Can we add the devtools folder to Ohloh so commits to tools like
netbeansintegration get counted?
Thanks,
Carl
I've been working with the admins at Ohloh to get the OpenOffice
commit history reestablished. It took a couple months, but we finally
have it working and current.
See: https://www.ohloh.net/p/openoffice
Because of the repository change there is some double counting in the
overall code count
Hi Rob;
It does look much better.
--- Ven 6/1/12, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org ha scritto:
...
Finally, any objections if I add a link to this page to our
website,
maybe to an Developer FAQ item on project statistics?
If you do so, please note that this is by no means an
accurate
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Rob;
It does look much better.
--- Ven 6/1/12, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org ha scritto:
...
Finally, any objections if I add a link to this page to our
website,
maybe to an Developer FAQ item on project statistics?
Rob,
On 28 November 2011 16:03, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
FYI. I've contacted an Ohloh admin to see if we can get the stats
updated correctly again.
Is there an update? I'd be curious to know the outcome.
Thanks,
Louis
-Rob
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts
lsuarezpo...@gmail.com wrote:
Rob,
On 28 November 2011 16:03, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
FYI. I've contacted an Ohloh admin to see if we can get the stats
updated correctly again.
Is there an update? I'd be curious to know
FYI. I've contacted an Ohloh admin to see if we can get the stats
updated correctly again.
-Rob
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Andrea Pescetti
pesce...@openoffice.org wrote:
On 11/11/2011 Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Apache OOo is correct (Kudos to arist@) but it is
reported as a duplicate and will be deleted.
When it is deleted actually
On 11/11/2011 Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Apache OOo is correct (Kudos to arist@) but it is
reported as a duplicate and will be deleted.
When it is deleted actually means it is merged, along with its
history, with the OpenOffice project.
OK, and
FWIW,
Ohloh is getting everything wrong now:
OpenOffice.org appears inactive.
Apache OOo is correct (Kudos to arist@) but it is
reported as a duplicate and will be deleted.
The license report shows:
Apache License 2.0 24872 files
GNU LGPL 3 7264 files
BSD Copyright
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
FWIW,
Ohloh is getting everything wrong now:
OpenOffice.org appears inactive.
Apache OOo is correct (Kudos to arist@) but it is
reported as a duplicate and will be deleted.
When it is deleted actually means
On Nov 1, 2011, at 6:05 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
--- On Tue, 11/1/11, Eike Rathke o...@erack.de wrote:
...
hmm, now Ohloh claims that i am the #1 contributor to
OpenOffice.org, how
ridiculous is that...
We're superseded by pfg now ;-)
Heh! I actually finished the bunch
On 11/6/2011 8:30 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Nov 1, 2011, at 6:05 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
--- On Tue, 11/1/11, Eike Rathkeo...@erack.de wrote:
...
hmm, now Ohloh claims that i am the #1 contributor to
OpenOffice.org, how
ridiculous is that...
We're superseded by pfg now ;-)
Heh! I
--- On Tue, 11/1/11, Eike Rathke o...@erack.de wrote:
...
hmm, now Ohloh claims that i am the #1 contributor to
OpenOffice.org, how
ridiculous is that...
We're superseded by pfg now ;-)
Heh! I actually finished the bunch of issues I wanted to
see in AOO 3.4 so I'll give you guys
. I did add the
Apache SVN to it.
And undid it again yesterday or the day before? Maybe that 'osde8info'
fouled things up.. I just undid a change where he undid the hg listing.
Let's see how Ohloh copes with those 2 repositories now.
Note also that the way that project is configured, anyone can
Hi,
Whoever had the brilliant idea to make Ohloh's source code repository
entry for OOo https://www.ohloh.net/p/openoffice point to the AOOo
repository instead trashed over 10 years worth of 1s commits of 100s
developers. Congratulations.
Eike
--
PGP/OpenPGP/GnuPG encrypted mail
Hi;
This is, of course, because we couldn't bring the history
to SVN.
I am not sure how Ohloh works, but I guess the alternative
was to leave it pointing to the previous Hg server that
is abandoned until it dies ... and then attribution
history would still be lost :(.
cheers,
Pedro
On Oct 30, 2011, at 1:43 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
hmm ..
Someone should just create a SUN OpenOffice.org project
at Ohloh and point it to the Hg mirror, that way people
will get the credit they deserve.
Assuming that Kudo level is so important ;).
On the other side when Andrew Rist
Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Someone should just create a SUN OpenOffice.org project
at Ohloh and point it to the Hg mirror, that way people
will get the credit they deserve.
I agree; an openofficeorg-legacy project should be created and
archived if Ohloh is not able to track two repositories
On 30 October 2011 21:40, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@openoffice.org wrote:
Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Someone should just create a SUN OpenOffice.org project
at Ohloh and point it to the Hg mirror, that way people
will get the credit they deserve.
I agree; an openofficeorg-legacy project should
--- On Sun, 10/30/11, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
,,,
On 30 October 2011 21:40, Andrea
Pescetti pesce...@openoffice.org
wrote:
Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Someone should just create a SUN OpenOffice.org
project
at Ohloh and point it to the Hg mirror, that way
people
21 matches
Mail list logo
