Re: Extensions and Templates [was: Re: Draft IP Review Plan for OpenOffice]

2011-12-01 Thread FR web forum
http://extensions.services.openoffice.org is down again (5:30 UTC). http://templates.services.openoffice.org are hosted by the Oregon State Both websites seem to be restarted. Just few problem to loading page with error returns. I don't know who thank but end users are grateful for that

Re: Draft IP Review Plan for OpenOffice

2011-11-18 Thread Gianluca Turconi
In data 17 novembre 2011 alle ore 22:26:18, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org ha scritto: I'm OK with that. This is what I was thinking of as #3 below. So saying, You do not have a dictionary installed, would you like to see a list of 3rd party dictionaries? is fine. You then can launch a

Re: Draft IP Review Plan for OpenOffice

2011-11-18 Thread Andre Fischer
. TJ, do you see any other flavors, or have any other specific cases in mind. -Original Message- From: TJ Frazier [mailto:tjfraz...@cfl.rr.com] Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 11:44 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Draft IP Review Plan for OpenOffice On 11/17/2011 14:16, Rob

Re: Draft IP Review Plan for OpenOffice

2011-11-18 Thread eric b
Hi Andre, Le 18 nov. 11 à 09:42, Andre Fischer a écrit : On 17.11.2011 21:30, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: There are some odd cases of abandonware having no authoritative location for downloading and also having OpenOffice.org-applied patches. I think dmake is one of those. I have no idea

Re: Draft IP Review Plan for OpenOffice

2011-11-18 Thread Andre Fischer
Hi Eric, On 18.11.2011 10:00, eric b wrote: Hi Andre, Le 18 nov. 11 à 09:42, Andre Fischer a écrit : On 17.11.2011 21:30, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: There are some odd cases of abandonware having no authoritative location for downloading and also having OpenOffice.org-applied patches. I

Extensions and Templates [was: Re: Draft IP Review Plan for OpenOffice]

2011-11-18 Thread Dave Fisher
On Nov 17, 2011, at 9:53 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:40:25AM -0800, Dave Fisher wrote: If this statement is rewritten for Binary releases to allow informed installation of a Language Pack whatever it's host, license and copyright might be - as long as on

Re: Extensions and Templates [was: Re: Draft IP Review Plan for OpenOffice]

2011-11-18 Thread Rob Weir
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote: On Nov 17, 2011, at 9:53 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:40:25AM -0800, Dave Fisher wrote: If this statement is rewritten for Binary releases to allow informed installation of a Language

Re: Extensions and Templates [was: Re: Draft IP Review Plan for OpenOffice]

2011-11-18 Thread Reizinger Zoltán
2011.11.18. 17:19 keltezéssel, Rob Weir írta: On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Dave Fisherdave2w...@comcast.net wrote: On Nov 17, 2011, at 9:53 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:40:25AM -0800, Dave Fisher wrote: If this statement is rewritten for Binary releases

Re: Extensions and Templates [was: Re: Draft IP Review Plan for OpenOffice]

2011-11-18 Thread Rob Weir
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote: On Nov 18, 2011, at 8:19 AM, Rob Weir wrote: On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote: On Nov 17, 2011, at 9:53 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:40:25AM

Re: Extensions and Templates [was: Re: Draft IP Review Plan for OpenOffice]

2011-11-18 Thread Rob Weir
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Reizinger Zoltán zreizin...@hdsnet.hu wrote: 2011.11.18. 17:19 keltezéssel, Rob Weir írta: On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Dave Fisherdave2w...@comcast.net  wrote: On Nov 17, 2011, at 9:53 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at

Draft IP Review Plan for OpenOffice

2011-11-17 Thread Rob Weir
I've consolidated and summarized the various bits of guidance we've received on this list and on legal-discuss, and distill in down into relevant guidance for this project. We don't need to all be experts in this, but I think everyone contributing code needs to understand the basics of what we

Re: Draft IP Review Plan for OpenOffice

2011-11-17 Thread Dave Fisher
On Nov 17, 2011, at 11:16 AM, Rob Weir wrote: I've consolidated and summarized the various bits of guidance we've received on this list and on legal-discuss, and distill in down into relevant guidance for this project. We don't need to all be experts in this, but I think everyone

Re: Draft IP Review Plan for OpenOffice

2011-11-17 Thread TJ Frazier
On 11/17/2011 14:16, Rob Weir wrote: I've consolidated and summarized the various bits of guidance we've received on this list and on legal-discuss, and distill in down into relevant guidance for this project. We don't need to all be experts in this, but I think everyone contributing code needs

Re: Draft IP Review Plan for OpenOffice

2011-11-17 Thread Rob Weir
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote: On Nov 17, 2011, at 11:16 AM, Rob Weir wrote: I've consolidated and summarized the various bits of guidance we've received on this list and on legal-discuss, and distill in down into relevant guidance for this project.

Re: Draft IP Review Plan for OpenOffice

2011-11-17 Thread Rob Weir
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:43 PM, TJ Frazier tjfraz...@cfl.rr.com wrote: On 11/17/2011 14:16, Rob Weir wrote: I've consolidated and summarized the various bits of guidance we've received on this list and on legal-discuss, and distill in down into relevant guidance for this project.  We don't

RE: Draft IP Review Plan for OpenOffice

2011-11-17 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
: TJ Frazier [mailto:tjfraz...@cfl.rr.com] Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 11:44 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Draft IP Review Plan for OpenOffice On 11/17/2011 14:16, Rob Weir wrote: [ ... ] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/IP+Plan+for+Apache+OpenOffice

RE: Draft IP Review Plan for OpenOffice

2011-11-17 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
[mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 11:40 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Draft IP Review Plan for OpenOffice On Nov 17, 2011, at 11:16 AM, Rob Weir wrote: [ ... ] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/IP+Plan+for+Apache+OpenOffice Thanks

RE: Draft IP Review Plan for OpenOffice

2011-11-17 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
+1 on not downloading anything without consent. -Original Message- From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 12:11 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Draft IP Review Plan for OpenOffice On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w

Re: Draft IP Review Plan for OpenOffice

2011-11-17 Thread Rob Weir
-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Draft IP Review Plan for OpenOffice On Nov 17, 2011, at 11:16 AM, Rob Weir wrote: [ ... ] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/IP+Plan+for+Apache+OpenOffice Thanks. This is a good reference. Here's an area where we either already know

Re: Draft IP Review Plan for OpenOffice

2011-11-17 Thread Dave Fisher
: Thursday, November 17, 2011 11:40 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Draft IP Review Plan for OpenOffice On Nov 17, 2011, at 11:16 AM, Rob Weir wrote: [ ... ] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/IP+Plan+for+Apache+OpenOffice Thanks. This is a good reference

Re: Draft IP Review Plan for OpenOffice

2011-11-17 Thread Rob Weir
: Re: Draft IP Review Plan for OpenOffice On Nov 17, 2011, at 11:16 AM, Rob Weir wrote: [ ... ] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/IP+Plan+for+Apache+OpenOffice Thanks. This is a good reference. Here's an area where we either already know the answer or need clarification

Re: Draft IP Review Plan for OpenOffice

2011-11-17 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:40:25AM -0800, Dave Fisher wrote: If this statement is rewritten for Binary releases to allow informed installation of a Language Pack whatever it's host, license and copyright might be - as long as on installation choices were clearly visible and the user explicitly