On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 12:17 AM, imacat ima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw wrote:
On 2011/07/19 03:08, Rob Weir said:
+1 Let's start from a stable build and make changes from there that
leave the build stable. So I think it looks like this:
1) Get all OOo Hg repository converted over to SVN. This
On 2011/07/19 19:02, Rob Weir said:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 12:17 AM, imacat ima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw wrote:
On 2011/07/19 03:08, Rob Weir said:
Possibly. But I don't see anything from Symphony is a must have for
AOOo 3.4. I think it is more important that we complete 3.4 with the
feature
Dear all,
I welcome the contribution from the Symphony team. But before the
Symphony contribution, shouldn't it be the first task to move the source
onto Apache SVN or something, instead of the current mercurial hg? Not
only IBM would like to contribute back to OpenOffice.org, but many of
On 18.07.2011 18:32, imacat wrote:
Dear all,
I welcome the contribution from the Symphony team. But before the
Symphony contribution, shouldn't it be the first task to move the source
onto Apache SVN or something, instead of the current mercurial hg? Not
only IBM would like to
Am 07/18/2011 06:32 PM, schrieb imacat:
I welcome the contribution from the Symphony team. But before the
Symphony contribution, shouldn't it be the first task to move the source
onto Apache SVN or something, instead of the current mercurial hg? Not
only IBM would like to contribute back
Yes, that is the right sequence. Our project is Apache OpenOffice, no
question there. The intent behind the future code contribution of Symphony
is to make it possible to harvest some of the value from it, and to merge
that value into Apache OpenOffice. PPMC members affiliated with IBM, will be
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Donald Harbison dpharbi...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, that is the right sequence. Our project is Apache OpenOffice, no
question there. The intent behind the future code contribution of Symphony
is to make it possible to harvest some of the value from it, and to merge
imacat wrote:
Dear all,
I welcome the contribution from the Symphony team. But before the
Symphony contribution, shouldn't it be the first task to move the source
onto Apache SVN or something, instead of the current mercurial hg? Not
only IBM would like to contribute back to
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Andy Brown a...@the-martin-byrd.net wrote:
Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Donald Harbison dpharbi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Yes, that is the right sequence. Our project is Apache OpenOffice, no
question there. The intent behind the future
