On 3/1/12 1:51 PM, Herbert Duerr wrote:
On 01.03.2012 13:05, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
From my point of view issue 118424 -
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118424 - is not a blocker
for AOO 3.4, because this issue already occurs in former versions of
OpenOffice.org, at
Hi,
a further issue in the blocker340 query
Can somebody confirm this issue? In general I would say it's no (-1)
show stopper issue for me.
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118445
Juergen
Hi,
and another one https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118012
I can't reproduce this issue on Windows 7 and MacOS (10.7). Anybody who
can confirm this issue on Vista with our latest dev snapshot?
Juergen
On 3/1/12 10:30 AM, xia zhao wrote:
*AOO 3.4 Overall QA Status:*
Based on the test plan:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Release-QA-Plan
80% IP clearance testing have been done. These are the tests of areas most
impacted by removed/replaced modules due to IP clearance.
80%
On 3/1/12 2:28 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
and another one https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118012
I can't reproduce this issue on Windows 7 and MacOS (10.7). Anybody who
can confirm this issue on Vista with our latest dev snapshot?
I have to correct it, I can reproduce
On 3/1/12 3:00 PM, Yuri Dario wrote:
Hi Andre,
Ah, sorry, I just saw that you where the last to touch it.
I'm also the one who committed it initially, and changed it over the
years.
Does anybody object to deleting this file?
me. but I understand it is a specific file I can mantain
On 3/1/12 3:32 PM, Raphael Bircher wrote:
Am 01.03.12 15:28, schrieb Rory O'Farrell:
On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:16:33 +
Ross Gardlerrgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
I'm assuming no dictionary is included since every word I have
is reported as being spelt wrong.
As far as I know the
On 3/1/12 5:00 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Jürgen Schmidt
jogischm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi
I have change the release blocker flag for issues
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118366
I think it's a normal issue that we should fix but it is no show
On 3/1/12 5:07 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
--- Gio 1/3/12, Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org ha scritto:
Oliver-Rainer Wittmannorwittm...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I would like to start the discussions on requested
release blocker issues
for our AOO 3.4 release.
I am starting with issue 118435 -
On 3/1/12 5:03 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
--- Gio 1/3/12, Jürgen Schmidtjogischm...@googlemail.com ha scritto:
...
But we still need feedback about the dictionaries people
would like to bundle for their language. See
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Bundled+Writing+Aids
On 3/2/12 9:23 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Hi imcat,
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 11:02:32AM +0800, imacat wrote:
On 2012/03/01 00:21, Ariel Constenla-Haile said:
I've uploaded hu, ru, and zh-TW langpacks for Linux 32 and 64 bits.
On 3/2/12 10:18 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
On 02.03.2012 09:47, Raphael Bircher wrote:
Am 02.03.12 09:21, schrieb Andre Fischer:
On 02.03.2012 02:19, Raphael Bircher wrote:
Hi at all
I just import the date... takes same time but it works now.
That is great news. Could you describe in a few
On 3/2/12 1:38 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
Issue 117995 - https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=117995 - is
from my point of view no release blocker as this issue already occurs at
least in OOo 3.1
There also seems to exist a workaround - see issue comments.
I agree that
On 3/2/12 1:58 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
Issue 118013 - https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118013 - is
not a release blocker for AOO 3.4 from my point of view.
I have reproduced the defect in OOo 3.1 and OOo 3.3. Also in OOo 2.2 the
alignment does not work correctly.
I
On 3/2/12 2:38 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
Issue - https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118098 - is no AOO
3.4 release blocker from my point of view. I have reproduced this defect
in OOo 3.1 and OOo 3.4
I agree again
Juergen
Best regards, Oliver.
P.S.: Sorry for the
On 3/2/12 3:49 PM, FR web forum wrote:
Hello,
On Pootle svx / source / intro.po
We have the #1 string with:
Copyright © 2000, 2011 Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.\n
This product was created by %OOOVENDOR, based on OpenOffice.org.\n
OpenOffice.org acknowledges all community
On 3/2/12 4:01 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 3/2/12 3:49 PM, FR web forum wrote:
Hello,
On Pootle svx / source / intro.po
We have the #1 string with:
Copyright © 2000, 2011 Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights
reserved.\n
This product was created by %OOOVENDOR, based on OpenOffice.org.\n
On 3/2/12 4:05 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 3/2/12 4:01 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 3/2/12 3:49 PM, FR web forum wrote:
Hello,
On Pootle svx / source / intro.po
We have the #1 string with:
Copyright © 2000, 2011 Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights
reserved.\n
This product was created
On 3/2/12 4:34 PM, FR web forum wrote:
But this is still true, let us check the English sources first
OK I'll wait
Other string in scp2 / source / ooo.po #322
folderitem_ooo.ulf#STR_FI_TOOLTIP_SOFFICE.LngText.text
The office productivity suite compatible to the open
and standardized ODF
Hi,
I would like to propose that we prepare the next set of dev snapshots
based on the revision r1296933, which correspond to our last changed
revision r1296433. The linux buildbot has successfully build this
revision and I think we can use it for the next snapshot builds.
The planned RC
On 3/2/12 6:38 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
On 2012-02-29 8:18 AM Rob Weir wrote:
Once you have installed, launch OpenOffice and look at the Help/About
box. If the revision shown there matches the build you installed
(e..g, r1293550) then the install was a success. Please send a short
note to
On 3/3/12 12:02 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Mar 2, 2012, at 2:46 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 03/02/2012 11:30 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 03/02/2012 10:49 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Marcus
On 3/5/12 1:11 PM, Очиров Николай wrote:
Thank you!! But It still doesn't work! I tried to use ''make'', but it didn't
work. What is this command - build? Where did it take?
build is an alias to execute a perl build script. Have you sourced the
prepared environment script after you run
On 3/6/12 10:08 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi
On 05.03.2012 09:57, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose that we prepare the next set of dev snapshots
based on
the revision r1296933, which correspond to our last changed revision
r1296433.
The linux buildbot has successfully
is for
OpenOffice and the extensions should run on Apache OpenOffice as well if
there is no minimal version dependency. What is exactly your point with
the rebranding?
Apache OpenOffice = the continuation of OpenOffice.org
Juergen
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Jürgen Schmidt
to rebrand the Extensions
and Templates pages at SourceForge quite so strongly, since the only
extensions that are there now are for OO.o (and perhaps LibreOffice).
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 02:06
On 3/6/12 2:24 PM, wawalovo wrote:
Can you see this?
yes ;-)
Juergen
在 2012-3-6，下午1:39，Liu Da Liwawal...@gmail.com 写道：
Dear all,
I build an extension with Netbean6.8 + OpenOffice API plugin, All functions
in the extension work well on the last developer snapshot build.
But when I
Hi,
can anybody tell me where we are with the Url redirects to the new
extensions repository.
We have for example https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118976
as show stopper issue
Do we have specific problems with the redirects?
And can we use short Urls for
Hi,
I would like to send out the following email to the general incubator
mailing list to ask for early feedback related the general Apache
requirements. The main intention is to address potential issues asap and
to save time later on.
Any opinions or improvements?
Juergen
###
Hi,
the
On 3/7/12 12:05 AM, Donald Whytock wrote:
Grammar-weenie-ing:
We did a lot of IP clearance work to become Apache conform
That sentence structure suggests compliant instead of conform, as
in to become Apache-compliant. Alternately, you can say IP
clearance work to conform to Apache standards
Hi,
after the latest information (thanks Regina) we get about this issue
[1], I think it is no show stopper for the 3.4.
It seems a problem with the path length. If the path is longer than 72
(which of course is not long) we run in trouble on these systems. The
font cache can't be created.
On 3/7/12 8:04 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
after the latest information (thanks Regina) we get about this issue
[1], I think it is no show stopper for the 3.4.
It seems a problem with the path length. If the path is longer than 72
(which of course is not long) we run in trouble
On 3/7/12 1:49 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Jürgen Schmidt
jogischm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
based on Andre's analysis [1] and documentation I have created a new
en-US.sdf file [2] containing the currently used English strings.
I think we can use this as base
Hi,
if I get no further feedback or concerns I will post it tomorrow.
Juergen
On 3/7/12 7:28 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 3/7/12 12:05 AM, Donald Whytock wrote:
Grammar-weenie-ing:
We did a lot of IP clearance work to become Apache conform
That sentence structure suggests compliant instead
On 3/7/12 9:27 PM, FR web forum wrote:
Bonjour,
I finished the translation for fr-FR on Pootle.
