Re: DEV300 vs OOO340 (was: fetch-all-cws.sh)

2011-07-07 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On Jul 7, 2011, at 4:09 AM, Greg Stein wrote: On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 05:20, Mathias Bauer mathias_ba...@gmx.net wrote: ... (guess the fact that yours is smaller is caused by me having used DEV300 and you OOO340, so some CWSes that are empty for you have content for me) Indeed I got more

Re: fetch-all-cws.sh (was: Building a single Hg repository)

2011-07-07 Thread Mathias Bauer
On 07.07.2011 00:41, Simon Phipps wrote: On 6 Jul 2011, at 23:19, Rob Weir wrote: I think we're transitioning from a formally coordinated model led by a corporation to a model that will have less formal coordination structures. This is necessary to grow the project in the absence of

Re: Website Content plus Look and Feel Improvements

2011-07-07 Thread Graham Lauder
On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 08:34 -0700, Kay Schenk wrote: On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:39 AM, Graham Lauder yori...@openoffice.orgwrote: We had some earlier discussions on this. Personally, I was proposing that we take the opportunity to simplify. For example, right now we're doing all the

Re: fetch-all-cws.sh

2011-07-07 Thread Michael Stahl
On 06.07.2011 18:35, Herbert Duerr wrote: there is another tool, a HG extension called hg-git, which can convert HG bookmarks to git branches. http://hg-git.github.com/ Great find! I was already brushing up my python and mercurial internals skills to extend hg-fast-export's

Re: fetch-all-cws.sh (was: Building a single Hg repository)

2011-07-07 Thread Michael Stahl
On 06.07.2011 19:12, Greg Stein wrote: On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 07:50, Michael Stahlm...@openoffice.org wrote: On 05.07.2011 11:16, Herbert Duerr wrote: If the goal is to just merge the outstanding CWSs into trunk I'd suggest to stay with hg, merge all good CWSs into trunk and start the

Future of OOo

2011-07-07 Thread Ross Gardler
As this list knows i will be speaking at the 6th ODF Plugfest on what it means to OOo to be in the Apache Incubator. Since I am only a mentor and not a committer my presentation will focus on the Apache Way rather than the future of OOo. My intention is to communicate the open and, in particular,

Re: DITA for Doc?

2011-07-07 Thread Frank Peters
Rob, Would it be worth considering using DITA for the documentation/help? [...] I'd like to argue for the advantages of DITA as a source format here. I can probably find some volunteers to help enabled this. The Symphony team uses DITA for doc/help, and we've already done the work of

Re: Future of OOo

2011-07-07 Thread Donald Harbison
Hi Ross, Let's ensure an emphasis on this statement from the Rationale: ASF would enable corporate, non-profit, and volunteer stakeholders to contribute code in a collaborative fashion. The ASF's inclusive approach combined with the the recognition of LibreOffice community as an important and

Re: [DISCUSS] Creation of ooo-security List

2011-07-07 Thread Mathias Bauer
On 07.07.2011 02:21, Greg Stein wrote: I don't believe that we need our own security address since I doubt we'll have that many *incoming* issues. Those reports can go to secur...@apache.org, and that team will forward them to the PPMC. Many is a quantity that is hard to compare with ;-). From

Re: DITA for Doc?

2011-07-07 Thread Simon Phipps
Is this something that the committers actually planning to do the work want? It's not been clear to me which of the voices of this thread are among their number. Cheers S. On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote: Would it be worth considering using DITA for the

Re: OOO and LibreOffice.

2011-07-07 Thread Ross Gardler
On 6 July 2011 23:51, Andrew Rist andrew.r...@oracle.com wrote: To date the LibreOffice crew has taken the effort to merge in changes from the OOo code line, for each release. The most obvious and best way to collaborate in the future is to write good code, and make it worth their while to

Re: OOO and LibreOffice.

2011-07-07 Thread Ian Lynch
On 7 July 2011 12:09, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote: On 6 July 2011 23:51, Andrew Rist andrew.r...@oracle.com wrote: To date the LibreOffice crew has taken the effort to merge in changes from the OOo code line, for each release. The most obvious and best way to

Re: DITA for Doc?

2011-07-07 Thread Rob Weir
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 6:50 AM, Frank Peters fpe.mli...@googlemail.com wrote: Rob, Would it be worth considering using DITA for the documentation/help? [...] I'd like to argue for the advantages of DITA as a source format here. I can probably find some volunteers to help enabled this.  The

Re: DITA for Doc?

2011-07-07 Thread Rob Weir
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 7:26 AM, Mathias Bauer mathias_ba...@gmx.net wrote: Moin, I know how the help files where written at Sun/Oracle: the writers took Writer for the text and used a set of basic macros to put some markup into the files. Then they used an xslt to convert the document into

Re: Future of OOo

2011-07-07 Thread Rob Weir
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 6:26 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote: As this list knows i will be speaking at the 6th ODF Plugfest on what it means to OOo to be in the Apache Incubator. Since I am only a mentor and not a committer my presentation will focus on the Apache Way rather

Re: Website Content plus Look and Feel Improvements

2011-07-07 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Am 07/07/2011 11:25 AM, schrieb Graham Lauder: On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 08:34 -0700, Kay Schenk wrote: On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:39 AM, Graham Lauderyori...@openoffice.orgwrote: We had some earlier discussions on this. Personally, I was proposing that we take the opportunity to simplify.

Re: OOO and LibreOffice.

2011-07-07 Thread Mathias Bauer
On 07.07.2011 13:25, Ian Lynch wrote: On 7 July 2011 12:09, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote: On 6 July 2011 23:51, Andrew Rist andrew.r...@oracle.com wrote: To date the LibreOffice crew has taken the effort to merge in changes from the OOo code line, for each release.

Re: OOO and LibreOffice.

2011-07-07 Thread Ross Gardler
On 7 July 2011 13:10, Mathias Bauer mathias_ba...@gmx.net wrote: On 07.07.2011 13:09, Ross Gardler wrote: On 6 July 2011 23:51, Andrew Rist andrew.r...@oracle.com wrote: To date the LibreOffice crew has taken the effort to merge in changes from the OOo code line, for each release. The most

Re: DEV300 vs OOO340 (was: fetch-all-cws.sh)

2011-07-07 Thread Jens-Heiner Rechtien
On 07/07/2011 04:09 AM, Greg Stein wrote: On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 05:20, Mathias Bauermathias_ba...@gmx.net wrote: ... (guess the fact that yours is smaller is caused by me having used DEV300 and you OOO340, so some CWSes that are empty for you have content for me) Indeed I got more empty

Re: OOO and LibreOffice.

2011-07-07 Thread Ross Gardler
On 7 July 2011 13:17, Mathias Bauer mathias_ba...@gmx.net wrote: ... One thing would be to collaborate to remove any redundant code. I have heard that the LibO people have already worked on this so removing code should be something that is not too controversial license-wise and could filter

Re: OOO and LibreOffice.

2011-07-07 Thread Simon Phipps
On 7 Jul 2011, at 13:17, Mathias Bauer wrote: This would at least require that someone having done that at LO would contribute a patch for OOo. Having a patch could help to do the removal in the same way as in LO. That could make sure that afterwards the code bases became more similar and

Re: DITA for Doc?

2011-07-07 Thread TJ Frazier
On 7/7/2011 07:26, Mathias Bauer wrote: Moin, I know how the help files where written at Sun/Oracle: the writers took Writer for the text and used a set of basic macros to put some markup into the files. Then they used an xslt to convert the document into the xhp format. I can't speak for the

Re: DITA for Doc?

2011-07-07 Thread Shane Curcuru
Yes, that's a good question in terms of who the primary writers of this kind of help content are, and if they're participating in this thread. But it certainly sounds like there's enough positive feedback (and it seems Rob can draw on some experience around DITA) that it's definitely worth

Re: DITA for Doc?

2011-07-07 Thread Graham Lauder
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 07:52 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 7:26 AM, Mathias Bauer mathias_ba...@gmx.net wrote: Moin, I know how the help files where written at Sun/Oracle: the writers took Writer for the text and used a set of basic macros to put some markup into the

OpenOffice Security Vulnerability Reporting

2011-07-07 Thread Rob Weir
Bringing the threads together on the public list so we can (hopefully) quickly discuss. As I understand it now, the OpenOffice.org currently directs visitors to report vulnerability reports to securityt...@openoffice.org. This address is currently being monitored. And at Apache we ask

Re: Website Content plus Look and Feel Improvements

2011-07-07 Thread Shane Curcuru
http://blogs.apache.org/ Any PPMC member can simply ask infrastructure@ to create a blog for the podling (I think that's the right list), specifying the preferred name for the blog. The PPMC should manage a list of PPMC members who have write access to the blog, and ensure that comments

Re: OpenOffice Security Vulnerability Reporting

2011-07-07 Thread Simon Phipps
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote: Also, if securityt...@openoffice.org has a list of other security contacts with whom they routinely share pre-public disclosure security information, we'd appreciate having that list, sent to our private list:

Re: OOO and LibreOffice.

2011-07-07 Thread Simon Phipps
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote: On 7 Jul 2011, at 13:17, Mathias Bauer wrote: This would at least require that someone having done that at LO would contribute a patch for OOo.

Re: Future of OOo

2011-07-07 Thread IngridvdM
Hi Donald, Ross, all, Am 07.07.2011 12:56, schrieb Donald Harbison: [...] The end of a corporate controlled project, and the beginning of two new open source projects [...] I would like to change this part of the description. I think it should be made absolute clear to the public that the

Re: What is the advantage of the Apache OpenOffice.org Fork?

2011-07-07 Thread Rob Weir
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:01 AM, theUser BL theuse...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi! What is the advantage of the Apache OpenOffice.org Fork? Currently there are two point of views what a OOo fork is and what not. If you look at the trademark and logo, then LibreOffice is the fork. But if you

Re: Website Content plus Look and Feel Improvements

2011-07-07 Thread Kay Schenk
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Graham Lauder yori...@openoffice.orgwrote: On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 08:34 -0700, Kay Schenk wrote: On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:39 AM, Graham Lauder yori...@openoffice.org wrote: We had some earlier discussions on this. Personally, I was proposing that

Re: Website Content plus Look and Feel Improvements

2011-07-07 Thread Kay Schenk
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 07/07/2011 11:25 AM, schrieb Graham Lauder: On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 08:34 -0700, Kay Schenk wrote: On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:39 AM, Graham Lauderyori...@openoffice.org** wrote: We had some earlier discussions on

Re: Future of OOo

2011-07-07 Thread Simon Phipps
On 7 Jul 2011, at 16:03, IngridvdM wrote: Hi Donald, Ross, all, Am 07.07.2011 12:56, schrieb Donald Harbison: [...] The end of a corporate controlled project, and the beginning of two new open source projects [...] I would like to change this part of the description. I think it should

Re: Future of OOo

2011-07-07 Thread Rob Weir
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:03 AM, IngridvdM ingrid...@gmx-topmail.de wrote: Hi Donald, Ross, all, Am 07.07.2011 12:56, schrieb Donald Harbison: [...] The end of a corporate controlled project, and the beginning of two new open source projects [...] I would like to change this part of

Easy tasks and mentoring

2011-07-07 Thread Ross Gardler
Over in another thread there has been some discussion of easy tasks being identified to help newcomers find their way in the OOo project. In the ASF the Community Development project works to make ASF projects a little more accessible. Typically it's very scary for a newcomer, regardless of their

Re: DITA for Doc?

2011-07-07 Thread Dave Fisher
On Jul 7, 2011, at 6:11 AM, Shane Curcuru wrote: Yes, that's a good question in terms of who the primary writers of this kind of help content are, and if they're participating in this thread. But it certainly sounds like there's enough positive feedback (and it seems Rob can draw on some

Re: OpenOffice Security Vulnerability Reporting

2011-07-07 Thread Mark Thomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/07/2011 14:48, Rob Weir wrote: Bringing the threads together on the public list so we can (hopefully) quickly discuss. As I understand it now, the OpenOffice.org currently directs visitors to report vulnerability reports to

Regarding the PPMC's Private List

2011-07-07 Thread Rob Weir
We've received some criticism from our Mentors for using the private list too eagerly. I'm certainly guilty in that. I think the key thing is that the private list is for discussing matters that require privacy, but that this does not include discussing procedures around privacy and

Re: Regarding the PPMC's Private List

2011-07-07 Thread Donald Harbison
+1 On Jul 7, 2011 11:45 AM, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote: We've received some criticism from our Mentors for using the private list too eagerly. I'm certainly guilty in that. I think the key thing is that the private list is for discussing matters that require privacy, but that this does

Re: Future of OOo

2011-07-07 Thread IngridvdM
Hi Simon, Am 07.07.2011 17:26, schrieb Simon Phipps: On 7 Jul 2011, at 16:03, IngridvdM wrote: Hi Donald, Ross, all, Am 07.07.2011 12:56, schrieb Donald Harbison: [...] The end of a corporate controlled project, and the beginning of two new open source projects [...] I would like to

Re: DITA for Doc?

2011-07-07 Thread Mathias Bauer
On 07.07.2011 14:59, TJ Frazier wrote: On 7/7/2011 07:26, Mathias Bauer wrote: Moin, I know how the help files where written at Sun/Oracle: the writers took Writer for the text and used a set of basic macros to put some markup into the files. Then they used an xslt to convert the document

Re: OOO and LibreOffice.

2011-07-07 Thread Pedro F. Giffuni
--- On Thu, 7/7/11, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote: ... Hence the desire to see the work that has already been done on LO contributed here, rather than a related-but-different cleanup. All these contributions are hypothetical ... at least until we have a repository of our own. And

Re: Regarding the PPMC's Private List

2011-07-07 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Rob Weir wrote on Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 13:16:39 -0400: On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote: Rob Weir wrote on Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 11:44:33 -0400: 2) I wonder whether it would be a good idea, at least while the PPMC is still growing and we're

Re: [securityteam] OpenOffice Security Vulnerability Reporting

2011-07-07 Thread Matthias Huetsch
Hi Rob, all, On 07.07.11 15:48, Rob Weir wrote: Bringing the threads together on the public list so we can (hopefully) quickly discuss. As I understand it now, the OpenOffice.org currently directs visitors to report vulnerability reports to securityt...@openoffice.org. This address is

Re: [securityteam] Re: OpenOffice Security Vulnerability Reporting

2011-07-07 Thread Matthias Huetsch
Hi Simon, all, On 07.07.11 16:25, Simon Phipps wrote: On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com mailto:apa...@robweir.com wrote: Also, if securityt...@openoffice.org mailto:securityt...@openoffice.org has a list of other security contacts with whom they

Re: DITA for Doc?

2011-07-07 Thread Mathias Bauer
On 07.07.2011 18:52, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: --- On Thu, 7/7/11, Mathias Bauer mathias_ba...@gmx.net wrote: ... The macro package is available as an extension that can be installed with the extension manager. It also contains the xslt that is installed as an export filter. Just

Re: fetch-all-cws.sh (was: Building a single Hg repository)

2011-07-07 Thread Mathias Bauer
On 06.07.2011 19:08, Greg Stein wrote: On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 16:04, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Mathias Bauer mathias_ba...@gmx.net wrote: Moin, On 05.07.2011 18:14, Mathias Bauer wrote: ... Do we really want to have code in the svn repo that will

Re: DEV300 vs OOO340 (was: fetch-all-cws.sh)

2011-07-07 Thread Mathias Bauer
Hi Greg, On 07.07.2011 04:09, Greg Stein wrote: On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 05:20, Mathias Bauer mathias_ba...@gmx.net wrote: ... (guess the fact that yours is smaller is caused by me having used DEV300 and you OOO340, so some CWSes that are empty for you have content for me) Indeed I got more

Re: Regarding the PPMC's Private List

2011-07-07 Thread Rob Weir
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote: -1 on that part.  Please God, treat us like adults here. The analogy I had in mind was to official government committees and boards in my state, where they are required to conduct their business in public. But they

Re: DEV300 vs OOO340 (was: fetch-all-cws.sh)

2011-07-07 Thread Greg Stein
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 13:57, Mathias Bauer mathias_ba...@gmx.net wrote: Hi Greg, On 07.07.2011 04:09, Greg Stein wrote: On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 05:20, Mathias Bauer mathias_ba...@gmx.net wrote: ... (guess the fact that yours is smaller is caused by me having used DEV300 and you OOO340, so

Re: Future of OOo

2011-07-07 Thread Andrew Rist
apologies - bad form on my part. Andrew On 7/7/2011 11:19 AM, Andrew Rist wrote: I know it's soap opera stuff - but here, a Simon slap-down Oracle Email Signature Logo Andrew Rist | Interoperability Architect Oracle Corporate Architecture Group Redwood Shores, CA | 650.506.9847 On

Re: Future of OOo

2011-07-07 Thread Pedro F. Giffuni
--- On Thu, 7/7/11, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote: ... The original OpenOffice.org project is no more and that there are now two projects taking the code forward. Seems easy enough to understand and gives no scope for arguing about who is to blame for what. And uses neither the word

Re: Future of OOo

2011-07-07 Thread Simon Phipps
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Pedro F. Giffuni giffu...@tutopia.comwrote: I know you want to be politically correct and don't want to alienate other potential developers, but the undeniable facts are: The fact we could easily discuss this at length without ever agreeing what the

Re: Regarding the PPMC's Private List

2011-07-07 Thread Shane Curcuru
Hopefully we've discussed this enough this week that people will start to learn the rule of it should always be on the dev@ list unless there's a specific reason to use the private@ list, and that will be sufficient for the time being. On 7/7/2011 2:01 PM, Rob Weir wrote: On Thu, Jul 7, 2011

Re: Future of OOo

2011-07-07 Thread TJ Frazier
On 7/7/2011 16:52, Simon Phipps wrote: On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Pedro F. Giffunigiffu...@tutopia.comwrote: I know you want to be politically correct and don't want to alienate other potential developers, but the undeniable facts are: The fact we could easily discuss this at length

Re: Future of OOo

2011-07-07 Thread Ross Gardler
I want to make it clear that I have absolutely no intention of talking about the past in this presentation. I am not a part of OOo's history, other than being a Star Office user way back when it had a browser, mail client and calendar in addition to the current tools in OOo. I remember a Star

Re: OOO and LibreOffice.

