On Oct 10, 2011, at 2:24 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
Yes;
I think Rob took the LICENSE file from Apache POI and
a lot of things that didn't belong there crept in.
I took it from the ODF Toolkit, which presumably came from
Although there seems to be some confusion in this area, I thought the LICENSE
file should be the Apache ALv2 license document alone and the NOTICE file
includes all of the third party stuff (as well as a simple ALv2 claim for the
overall combination).
I don't disagree with removing
On 10 October 2011 21:32, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Although there seems to be some confusion in this area, I thought the LICENSE
file should be the Apache ALv2 license document alone and the NOTICE file
includes all of the third party stuff (as well as a simple ALv2
Yes;
I think Rob took the LICENSE file from Apache POI and
a lot of things that didn't belong there crept in.
I cleaned it but perhaps my commit didn't express it well.
Pedro.
--- On Mon, 10/10/11, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Although there seems to be some
confusion
--- On Mon, 10/10/11, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Yes;
I'd recommend replacing with an authentic clean copy of the
license from some authoritative source, rather then trying
to guess what parts are wrong.
No problem. I took it from here:
