On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 11:12 +0100, David McKay wrote:
snip
On 09/07/11 07:58, eric b wrote:
The .org is and was always essential to the community.
Why? Out of the folk on the OOo forum who expressed an opinion to me, no
one liked it. It was a perpetual reminder that the product
Reizinger Zoltán wrote:
The two sites works sporadically, needs four five web page refresh to load:
http://templates.services.openoffice.org/
http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/
To help OOo present users, needs to stabilize sites work.
Somebody knows what the cause of this problem.
On 07/08/2011 02:46 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Ross Gardlerrgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
Sorry Rob, I missed this mail. As you know I will be there and I would
love to touch base with you and any others who will be present. I
haven't booked my flights and hotel
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 7:06 AM, Graham Lauder yori...@openoffice.org wrote:
On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 11:12 +0100, David McKay wrote:
snip
On 09/07/11 07:58, eric b wrote:
The .org is and was always essential to the community.
Why? Out of the folk on the OOo forum who expressed an opinion
Hi Gav,
Could you add Chart as category? Charts can be inserted into text
documents, spreadsheets and presentations, so they do not fit into one
of the given categories.
Thanks a lot!
Ingrid
Gavin McDonald wrote:
Hi All,
I created Categories 'Writer, Calc, Impress, Draw and Base'
I'd
On 09.07.2011 06:19, L'oiseau de mer wrote:
if without setting CC and CXX, configure will use gcc and appear ld error.
if CC=cc and CXX=CC , configure will appear :
checking for cc... /opt/solstudio12.2/bin//cc
checking the SunStudio C/C++ compiler version... configure: error:
found version
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 07:36 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
As Peter Junge has stated, this discussion has a repetitive deja vu feel
about it.
It would only be repetitive if circumstances were the same. They
aren't. Perhaps the full magnitude of this has not hit, but things
are very different
+1 for having ooo-secur...@incubator.apache.org, because
- old OOo mailing lists will probably die some day
- other people are now participating in Apache OOo, who don't work
on OOo/LO
- (Old) OOo doesn't release security updates anymore, I guess.
I am still on vacation until 06/25. That the
Hi,
Von: Javier Sola li...@khmeros.info
This product competes with another one whose main disadvantage is not
having the name OpenOffice.org, and who is already producing working
software, more advanced that this project at this time, and getting the
favor of some distributions.
So -
--- En date de : Lun 11.7.11, Graham Lauder yori...@openoffice.org a écrit :
[...]
I'm just mindful that change for change sake is not
a reason to dump an established brand and
in fact change in the rest of the infrastructure is an
excellent reason
for retention and strengthening of that
On 7/11/2011 07:28, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Reizinger Zoltán wrote:
The two sites works sporadically, needs four five web page refresh to load:
http://templates.services.openoffice.org/
http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/
To help OOo present users, needs to stabilize sites work.
Somebody
On 11 Jul 2011, at 14:16, Andre Schnabel wrote:
So - if the Apache project does not want to use the brand OpenOffice.org,
maybe ask Oracle to hand it over to TDF instead.
Ok, just joking - I would not expect this to happen.
More than that, as far as I can tell TDF are perfectly happy with
Hi all,
I like OpenOffice.org.
But I would like to ask Japanese OpenOffice.org users what they think
about the name of the product they are using now.
We, OpenOffice.org Japanese Language Project, has strictly applied the
policy[1] to our marketing and promotion of OpenOffice.org in Japan
and
On 07/11/2011 04:06 AM, Graham Lauder wrote:
On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 11:12 +0100, David McKay wrote:
snip
On 09/07/11 07:58, eric b wrote:
The .org is and was always essential to the community.
Why? Out of the folk on the OOo forum who expressed an opinion to me, no
one liked it. It was a
Kay Schenk wrote:
On 07/11/2011 04:06 AM, Graham Lauder wrote:
On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 11:12 +0100, David McKay wrote:
snip
On 09/07/11 07:58, eric b wrote:
The .org is and was always essential to the community.
Why? Out of the folk on the OOo forum who expressed an opinion to me, no
Hi André
2011/7/11 Andre Schnabel andre.schna...@gmx.net:
Hi,
[...]
So - if the Apache project does not want to use the brand OpenOffice.org,
maybe ask Oracle to hand it over to TDF instead.
