Hi guys;
I am not meaning to alienate the Brazilian community or
anything like that. Just wondering if there are thoughts
on BrOffice brand and releases.
AFAICT, BrOffice is not a trademark SUN owned so it was
not transferred to the ASF. I think the BrOffice people
will have to make a proposal
On 28 Nov 2011, at 18:24, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
I am not meaning to alienate the Brazilian community or
anything like that. Just wondering if there are thoughts
on BrOffice brand and releases.
I believe the BrOffice community joined the Document Foundation some time ago
and is now fully
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
Hi guys;
I am not meaning to alienate the Brazilian community or
anything like that. Just wondering if there are thoughts
on BrOffice brand and releases.
AFAICT, BrOffice is not a trademark SUN owned so it was
not
On 2011/10/28 16:43 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Is there a problem with just having a Brazilian Portuguese release of
Apache OpenOffice using the name Apache OpenOffice? That would be
the simplest thing to do.
This is basically what I believe we should do. As Simon showed, BrOffice
--- Lun 28/11/11, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org ha scritto:
..
- Are we (AOO) allowed to carry BrOffice branding
stuff
in our repository at all?
Why would we want to do that?
I don't know.. you brought it in ;) :
.
Best,
Jomar
-Original Message-
From: Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 10:59:25
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: What about BrOffice?
--- Lun 28/11/11, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org ha scritto:
..
- Are we (AOO
Am 11/28/2011 07:43 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Pedro Giffunip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi guys;
I am not meaning to alienate the Brazilian community or
anything like that. Just wondering if there are thoughts
on BrOffice brand and releases.
AFAICT, BrOffice is not a
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Nov 28, 2011 6:43 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
Hi guys;
...
AFAICT, BrOffice is not a trademark SUN owned so it was
not transferred to the
Hi,
Not quite the whole story, but ultimately does not matter. So I agree with
guys who think that here in Brazil the product has the name Apache
OpenOffice.
Rgds,
Luiz Oliveira
2011/11/28 Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Nov 28, 2011, at 10:59 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
--- Lun 28/11/11, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org ha scritto:
..
- Are we (AOO) allowed to carry BrOffice branding
stuff
in our repository at all?
Why would we want to do that?
I don't know.. you brought it in ;) :
Jomar Silva wrote:
We had to use BrOffice as the product name because OpenOffice
was a registered trademark in Brazil, and AFAIK Apache OpenOffice
will not have problems here.
If I recall correctly, the issue about OpenOffice being a registered
trademark (by some entity different than
Am 11/28/2011 11:54 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Jomar Silva wrote:
We had to use BrOffice as the product name because OpenOffice
was a registered trademark in Brazil, and AFAIK Apache OpenOffice
will not have problems here.
If I recall correctly, the issue about OpenOffice being a registered
OK;
I have a patch that removes every occurrence of BrOffice,
and the logos.
It actually makes branding simpler but I don't
know if my patch affects the packaging.
I found a reversely related bug in bugzilla so I put
up the patch for testing at:
13 matches
Mail list logo
