- Original Message
From: Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de
Am 07/14/2011 09:59 PM, schrieb Dave Fisher:
(1) Get the existing svn website repository into the project's svn. I
think
we should just export it all and then add to the project. The move from cvs
to
svn in kenai has
--- On Mon, 7/18/11, BRM bm_witn...@yahoo.com wrote:
...
So, when we import the Kenai SVN into the Apache
SVN then commit history
is not important as we will loose data from
February until today.
At least, that's my opinion.
FWIW - there is a project cvs2svn that can
--- On Mon, 7/18/11, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
...
So, all is not necessarily lost - but it does depend
on whether you want to reload the SVN repo.
I don't know how you thought about CVS but the respective
repo is already on SVN.
I am confused. Apparently (I am a
- Original Message
From: Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de
Am 07/18/2011 04:31 PM, schrieb BRM:
- Original Message
From: Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de
Am 07/14/2011 09:59 PM, schrieb Dave Fisher:
(1) Get the existing svn website repository into the project's
- Original Message
From: Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Mon, July 18, 2011 12:59:07 PM
Subject: Re: Apache CMS Workflow and a Key Question
Am 07/18/2011 06:31 PM, schrieb Pedro F. Giffuni:
--- On Mon, 7/18/11, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m
On 07/13/2011 10:17 PM, Arthur Buijs wrote:
On 07/14/2011 01:25 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On 07/08/2011 01:39 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
(5) When the contributor has updated content ready then they can
proceed by according to (a) Non-committer - submit an svn diff as a
patch. (b) Committer -
On 07/14/2011 12:59 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
I'm top posting - sorry about that. Let's summarized some facts.
- The Apache Way requires a certain process. Commit then Review OR
Review the Commit. This is essential project governance.
- The approach I outlined is admittedly like what a code
On Jul 14, 2011, at 2:32 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On 07/14/2011 12:59 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
I'm top posting - sorry about that. Let's summarized some facts.
- The Apache Way requires a certain process. Commit then Review OR
Review the Commit. This is essential project governance.
-
On Jul 14, 2011, at 3:09 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 07/14/2011 09:59 PM, schrieb Dave Fisher:
I'm top posting - sorry about that. Let's summarized some facts.
- The Apache Way requires a certain process. Commit then Review OR Review
the Commit. This is essential project governance.
-
Kay's questions on
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/OOo-to-ASF-site-recommendation
have helped me focus on how to enable website contributions.
I really like the Apache CMS. Here is possible a workflow that would allow
non-committers to be able to contribute patches to both
On Jul 8, 2011, at 1:39 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
Kay's questions on
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/OOo-to-ASF-site-recommendation
have helped me focus on how to enable website contributions.
I really like the Apache CMS. Here is possible a workflow that would allow
11 matches
Mail list logo