2011-07-07 Thread Greg Stein
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:45, Pedro F. Giffuni giffu...@tutopia.com wrote: ... One of the things LibreOffice pretends to do, for example, is to remove Java as a dependency, a move that is not very attractive to Apache developers, I think. Bah. I'd *love* to get rid of a JVM dependency :-)

Re: Future of OOo

2011-07-07 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Asked for a screenshot? Here you are: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/StarOffice http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Datei:SO52_Desktopintegration.pngfiletimestamp=20090521112446 And already in German. ;-) I think for the license it should be OK when you name the source. When I remember

Re: OOO and LibreOffice.

2011-07-07 Thread Dave Fisher
On Jul 7, 2011, at 2:47 PM, Greg Stein wrote: On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:45, Pedro F. Giffuni giffu...@tutopia.com wrote: ... One of the things LibreOffice pretends to do, for example, is to remove Java as a dependency, a move that is not very attractive to Apache developers, I think.

Re: Future of OOo

2011-07-07 Thread Pedro Giffuni
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 21:55:08 +0100, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote: ... I assume you'll cover what Incubation at Apache is all about?  The tasks necessary to graduate form the backbone of our medium-term plan. Absolutely. The main body of the session will be about The Apache

RE: Future of OOo

2011-07-07 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
Ross, You might find some crisp talking points in the status report as well, since that text is being reviewed and will presumably be signed-off by a mentor before you embark for Berlin. - Dennis -Original Message- From: Ross Gardler [mailto:rgard...@opendirective.com] Sent:

Re: Future of OOo

2011-07-07 Thread Ross Gardler
On 7 July 2011 22:51, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Asked for a screenshot? Here you are: ... http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Datei:SO52_Desktopintegration.pngfiletimestamp=20090521112446 Perfect, thank you. Ross

Re: What is the advantage of the Apache OpenOffice.org Fork?

2011-07-07 Thread Jerry Kemp
One of the reasons I have stuck with OO and have not looked further into LO was the fact that binaries were not provided for my preferred desktop, Solaris. Specifically, I primarily use either OpenSolaris Nevada or OpenIndiana. A (more than high level but not completely extensive) search of the

Re: What is the advantage of the Apache OpenOffice.org Fork?

2011-07-07 Thread Rob Weir
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Jerry Kemp sun.mail.lis...@oryx.cc wrote: One of the reasons I have stuck with OO and have not looked further into LO was the fact that binaries were not provided for my preferred desktop, Solaris.  Specifically, I primarily use either OpenSolaris Nevada or

Re: What is the advantage of the Apache OpenOffice.org Fork?

2011-07-07 Thread Simon Phipps
On 8 Jul 2011, at 00:04, Jerry Kemp wrote: One of the reasons I have stuck with OO and have not looked further into LO was the fact that binaries were not provided for my preferred desktop, Solaris. Specifically, I primarily use either OpenSolaris Nevada or OpenIndiana. A (more than high

Re: Any interest in meeting in Berlin July 13th?

2011-07-07 Thread Ross Gardler
Sorry Rob, I missed this mail. As you know I will be there and I would love to touch base with you and any others who will be present. I haven't booked my flights and hotel yet, but will mail you offlist once I have my details settled. unfortunately I will probably not get there until the 14th.

Brazilian users list

2011-07-07 Thread luizh...@gmail.com
Hi, The Brazilian community [1] still maintains a minimum structure of support to users of OOo/Libo. I forwarded the questions that come to help single list in Brazil [2]. But, this week someone from the list of TDF did not like these referrals. Then I ask if we can start thinking about

Re: Any interest in meeting in Berlin July 13th?

2011-07-07 Thread Andrew Rist
Hey Ross I'll be there also, and I would also be interested in touching base all involved in the Apache effort. Andrew On 7/7/2011 4:43 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: Sorry Rob, I missed this mail. As you know I will be there and I would love to touch base with you and any others who will be