On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 9:45 AM, TJ Frazier wrote:
> On 8/13/2011 08:37, Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 6:11 AM, TJ Frazier wrote:
>>>
>>> On 8/12/2011 08:47, Nóirín Plunkett wrote:
2011/8/12 Jürgen Schmidt:
>
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Simon Phipps
>
On 8/13/2011 08:37, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 6:11 AM, TJ Frazier wrote:
On 8/12/2011 08:47, Nóirín Plunkett wrote:
2011/8/12 Jürgen Schmidt:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Simon Phippswrote:
Maybe. But I see no reason why this list needs the protection of being
on a
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 6:11 AM, TJ Frazier wrote:
> On 8/12/2011 08:47, Nóirín Plunkett wrote:
>>
>> 2011/8/12 Jürgen Schmidt:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Simon Phipps wrote:
>>>
Maybe. But I see no reason why this list needs the protection of being
on a
controlled a
Am 08/13/2011 12:33 PM, schrieb Jean Hollis Weber:
On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 12:08 -0400, Shane Curcuru wrote:
This is not a zero sum topic. Personally, I think the most useful
solution would be:
- an open wiki where a folksonomy can grow and have discussion, and lead
to some obvious suggestions
On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 12:08 -0400, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> This is not a zero sum topic. Personally, I think the most useful
> solution would be:
>
> - an open wiki where a folksonomy can grow and have discussion, and lead
> to some obvious suggestions for later inclusion in...
>
> - a public-
On 8/12/2011 08:47, Nóirín Plunkett wrote:
2011/8/12 Jürgen Schmidt:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Simon Phipps wrote:
Maybe. But I see no reason why this list needs the protection of being on a
controlled access page and would suggest doing so is what needs justifying.
I have not seen a
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob Weir [mailto:apa...@robweir.com]
> Sent: Saturday, 13 August 2011 2:46 AM
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Making mailing lists useful (was Re: [Proposal])
>
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Nóirín Plunkett
>
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Nóirín Plunkett wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton
>> wrote:
>>> -1
>>>
>>> Hey, a terrific blow for community there, Rob!
>>>
>>> Please don't ever do that again for a matter under a
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
>
> On 12 Aug 2011, at 16:53, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton
>> wrote:
>>> -1
>>>
>>> Hey, a terrific blow for community there, Rob!
>>>
>>> Please don't ever do that again for a matter under active d
've been voting you've trampled over a lot
of +1's here.
Cut it out.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:apa...@robweir.com]
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 08:53
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Making mailing lists useful (was Re: [Proposal])
On
On 12 Aug 2011, at 16:53, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton
> wrote:
>> -1
>>
>> Hey, a terrific blow for community there, Rob!
>>
>> Please don't ever do that again for a matter under active discussion. Not
>> ever.
>>
>> I urge you to revert those chan
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Nóirín Plunkett wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton
> > wrote:
> >> -1
> >>
> >> Hey, a terrific blow for community there, Rob!
> >>
> >> Please don't ever do that again for a matter
Whoa, let's all take a brief pause and tone down the instant disagreements.
Seriously. This will wait for a day or two.
Plus, heated discussions over who did what where and when are... not
very useful. Rob's made a change which is something of an improvement
by updating the mailing-lists.htm
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton
> wrote:
>> -1
>>
>> Hey, a terrific blow for community there, Rob!
>>
>> Please don't ever do that again for a matter under active discussion. Not
>> ever.
>>
>> I urge you to revert those c
al and a willingness to implement
the alternative.
