Hi;
I thought it would be a good time to bring this subject
up again.
--- On Sat, 9/10/11, Mathias Bauer wrote:
...
and i completely forgot to mention that i've got a
linear MQ patch
series applying against OOO340 that contains the
following:
...
ause131
ause130
writerfilter10
Am 18.09.2011 01:04, schrieb Michael Stahl:
- mba34issues01: somebody said that he would do this one;
Mathias, how long do we have to wait... :)
Done.
Regards,
Mathias
On 10.09.2011 20:31, Eike Rathke wrote:
On Saturday, 2011-09-10 20:19:54 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
and i completely forgot to mention that i've got a linear MQ patch
series applying against OOO340 that contains the following:
ooo340fixes
mingwport35
ause131
ause130
writerfilter10
Am 18.09.11 01:04, schrieb Michael Stahl:
On 10.09.2011 20:31, Eike Rathke wrote:
On Saturday, 2011-09-10 20:19:54 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
and i completely forgot to mention that i've got a linear MQ patch
series applying against OOO340 that contains the following:
ooo340fixes
mingwport35
Moin Eike,
Am 09.09.2011 16:11, schrieb Eike Rathke:
Hi,
calc67 DEV300m106
Doing that.
Eike
Before you waste your time with it: I will take care for mba34issues01.
Regards,
Mathias
Hi,
On Friday, 2011-09-09 15:40:06 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
2. Lookup 12fa3ee3d107 in calc68 with
$ hg log | less
* Verify that no OOO340 masterfix is above that revision, if there
are lookup the topmost masterfix.
* Next changeset on top in calc68 is af32685ae575
There is one
Hi,
On Saturday, 2011-09-10 17:46:10 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
There is one problem with this approach if the CWS was rebased to
a milestone and already had changes, they are lumped together in one
merge changeset,
Bah, forget what I wrote in that mail, the problem is worse, that
changeset
Hi,
On Saturday, 2011-09-10 17:46:10 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
2. Lookup 12fa3ee3d107 in calc68 with
$ hg log | less
* Verify that no OOO340 masterfix is above that revision, if there
are lookup the topmost masterfix.
* Next changeset on top in calc68 is af32685ae575
Hi Michael,
On Saturday, 2011-09-10 20:19:54 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
2. Lookup 12fa3ee3d107 in calc68 with
$ hg log | less
* Verify that no OOO340 masterfix is above that revision, if there
are lookup the topmost masterfix.
* Next changeset on top in calc68 is
Am 10.09.2011 21:00, schrieb Pedro F. Giffuni:
Hi,
Excuse the newcomer ignorance ...
--- On Sat, 9/10/11, Michael Stahl wrote:
...
and i completely forgot to mention that i've got a linear
MQ patch series applying against OOO340 that contains the
following:
ooo340fixes
Hi,
On Saturday, 2011-09-10 21:00:40 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
Master DEV300, Release 3.4, Status nominated:
jl167 DEV300m104
I don't know what happened on that CWS, apparently nothing. Whyever it
was nominated..
Eike
--
PGP/OpenPGP/GnuPG encrypted mail preferred in all private
Hi Mathias,
On Saturday, 2011-09-10 21:57:05 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote:
and i completely forgot to mention that i've got a linear MQ patch
series applying against OOO340 that contains the following:
ooo340fixes
mingwport35
ause131
ause130
writerfilter10
gnumake4
Hi,
On Saturday, 2011-09-10 21:00:40 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
Master DEV300, Release 3.4, Status nominated:
impress212 DEV300m104
I stumbled over a few things in that CWS that needed extra care:
It touched files under svtools/source/filter.vcl/filter/
That directory was renamed to
Hi,
On Wednesday, 2011-09-07 15:43:13 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
I'll first grab calc68 and try my luck ;)
Did so with a git svn repository, see another thread
Message-ID: j3frmh$6of$1...@dough.gmane.org
Hi,
On Friday, 2011-09-09 15:40:06 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
Did so with a git svn repository, see another thread
Message-ID: j3frmh$6of$1...@dough.gmane.org
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ooo-dev/201108.mbox/%3Cj3frmh$6of$1...@dough.gmane.org%3E
Note that for the stg
Hi Mathias,
On Wednesday, 2011-09-07 00:28:29 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote:
| So, we can choose:
|
| x) first identify and remove license incompatible code to be pointed to
|clashes when the CWSs will be integrated, additionally lookout for
|new license incompatible code when
Am 09/07/2011 03:43 PM, schrieb Eike Rathke:
On Wednesday, 2011-09-07 00:28:29 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote:
| So, we can choose:
|
| x) first identify and remove license incompatible code to be pointed to
|clashes when the CWSs will be integrated, additionally lookout for
|new license
Am 07.09.2011 18:47, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
Am 09/07/2011 03:43 PM, schrieb Eike Rathke:
On Wednesday, 2011-09-07 00:28:29 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote:
| So, we can choose:
|
| x) first identify and remove license incompatible code to be pointed to
|clashes when the CWSs will be
Hi,
And now for something completely different: CODE
As lined out in
Message-ID: 20110831191817.gf29...@kulungile.erack.de
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ooo-dev/201108.mbox/%3c20110831191817.gf29...@kulungile.erack.de%3E
there are 2 possible approaches to integrate pending
: Eike Rathke o...@erack.de
Subject: [code][repo] Integration of CWSs
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Date: Tuesday, September 6, 2011, 11:50 AM
Hi,
And now for something completely different: CODE
As lined out in
Message-ID: 20110831191817.gf29...@kulungile.erack.de
http://mail
: [code][repo] Integration of CWSs
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Date: Tuesday, September 6, 2011, 11:50 AM
Hi,
And now for something completely different: CODE
As lined out in
Message-ID: 20110831191817.gf29...@kulungile.erack.de
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ooo-dev
Hi Eike,
Am 06.09.2011 18:50, schrieb Eike Rathke:
| So, we can choose:
|
| x) first identify and remove license incompatible code to be pointed to
|clashes when the CWSs will be integrated, additionally lookout for
|new license incompatible code when integrating CWSs thereafter,
22 matches
Mail list logo
