Hi,
On 27.09.2012 21:54, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Answering to myself ...
- Original Message -
From: Pedro Giffuni
...
Hi Ariel;
From: Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 09:27:23AM -0700, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
The big question here, at least
Hi,
On 27.09.2012 16:11, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Hi Pedro, *
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 08:47:31AM -0700, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Please note that many people did Windows (and linux and MacOSX)
builds just fine with the new boost. There was a problem similar to the
one recently reported that
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 09:27:23AM -0700, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
The big question here, at least for me, is why a boost update causes trouble
to stlport and why it only affects Windows.
Google lead me to
http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Can-t-build-boost-1-48-with-STLport-5-2-1-td4372308.html
Answering to myself ...
- Original Message -
From: Pedro Giffuni
...
Hi Ariel;
From: Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 09:27:23AM -0700, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
The big question here, at least for me, is why a boost update causes
trouble
Hi,
On 27.09.2012 17:16, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
On 27.09.2012 16:11, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Hi Pedro, *
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 08:47:31AM -0700, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Please note that many people did Windows (and linux and MacOSX)
builds just fine with the new boost. There
