
But unless the ASF gets free registrations, this is a cost that will
need to be handled on an ongoing basis.
Suppose we're speaking about 10 domains, I don't
As part of the transfer of the web properties of OOo to the ASF, the set
of related domains has also been offered to ASF.
We (PPMC) need to decide what we want to do with the related domains.
There are three obvious options available to us:
* Ignore and let the domains expire
* Continue to
On 05/23/12 11:21, Andrew Rist wrote:
As part of the transfer of the web properties of OOo to the ASF, the
set of related domains has also been offered to ASF.
We (PPMC) need to decide what we want to do with the related domains.
There are three obvious options available to us:
* Ignore and
It depends on what the PPMC thinks, and also how popular the links to
those existing domains are. IF any of them still have much attention
publicly, then it's probably worth keeping them for the time being,
pointing to an appropriate place on oo.o.
- Shane, who had one of his previous unused
On 05/23/2012 10:46 AM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
It depends on what the PPMC thinks, and also how popular the links to
those existing domains are. IF any of them still have much attention
publicly, then it's probably worth keeping them for the time being,
pointing to an appropriate place on oo.o.
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Andrew Rist andrew.r...@oracle.com wrote:
* Ignore and let the domains expire
* Continue to register to block squatting, but do no more
* Continue to register and forward to oo.o
I think the third option is the best. All those domains serve a purpose, to
On May 23, 2012, at 10:56 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Andrew Rist andrew.r...@oracle.com wrote:
* Ignore and let the domains expire
* Continue to register to block squatting, but do no more
* Continue to register and forward to oo.o
I think the third
Am 05/23/2012 08:03 PM, schrieb Dave Fisher:
On May 23, 2012, at 10:56 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Andrew Ristandrew.r...@oracle.com wrote:
* Ignore and let the domains expire
* Continue to register to block squatting, but do no more
* Continue to register
18 matches
Mail list logo
