sebb wrote:
On 21 August 2012 22:23, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Why? Could very well have a publish all changes mode (the current
only option) alongside the cherry picking (publish only selected file)
mode.
This thread started because something was published inadvertently.
No, this thread started
On 22 August 2012 07:05, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 21 August 2012 22:23, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Why? Could very well have a publish all changes mode (the current
only option) alongside the cherry picking (publish only selected file)
mode.
This thread started
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:54 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 August 2012 07:05, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 21 August 2012 22:23, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Why? Could very well have a publish all changes mode (the current
only option) alongside the cherry
On 8/20/12 10:02 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 09:49:52PM +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
@all:
Sorry but IMHO this process failed. Just today evening (Hamburg
time) someone has published again website changes.
If we rely on a process that is so fragile, then IMHO we
Jürgen Schmidt wrote on Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 14:38:34 +0200:
On 8/20/12 10:02 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 09:49:52PM +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
@all:
Sorry but IMHO this process failed. Just today evening (Hamburg
time) someone has published again website
On 21 August 2012 13:43, Daniel Shahaf danie...@apache.org wrote:
Jürgen Schmidt wrote on Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 14:38:34 +0200:
On 8/20/12 10:02 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 09:49:52PM +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
@all:
Sorry but IMHO this process failed. Just
Am 08/21/2012 02:43 PM, schrieb Daniel Shahaf:
Jürgen Schmidt wrote on Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 14:38:34 +0200:
On 8/20/12 10:02 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 09:49:52PM +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
@all:
Sorry but IMHO this process failed. Just today evening (Hamburg
sebb wrote on Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 16:04:12 +0100:
On 21 August 2012 13:43, Daniel Shahaf danie...@apache.org wrote:
Jürgen Schmidt wrote on Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 14:38:34 +0200:
On 8/20/12 10:02 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 09:49:52PM +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
On 21 August 2012 22:23, Daniel Shahaf danie...@apache.org wrote:
sebb wrote on Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 16:04:12 +0100:
On 21 August 2012 13:43, Daniel Shahaf danie...@apache.org wrote:
Jürgen Schmidt wrote on Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 14:38:34 +0200:
On 8/20/12 10:02 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
Am 08/19/2012 10:45 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Dave Fisher wrote:
We were supposed to wait to publish.
Author: pescetti
Date: Sun Aug 19 15:08:26 2012
New Revision: 829379
What did I publish? If it was only (like the diff showed)
http://www.openoffice.org/it/stampa/comunicati/aoo341.html
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 09:49:52PM +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
@all:
Sorry but IMHO this process failed. Just today evening (Hamburg
time) someone has published again website changes.
If we rely on a process that is so fragile, then IMHO we shouldn't
do this. Because there will be always
Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote on Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 17:02:19 -0300:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 09:49:52PM +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
@all:
Sorry but IMHO this process failed. Just today evening (Hamburg
time) someone has published again website changes.
If we rely on a process that is
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
Dave Fisher wrote:
We were supposed to wait to publish.
Author: pescetti
Date: Sun Aug 19 15:08:26 2012
New Revision: 829379
What did I publish? If it was only (like the diff showed)
Marcus (OOo) wrote:
- who isn't aware of the consequences of her/his changes
(do you all know that a change on a NL webpage will also
publish everything else in staging?)
Yes, and I consider it a bug (an inconvenience, say). But anyway, the
most reasonable option to me is preparing the full
We were supposed to wait to publish.
Regards,
Dave
On Aug 19, 2012, at 8:08 AM, pesce...@apache.org wrote:
Author: pescetti
Date: Sun Aug 19 15:08:26 2012
New Revision: 829379
Log:
Publishing svnmucc operation to ooo-site site by pescetti
Added:
Dave Fisher wrote:
We were supposed to wait to publish.
Author: pescetti
Date: Sun Aug 19 15:08:26 2012
New Revision: 829379
What did I publish? If it was only (like the diff showed)
http://www.openoffice.org/it/stampa/comunicati/aoo341.html
then it's OK to have it online. It's not linked and
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.orgwrote:
Dave Fisher wrote:
We were supposed to wait to publish.
Author: pescetti
Date: Sun Aug 19 15:08:26 2012
New Revision: 829379
What did I publish? If it was only (like the diff showed)
17 matches
Mail list logo