I don't know what is the next step.
I think the latest English resources that I have prepared yesterday are
not yet uploaded.
Juergen
On 3/8/12 4:11 AM, lou ql wrote:
I'm testing IP clearance-libneon these days. You can find the details from
here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/IP_Clearance+Impact
To test WebDAV supporting, I set up a simple WebDAV server. It's the first
time for me to do this, and I
On 3/8/12 11:18 AM, Lei Wang wrote:
Hi,
Issue 119024 - https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119024 -
should be closed as it can not be reproduced in AOO3.4 rev 1296433 from my
point of view. If anyone can reproduce this issue in the latest AOO3.4
build(rev 1296433), please add
Hi
I wasn't able to reproduce the issue [1] on my XP but have prepared a
new test version under
http://people.apache.org/~jsc/developer-snapshots/windows/OOo_3.4.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
including the redistributables.
Maybe somebody with the problem can try to install this version but
On 3/8/12 4:39 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 11:37:48AM -0300, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Another issue is the path to the repo: now it is determined by
File::Spec-catfile($ENV{'SRC_ROOT'}, File::Spec-updir())
Moving one dir. up trunk/main will only work if you
On 3/8/12 3:37 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Hi Jürgen,
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 03:32:30PM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
i have changed the about dialog box a little bit and would like to
get your feedback.
I added a new key in the version.ini/versionrc
Revision=svn_revison_number
Any
I have to confess that I don't have any clue what to do with this issue [1].
We have a target in instset_native/util to build a updatepack but it
breaks on my Linux system when it tries to build a Germany language
pack. But I have no language selected and it should build en-US only.
Do we
Hi,
to fix Issue 119004 we have to pack the vc redistributables which were
in the past packed always by the release engineers in HH.
This will be a new prerequisite for Windows from now on. Copy
vcredist_x86.exe and vcredist_x64.exe in the directory
external/vcredist.
You can download
On 3/8/12 9:23 PM, Roberto Salomon wrote:
I am sorry if this has already been discussed but I lost a few messages...
With the Pootle server on-line, I plan on calling on the pt_BR community to
revise and improve the Brazilian translation for AOO.
User registration on Apache's Pootle server,
On 3/8/12 10:04 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
HI Jürgen,
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 05:47:01PM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
I have to confess that I don't have any clue what to do with this issue [1].
We have a target in instset_native/util to build a updatepack but
it breaks on my Linux
.
Juergen
Hans
-Original Message-
From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 11:42 AM
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [RELEASE]: 119004 - available test build
Hi
I wasn't able to reproduce the issue [1] on my XP but have prepared
On 3/9/12 1:26 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Hi Jürgen,
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 08:36:18AM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 3/8/12 10:04 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
HI Jürgen,
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 05:47:01PM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
I have to confess that I don't have any clue
On 3/11/12 6:50 AM, Greg Madden wrote:
Debian stable amd64 box.
New install, full normal install set/desktop integration. Installs
perfectly, menu item installed. 'dpkg -i ~/*.deb'
I use the table function in writer, full page tables, document
fidelity from 9 years of my OO archives is awesome
Hi,
I would like to inform you that I am currently investigating a complete
round trip for translations and try to understand how it works in detail.
resources - sdf - po - translation - po - sdf - resources -
build office
I think it is important that we first understand and know how the
On 3/12/12 3:29 AM, lou ql wrote:
On 9 March 2012 18:10, eric beric.bach...@free.fr wrote:
Hi,
Disclaimer : the mail is not well quoted, so I'm not sure who I'm
answering. Apologies if ever my answer is not clear.
Le 9 mars 12 à 03:05, lou ql a écrit :
2. a dialog appears asking for
Hi,
the windows build bot still has problems with the new introduced build
prerequisite vcredist_**.exe
Can somebody with access to the build bots add the new requirements.
See
Hi,
I would like to propose that we prepare the next set of dev snapshots
based on the revision r1299571 (same as last changed revision). It is
not the latest working buildbot revision but I would like to include an
increased buildid.
