Hi Rob,
Good questions. I'll play. You are seeking the boundary of what is permissible
to be called AOO, powered by AOO and not permitted. Possible answers below:
On Feb 29, 2012, at 8:48 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
FWIW;
On
On 28 February 2012 20:01, Donald Whytock dwhyt...@gmail.com wrote:
There was talk of a Powered by AOO logo. Maybe this should be
propogated up to the foundation to have an Apache Inside logo?
No, that is not how it (currently) works around here. Providing a
foundation wide Apache inside logo
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:34 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
On 28 February 2012 20:01, Donald Whytock dwhyt...@gmail.com wrote:
There was talk of a Powered by AOO logo. Maybe this should be
propogated up to the foundation to have an Apache Inside logo?
No, that is not how
On 29 February 2012 12:54, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:34 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
On 28 February 2012 20:01, Donald Whytock dwhyt...@gmail.com wrote:
There was talk of a Powered by AOO logo. Maybe this should be
propogated up to the
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
On 29 February 2012 12:54, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:34 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
On 28 February 2012 20:01, Donald Whytock dwhyt...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with Ross that the Powered by Logo and Policy is needed.
I won't have time to say more for a day or two,
Regards,
Dave
On Feb 29, 2012, at 5:55 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 29 February 2012 13:48, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Ross Gardler
On 2012-02-28 12:23 PM, flamin hotdog wrote:
hi, i was wondering where you stand on people selling open office. i know of
somebody who is selling open office on ebay for profit.
thanks andy
As other folks have commented, the Apache License is designed to be
permissive, in that third parties
FWIW;
On 02/29/12 07:54, Rob Weir wrote:
I don't see how this would have helped with Team OOo. Surely, the
logo issue was only a small part of the problem, a very small part.
Even if we had a powered by logo, there would have been the other
issues that were entirely irreconcilable with any
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
FWIW;
On 02/29/12 07:54, Rob Weir wrote:
I don't see how this would have helped with Team OOo. Surely, the
logo issue was only a small part of the problem, a very small part.
Even if we had a powered by logo, there
Am 29.02.12 17:48, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Pedro Giffunip...@apache.org wrote:
FWIW;
On 02/29/12 07:54, Rob Weir wrote:
I don't see how this would have helped with Team OOo. Surely, the
logo issue was only a small part of the problem, a very small part.
Even if
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Raphael Bircher
rbircher_...@bluewin.ch wrote:
Am 29.02.12 17:48, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Pedro Giffunip...@apache.org wrote:
FWIW;
On 02/29/12 07:54, Rob Weir wrote:
I don't see how this would have helped with Team OOo.
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
But the question is where do we draw the line?
Agreed.
At one pole, I think we all agree that released versions of AOO,
approved by the PMC and made available on the Apache mirrors,are
properly called Apache OpenOffice.
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Shane Curcuru a...@shanecurcuru.org wrote:
On 2012-02-28 12:23 PM, flamin hotdog wrote:
hi, i was wondering where you stand on people selling open office. i know
of somebody who is selling open office on ebay for profit.
thanks andy
As other folks have
On 02/29/12 11:48, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Pedro Giffunip...@apache.org wrote:
FWIW;
On 02/29/12 07:54, Rob Weir wrote:
I don't see how this would have helped with Team OOo. Surely, the
logo issue was only a small part of the problem, a very small part.
Even if
hi, i was wondering where you stand on people selling open office. i know of
somebody who is selling open office on ebay for profit.
thanks andy
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:23 PM, flamin hotdog
flamin_hot...@hotmail.com wrote:
hi, i was wondering where you stand on people selling open office. i know of
somebody who is selling open office on ebay for profit.
thanks andy
A similar question came up on the list last week. My response
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:23 PM, flamin hotdog
flamin_hot...@hotmail.com wrote:
hi, i was wondering where you stand on people selling open office. i know of
somebody who is selling open office on ebay for profit.
thanks andy
A similar question came up on the list last week. My response
stand on people selling open office. i know
of somebody who is selling open office on ebay for profit.
thanks andy
A similar question came up on the list last week. My response is here:
http://markmail.org/message/g6viii4ito6hhwim
In summary, the open source license permits selling CD's
...@hotmail.com wrote:
hi, i was wondering where you stand on people selling open office. i know
of somebody who is selling open office on ebay for profit.
thanks andy
A similar question came up on the list last week. My response is here:
http://markmail.org/message/g6viii4ito6hhwim
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:23 PM, flamin hotdog
flamin_hot...@hotmail.com wrote:
hi, i was wondering where you stand on people selling open office. i know of
somebody who is selling open office on ebay for profit.
thanks andy
Generally speaking, it's fine to take the code, compile
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Phillip Rhodes
motley.crue@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:23 PM, flamin hotdog
flamin_hot...@hotmail.com wrote:
hi, i was wondering where you stand on people selling open office. i know of
somebody who is selling open office on ebay
Rhodes
motley.crue@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:23 PM, flamin hotdog
flamin_hot...@hotmail.com wrote:
hi, i was wondering where you stand on people selling open office. i know
of somebody who is selling open office on ebay for profit.
thanks andy
Generally speaking, it's
22 matches
Mail list logo
