Re: Fwd: Performance!

2012-05-10 Thread imacat
On 01.05.11 12:22am, Rob Weir said: > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:28 AM, Michael Meeks wrote: >> On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 17:25 +0800, imacat wrote: >>> Please do not attack any party, or create any FUD. > > Well, it looks like ... > -Rob Rob, Could you please stop this, will you? You did not g

Re: Fwd: Performance!

2012-05-10 Thread Tor Lillqvist
> Note that this might not have been found (or fixed), without choice > and competition in the market, provided by Apache OpenOffice.   So > already, AOO 3.4 barely a day old, and we've already helped improve > LibreOffice. Note that the bug Caolán's message is about was reported on 2012-03-21 an

[OT] Blog Engines/comments (was RE: Fwd: Performance!)

2012-05-10 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
12 05:16 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Fwd: Performance! [ ... ] Uninteresting as it is - I've been blogging since 1999 and happen to do it in emacs, in a plain text format; and I host it as flat files: that's a habit I have no interest in breaking for some hideou

Re: Fwd: Performance!

2012-05-10 Thread Michael Meeks
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 07:45 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: > And so you posted questions on his blog, seeking clarifications on > methodology, and he responded. Apparently my general concern around promoting such content as being FUD per-se is hard to answer :-) The only interesting thing to me a