On 28.09.2011 00:49, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 27.09.2011 22:22, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
What is the oldest Windows OS version that Apache OOo 3.4(-dev) will
be supported on? How does that compare with the oldest
On 28.09.2011 21:03, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Yes, and as long as there are no real technical problems I don't see a
need to drop the support.
Indeed, and AFAIR dropping the support for any OS versions always was
technically motivated at OOo. Of course technical motivations are
debatable.
Am 29.09.2011 20:17, schrieb Mathias Bauer:
On 28.09.2011 00:49, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 27.09.2011 22:22, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
What is the oldest Windows OS version that Apache OOo 3.4(-dev) will
be supported
Am 09/29/2011 09:16 PM, schrieb Mathias Bauer:
Am 29.09.2011 20:17, schrieb Mathias Bauer:
On 28.09.2011 00:49, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 27.09.2011 22:22, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
What is the oldest Windows OS
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
I'd recommend supporting Windows XP and beyond. XP is officially
supported by Microsoft until April 2014. I'm certainly not making
any effort to maintain or test support for earlier versions. Of
course, that doesn't
-
From: Michael Stahl [mailto:m...@openoffice.org]
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 15:50
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Removal of Windows build requirement on unicows.dll -
issue 88652
On 27.09.2011 22:22, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Dennis E
Message-
From: Michael Stahl [mailto:m...@openoffice.org]
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 15:50
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Removal of Windows build requirement on unicows.dll -
issue 88652
On 27.09.2011 22:22, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 4:08 PM
of QA.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Michael Stahl [mailto:m...@openoffice.org]
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 15:50
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Removal of Windows build requirement on unicows.dll
- issue 88652
On 27.09.2011 22:22, Rob Weir wrote
boundaries are
and might become for purposes of QA.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Michael Stahl [mailto:m...@openoffice.org]
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 15:50
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Removal of Windows build requirement on unicows.dll -
issue
.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Michael Stahl [mailto:m...@openoffice.org]
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 15:50
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Removal of Windows build requirement on unicows.dll -
issue 88652
On 27.09.2011 22:22, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Sep
.)
-Original Message-
From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 15:42
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Removal of Windows build requirement on unicows.dll -
issue 88652
Am 09/28/2011 11:56 PM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
Marcus
Is anyone else building on Windows right now?
If not, we have a logistical problem. Oliver is not a committer, but
he is producing a good number of patches for the Windows build that no
one else seems to be testing and integrating.
I can think of two ways of solving this problem.
-Rob
On Tue,
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Is anyone else building on Windows right now?
If not, we have a logistical problem. Oliver is not a committer, but
he is producing a good number of patches for the Windows build that no
one else seems to be testing and
: Re: [patch] Removal of Windows build requirement on unicows.dll -
issue 88652
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Is anyone else building on Windows right now?
If not, we have a logistical problem. Oliver is not a committer, but
he is producing a good number
...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 08:48
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Removal of Windows build requirement on unicows.dll -
issue 88652
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Is anyone else building on Windows right
]
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 08:48
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Removal of Windows build requirement on unicows.dll -
issue 88652
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org wrote:
Is anyone else building on Windows right now?
If not, we have
] Removal of Windows build requirement on unicows.dll -
issue 88652
On 27.09.2011 22:22, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
What is the oldest Windows OS version that Apache OOo 3.4(-dev) will
be supported on? How does
17 matches
Mail list logo
