Subject: Re: License implications of build-time or test-time dependencies?
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
Hmm ...
We
On 21 October 2011 16:01, Herbert Dürr h...@apache.org wrote:
On 2011/10/20 11:12 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Sam Rubyru...@intertwingly.net
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Pedro
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 05:01:24PM +0200, Herbert Dürr wrote:
The gtk/qt issue is rather critcal: I do not think there is
previous history among Apache projects depending on them but if we
cannot consider those system provided libraries it would be
a serious setback to an early Apache release.
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
Hmm ...
We have discussed some of the things that must be replaced but we have not
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Another question that has come up based on review of OpenOffice code.
If a 3rd party module is used as part of the build or test automation,
but is not part of our release, do we care about whether it is
copyleft? Or do we
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
One observation, before it slips through. Depending on gpl#39;d compilers
and tools that we don#39;t carry in the release is fine AFAICT.
In our bootstrap procedure we use Dmake (gplv1), which we must remove in
favor of
Hmm ...
We have discussed some of the things that must be replaced but we have not
drawn a roadmap about it beyond the initial migration list. I think we will
have to open BZ issues for those.
The gtk/qt issue is rather critcal: I do not think there is previous history
among Apache projects
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
Hmm ...
We have discussed some of the things that must be replaced but we have not
drawn a roadmap about it beyond the initial migration list. I think we will
have to open BZ issues for those.
The gtk/qt issue is rather
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
Hmm ...
We have discussed some of the things that must be replaced but we have not
drawn a roadmap about it beyond the initial migration list. I think
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
Hmm ...
We have discussed some of the things that must be replaced but we have not
One observation, before it slips through. Depending on gpl#39;d compilers and
tools that we don#39;t carry in the release is fine AFAICT.
In our bootstrap procedure we use Dmake (gplv1), which we must remove in favor
of the external package, just like other OpenOffice forks do.
A more
11 matches
Mail list logo