It is still no a official RC because of the existing
On 3/12/12 10:05 AM, rjaas...@saunalahti.fi wrote:
Jürgen Schmidt [jogischm...@googlemail.com] kirjoitti:
Hi,
I would like to propose that we prepare the next set of dev snapshots
based on the revision r1299571 (same as last changed revision). It is
not the latest working buildbot revision
On 3/12/12 1:50 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
I jest,of course.
But seriously, there are some claiming that all of the
OpenOffice.org project went over to LibreOffice and that the Apache
has zero experience with this code base. I know this sounds crazy,
but how can we best refute that statement?
Here's
On 3/12/12 4:34 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
On 12 Mar 2012, at 12:50, Rob Weir wrote:
I jest,of course.
But seriously, there are some claiming that all of the
OpenOffice.org project went over to LibreOffice and that the Apache
has zero experience with this code base. I know this sounds crazy,
On 3/12/12 5:19 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
On 12 Mar 2012, at 16:08, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 3/12/12 4:34 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
Out of interest, where have you seen that statement from an authoritative
source? The former community seems spread between the AOO project and
LibreOffice to me
On 3/12/12 11:28 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Andrew Ristandrew.r...@oracle.comwrote:
On 3/12/2012 9:14 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
2012/3/12 Jürgen
Schmidtjogischmidt@**googlemail.comjogischm...@googlemail.com
Hi,
I would like to propose that we prepare the
On 3/13/12 8:09 AM, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
Here a quick update, see below.
The plan is to transparently migrate users authenticating at
OpenOffice.org to the Extensions, by storing locally their
credentials. For the time being their email addresses will stay
@openoffice.org, but the idea is
On 3/13/12 8:50 AM, Clarence GUO wrote:
This bug can not be reproduced on DEV300m100(Build: 9751)
I don't know which build you are using here. Please try it with our
latest developer snapshots that you can find under
on this to help you and the others with
AOO related infra requests.
Juergen
A.
On 3/12/2012 12:54 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
the windows build bot still has problems with the new introduced build
prerequisite vcredist_**.exe
Can somebody with access to the build bots add the new requirements.
See
On 3/13/12 9:15 AM, Clarence GUO wrote:
I just used a OpenOffice3.4 build instead of AOO to verify. I meant it
should be a regression defect.
ah ok, thanks for clarification.
Juergen
Clarence
2012/3/13 Jürgen Schmidtjogischm...@googlemail.com
On 3/13/12 8:50 AM, Clarence GUO wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 3/13/12 5:25 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
Hi all,
Probably because of all the progress being made towards a v3.4 release, I have
been getting an increasing number of enquiries about the status of Apache
OpenOffice from a variety of sources. I'm attempting, in good faith, to
On 3/14/12 4:39 AM, lifeng wang wrote:
Hi, all
I propose Bug 118760 as AOO 3.4 release blocker. This defect will crash
presentation.
crashes are not good +1
Juergen
scenario: Merge and Split Vertically to the same cell, then undoredo.
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118760
On 3/13/12 11:36 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
You're entitled to a dissenting opinion as an individual,
but shaping the marketplace is not part of what we do
as a public charity. Just look at how the subversion
project has handled contributions related to git migration tools
for instance (yes you
On 3/14/12 12:48 AM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
On 2012-03-13 3:33 PM Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Larry Gusaaslarry.gus...@gmail.com
wrote:
None of which answer my question. Shouldn't the release be Apache
OpenOffice 3.4?
The wiki page
On 3/13/12 10:50 PM, eric b wrote:
Hi Rob,
Le 13 mars 12 à 22:36, Rob Weir a écrit :
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:33 PM, eric b eric.bach...@free.fr wrote:
Hi,
With the legacy lists shuting down soon, I'd like to propose the
creation of
several French mailing lists.
The previous one were :
improvements:
will coming later but I think we have a lot room for improvements here ;-)
Any opinions, questions, feedback or comments? I am really looking
forward to improve the whole translation process with you together.
Juergen
PS: who has some more grey hairs now ;-)
On 3/11/12 10:01 AM, Jürgen
Hi Claudio,
On 3/14/12 4:14 AM, Claudio Filho wrote:
Hi
I finished a initial revision of translation for pt-BR of UI. I filled this
issue[1].
[1]https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119061
But i have some questions about the occurrences of Oracle in many
strings, related below. Some
Hi,
On 3/14/12 10:53 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
I would like to give a short update on the progress I have made so far.
