RE: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

2012-04-21 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
=0, abstain (PPMC) -Original Message- From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@googlemail.com] Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 17:58 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; ooo-priv...@incubator.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1 [ ... ] Please vote on

[DISCUSS] [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

2012-04-21 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
Some formalities: 1. Please do not discuss the voting on the [VOTE] thread. It makes it more difficult to track the individual votes. Use a [DISCUSS][VOTE] thread instead. 2. Please cast all votes on ooo-dev@ incubator.apache.org. Cross-posting to ooo-private by non-PPMC members simply

[DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

2012-04-21 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
What does release-candidate voting at the Apache OpenOffice podling mean? Is it is just an assessment of support/sentiment, or is there more involved? The ballot has this phrasing: But we invite all people to vote (non-binding) on this RC. We would like to provide a release that is

RE: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

2012-04-21 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
My oversight: There is a consolidated link to all of the QA locations for the Release Candidate at http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Quality_Assurance#Apache_OpenOffice_3.4. -Original Message- From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:orc...@apache.org] Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2012

R: Python in Windows version of Apache OpenOffice

2012-04-21 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi Yakov; --- Sab 21/4/12, Yakov Reztsov yakovr...@mail.ru ha scritto: ... I review Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) release candidate 1 (RC1) is based on the svn revision 1327774 (Windows version) Python operator license()  type Apache license in this version. I am not sure I

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

2012-04-21 Thread Pedro Giffuni
+1 (PPMC) I think in it's current state the code has the level required to be considered the qualified successor of OpenOffice.org. Considering the size of the task I want to congratulate our developers and the Apache infra team for working so hard to make this wonderful release in such a short

Re: [RELEASE]: status update for our first RC

2012-04-21 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
Hi Lily, * On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 05:50:37PM +0800, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 4/20/12 4:10 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: Hi Lily, On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 4:58 AM, xia zhaolilyzh...@gmail.com wrote: Is the langauge package be built as well? Lily At least me, I've built Linux

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

2012-04-21 Thread Hagar Delest
+1 (PPMC) NB: installed the 64bit DEB on Ubuntu 11.10, no problem for the moment. Thanks for this code release! Hagar Le Sat, 21 Apr 2012 08:58:24 +0800, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com a écrit : Hi all, this is a call for vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

2012-04-21 Thread Kay Schenk
On 04/21/2012 01:01 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: What does release-candidate voting at the Apache OpenOffice podling mean? Is it is just an assessment of support/sentiment, or is there more involved? The ballot has this phrasing: But we invite all people to vote (non-binding) on this RC.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

2012-04-21 Thread Larry Gusaas
+1 (non-binding) Larry On 2012-04-20 6:58 PM Jürgen Schmidt wrote: this is a call for vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating). This will be the first incubator release for Apache OpenOffice and a key milestone to continue the success of OpenOffice.org.

RE: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

2012-04-21 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
@Kay, I have no idea. I trust that someone else can indicate how this works. Having successfully built from source seems to be a key requirement, and one would hope that at least three people confirm that. Of course, there is support for some many platforms and user configurations that I

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

2012-04-21 Thread Juergen Schmidt
On Sunday, 22. April 2012 at 08:42, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: @Kay, I have no idea. I trust that someone else can indicate how this works. Having successfully built from source seems to be a key requirement, and one would hope that at least three people confirm that. Of course, there