Hi;
--- On Wed, 8/3/11, Mathias Bauer wrote:
...
>
> As Stephan wrote, the structure can be changed easily
> afterwards.
> Building and packaging should follow dependencies (after
> all that was the idea of our new build environment) and
> so the directory structure is of second order importance.
Am 03.08.2011 21:23, schrieb Mathias Bauer:
On 03.08.2011 10:38, IngridvdM wrote:
Am 03.08.2011 10:24, schrieb Stephan Bergmann:
On Aug 3, 2011, at 8:45 AM, IngridvdM wrote:
Ok agreed, binfilter is not the best example.
But what about the general idea to have a second directory where we can p
On 03.08.2011 10:38, IngridvdM wrote:
> Am 03.08.2011 10:24, schrieb Stephan Bergmann:
>> On Aug 3, 2011, at 8:45 AM, IngridvdM wrote:
>>> Ok agreed, binfilter is not the best example.
>>> But what about the general idea to have a second directory where we can
>>> place all the stuff that is not
Am 03.08.2011 10:24, schrieb Stephan Bergmann:
On Aug 3, 2011, at 8:45 AM, IngridvdM wrote:
Ok agreed, binfilter is not the best example.
But what about the general idea to have a second directory where we can place
all the stuff that is not needed to build the main office (so not needed in the
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 8:45 AM, IngridvdM wrote:
> Am 03.08.2011 08:12, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Eike Rathke wrote:
>>
>> Hi IngridvdM,
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, 2011-08-02 20:17:52 +0200, IngridvdM wrote:
>>>
>>> The Hg archive should simply replicate the curren
Am 03.08.2011 08:12, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi IngridvdM,
On Tuesday, 2011-08-02 20:17:52 +0200, IngridvdM wrote:
The Hg archive should simply replicate the current structure at OOo,
also for ease of adding in pending CWSs as branches, so