+1 ;-)
Ok, just joking - I would not expect this to happen.
But anyway - everyone who would
Hi Ingrid,
Could you add Chart as category? Charts can be inserted into text documents,
spreadsheets and presentations, so they do not fit into one of the given
categories.
I added the Chart category.
Thanks a lot!
Ingrid
Gavin McDonald wrote:
Hi All,
I created Categories
Am 07/11/2011 05:18 PM, schrieb Andy Brown:
Kay Schenk wrote:
On 07/11/2011 04:06 AM, Graham Lauder wrote:
On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 11:12 +0100, David McKay wrote:
snip
On 09/07/11 07:58, eric b wrote:
The .org is and was always essential to the community.
Why? Out of the folk on the OOo
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Andre Schnabel andre.schna...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi,
Von: Javier Sola li...@khmeros.info
This product competes with another one whose main disadvantage is not
having the name OpenOffice.org, and who is already producing working
software, more advanced that this
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Andre Schnabel andre.schna...@gmx.net
wrote:
Hi,
Von: Javier Sola li...@khmeros.info
This product competes with another one whose main disadvantage is not
having the name
Hi,
Am 11.07.2011 18:39, schrieb Rob Weir:
From a branding perspective you did have the opportunity to start
fresh, but you did not go with a .org name.
It did not matter that we had the opportunity to start fresh - what
really did matter was that we *had to* start fresh.
Anyway -
2011/7/11 André Schnabel andre.schna...@gmx.net:
Hi,
Am 11.07.2011 18:39, schrieb Rob Weir:
From a branding perspective you did have the opportunity to start
fresh, but you did not go with a .org name.
It did not matter that we had the opportunity to start fresh - what really
did matter
On 11 July 2011 17:58, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
2011/7/11 André Schnabel andre.schna...@gmx.net:
Hi,
Am 11.07.2011 18:39, schrieb Rob Weir:
From a branding perspective you did have the opportunity to start
fresh, but you did not go with a .org name.
It did not matter
Javier Sola wrote on Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 18:43:17 +0700:
If Apache forced this without discussion it would be a bad start for
the project.
You're misportraying the facts; it's a preexisting Apache policy that
predates OOo being proposed as a podling.
Now, we're generally reasonable people
2011/7/11 Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com:
2011/7/11 André Schnabel andre.schna...@gmx.net:
Hi,
Am 11.07.2011 18:39, schrieb Rob Weir:
From a branding perspective you did have the opportunity to start
fresh, but you did not go with a .org name.
It did not matter that we had the opportunity
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Manfred A. Reiter ma.rei...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/7/11 Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com:
2011/7/11 André Schnabel andre.schna...@gmx.net:
Hi,
Am 11.07.2011 18:39, schrieb Rob Weir:
From a branding perspective you did have the opportunity to start
fresh, but you
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.namewrote:
Javier Sola wrote on Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 18:43:17 +0700:
If Apache forced this without discussion it would be a bad start for
the project.
You're misportraying the facts; it's a preexisting Apache policy that
On Jul 11, 2011, at 10:41 AM, Danese Cooper wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Daniel Shahaf
d...@daniel.shahaf.namewrote:
Javier Sola wrote on Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 18:43:17 +0700:
If Apache forced this without discussion it would be a bad start for
the project.
You're
Hi Greg,
On Friday, 2011-07-08 15:22:36 -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
I'm going to suggest we do this:
3. as sibling to trunk and our other high-level directories:
ooo/trunk/...
ooo/l10n/...
+1
That has the advantage of avoiding the l10n data when working on
trunk. When we copy
On 07/11/2011 10:37 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Manfred A. Reiterma.rei...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/7/11 Rob Weirapa...@robweir.com:
2011/7/11 André Schnabelandre.schna...@gmx.net:
Hi,
Am 11.07.2011 18:39, schrieb Rob Weir:
From a branding perspective you did
It seems to me that a lot of the problem arises in keeping the
development project and the product brand names exactly the same.
If there are indeed going to to be 2 websites, OpenOffice.org which is
where end users go to get the product, help, etc. and the
tbd.apache.org where the
+1
That works for me, conceptually. I don't have any history with OpenOffice.org,
the project, however, so I intend to stay neutral on how this gets thrashed out.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2011 16:54
To:
32 matches
Mail list logo