> - Dennis
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob Weir [mailto:apa...@robweir.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 07:57
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Making mailing lists useful (was Re: [Proposal])
&g
: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Making mailing lists useful (was Re: [Proposal])
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Nóirín Plunkett wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>> The range of contributors to the website is identical to the range of
>>
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Nóirín Plunkett wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>> The range of contributors to the website is identical to the range of
>> contributors to the wiki. The only difference is in the wiki case
>> they need to take the additional step to
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
> The range of contributors to the website is identical to the range of
> contributors to the wiki. The only difference is in the wiki case
> they need to take the additional step to sign up for an account on the
> wiki. In other case they merel
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Nóirín Plunkett wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>> I'm assuming that it is the new list subscriber that benefits most
>> from this. Existing subscribers will just follow the conventions they
>> observe being used on the list. Or do
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
> I'm assuming that it is the new list subscriber that benefits most
> from this. Existing subscribers will just follow the conventions they
> observe being used on the list. Or do you expect to regularly check
> the wiki to see what new subject
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Terry Ellison wrote:
> On 12/08/11 02:41, Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Jean Weber wrote:
>>>
>>> On 12/08/2011, at 10:25, "Dennis E. Hamilton"
>>> wrote:
>>>
+1 on putting materials like the suggested list-post subject categories
>>
On 12/08/11 02:41, Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Jean Weber wrote:
On 12/08/2011, at 10:25, "Dennis E. Hamilton" wrote:
+1 on putting materials like the suggested list-post subject categories on the
community wiki. I see no reason why it needs to be maintained anywhere e
2011/8/12 Jürgen Schmidt :
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Simon Phipps wrote:
>
>> Maybe. But I see no reason why this list needs the protection of being on a
>> controlled access page and would suggest doing so is what needs justifying.
>> I have not seen a reasoned counter to my proposal fo
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Simon Phipps wrote:
> 2011/8/11 Jürgen Schmidt
>
> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Simon Phipps
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On 10 Aug 2011, at 23:12, Rob Weir wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Kay Schenk
> > > wrote:
> > > >> On Mon, Aug 8
So, I'm not the only one that thinks reading this list is a heavy
task. ^^;
On 2011/08/12 10:56, Rob Weir said:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 9:48 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
>>
>> On 12 Aug 2011, at 02:41, Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Jean Weber wrote:
On 12/08/2011,
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 9:48 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
>
> On 12 Aug 2011, at 02:41, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Jean Weber wrote:
>>> On 12/08/2011, at 10:25, "Dennis E. Hamilton"
>>> wrote:
>>>
+1 on putting materials like the suggested list-post subject categorie
On 12 Aug 2011, at 02:41, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Jean Weber wrote:
>> On 12/08/2011, at 10:25, "Dennis E. Hamilton"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 on putting materials like the suggested list-post subject categories on
>>> the community wiki. I see no reason why it needs to
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Jean Weber wrote:
> On 12/08/2011, at 10:25, "Dennis E. Hamilton" wrote:
>
>> +1 on putting materials like the suggested list-post subject categories on
>> the community wiki. I see no reason why it needs to be maintained anywhere
>> else requiring higher cerem
Jean Weber wrote:
On 12/08/2011, at 10:25, "Dennis E. Hamilton" wrote:
+1 on putting materials like the suggested list-post subject categories on the
community wiki. I see no reason why it needs to be maintained anywhere else
requiring higher ceremony.
- Dennis
+1
Jean
+1
Andy
On 12/08/2011, at 10:25, "Dennis E. Hamilton" wrote:
> +1 on putting materials like the suggested list-post subject categories on
> the community wiki. I see no reason why it needs to be maintained anywhere
> else requiring higher ceremony.
>
> - Dennis
>
+1
Jean
, 2011 15:19
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Making mailing lists useful (was Re: [Proposal])
2011/8/11 Jürgen Schmidt
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Simon Phipps wrote:
>
> >
> > On 10 Aug 2011, at 23:12, Rob Weir wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Au
2011/8/11 Jürgen Schmidt
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Simon Phipps wrote:
>
> >
> > On 10 Aug 2011, at 23:12, Rob Weir wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Kay Schenk
> > wrote:
> > >> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Ross Gardler <
> > rgard...@opendirective.com>wrote:
> > >
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Simon Phipps wrote:
>
> On 10 Aug 2011, at 23:12, Rob Weir wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Kay Schenk
> wrote:
> >> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Ross Gardler <
> rgard...@opendirective.com>wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 8 August 2011 16:14, Kay Schenk wr
On 10 Aug 2011, at 23:12, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Ross Gardler
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 8 August 2011 16:14, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
From my perspective, I don't see the one BIG list as bad, but it wou
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Ross Gardler
> wrote:
>
>> On 8 August 2011 16:14, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>
>> > From my perspective, I don't see the one BIG list as bad, but it would be
>> > VERY helpful if folks could label messages mo
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> On 8 August 2011 16:14, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > From my perspective, I don't see the one BIG list as bad, but it would be
> > VERY helpful if folks could label messages more succinctly and restrict
> > discussion to rather specific asp
36 matches
Mail list logo
