Re: Defect Status wiki

2012-08-27 Thread Shenfeng Liu
Andrea, Thanks for your explanation! I think we can just follow the original process if the development is on a feature branch, and close the defect only when the fix is available on main trunk or a release. While if the fix is delivered directly to trunk or a release branch, we can take the

Re: Defect Status wiki

2012-08-24 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 22/08/2012 Shenfeng Liu wrote: (2) I'm not sure what's the difference between the status *Verified* and *Closed*. IMO all the defects verified should finally be closed. In the old OpenOffice.org project, where the QA process was probably more formal, the meaning were the following: -

Defect Status wiki

2012-08-22 Thread Shenfeng Liu
Thanks for Rob's defect chart! While, I think there are more defect status worthy to trace to give people the overall picture of AOO quality status. So I created a AOO Defect Status Reporthttps://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+Defect+Status+Reportwiki to list what in my mind. I