- I was able to setup a local Pootle server for my testing purposes. So
far so good ;-)
- I created a new SDF file based on the current available resources
- Based
On 3/14/12 6:08 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I would recommend that no one respond to the following:
http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2012/03/14/brand-confusion/
It really serves no purpose to do so.
I would also suggest that those who intent is to simply stir this
kind of stuff
Am Mittwoch, 14. März 2012 schrieb Claudio Filho filh...@gmail.com:
Hi
2012/3/14 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com
Ok, it looks better now. After a further test I had no read errors of the
new generated template files and de has now 89977 words.
German - 4053 words need attention
On 3/14/12 8:28 PM, Claudio Filho wrote:
Hi
2012/3/14 Jürgen Schmidtjogischm...@googlemail.com
Am Mittwoch, 14. März 2012 schrieb Claudio Filhofilh...@gmail.com:
Jürgen, you wish to say words or strings? How many *strings* (lines)
have the last SDF?
Pootle counts 89977 words. But I have
On 3/16/12 4:26 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
On 03/16/12 10:03, Rob Weir wrote:
FWIW,
I suspended some rather cool but drastic updates
that I was planning, including updating the internal
python and Apache Commons, to ensure a softer
landing of the release. Expect a lot of chaos
afterwards ;).
On 3/19/12 9:07 AM, Huaidong Qiu wrote:
Hi,
I want to know more about the translation process we are using.
What tools are we using to extract English string from the source tree? Is
this an automated process?
Thanks to Andre who have started to document his analysis on the whole
process
Hi,
my initial plan was to propose a RC candidate today but we got some
feedback from the IPMC mailing list that we should integrate besides the
last show stopper issue.
Issue:
Bug 118895 - aoo3.4 r1240836: some contextmenu entries are not localized
This issue makes me nervous as long as we
On 3/19/12 8:40 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hello;
--- Lun 19/3/12, Shenfeng Liuliush...@gmail.com ha scritto:
...
Data: Lunedì 19 marzo 2012, 01:29
Pedro,
You can see from the test plan
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Release-QA-Plan
, that
the IP clearance testing that
Hi
On 3/18/12 6:04 PM, Reizinger Zoltán wrote:
Hi,
I just fished missing tranlslation of UI strings, in pootle.
Please use this for next developers release of HU langpack.
I keep working on help files.
Regards,
Zoltan
Thanks a lot for your work so far.
Unfortunately you have missed my email
Hi,
I think issue 119090 is no show stopper from my point of view. The new
default provides a better security than before when I understand it
correct. And if people detect potential problems they can save the
document again with other settings.
I agree that this is important for
On 3/19/12 2:16 PM, TJ Frazier wrote:
On 3/19/2012 08:48, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
I think issue 119090 is no show stopper from my point of view. The new
default provides a better security than before when I understand it
correct. And if people detect potential problems they can save
Hi,
based on the analysis [1] of Andre and the feedback I got from Raphael,
Pavel, Claudio I would like to propose the following approach to bring
our AOO project on the Apache Pootle server into a well defined state.
Status: Raphael had set up the current project based on the backup data.
On 3/19/12 1:44 PM, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi Rob,
On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 08:11 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
We've discussed this all before, but to reiterate, the previous list
was a security list for a single open source project. It was hosted by
that open source project. I'm not seeing in what sense
Hi Ross,
On 3/19/12 4:03 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
I just had a call with Roberto from SourceForge in which he updated me
on what they've done with the templates and extensions sites. I asked
Roberto to send a summary to this list, but I just wanted to extend my
thanks to him and the team at
On 3/19/12 5:32 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
On 03/19/12 05:03, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
...
I see .. That testing is very important, thanks.
I guess I am rather worried that our first reviewer actually
thought he could trust us on the IP review. I suspect I have
also been the only looking
Am Montag, 19. März 2012 schrieb Torokhov Sergey torokhov_...@mail.ru:
See the Apache OpenOffice (Incubating) » svx / source / intro.po
(https://translate.apache.org/en_GB/OOo/svx/source/intro.po/translate/
for examle)
--
Copyright © 2000, 2011 Oracle and/or its affiliates. All
Hi,
I marked this issue as no show stopper because it is a minor build
problem only. As Ariel has analyzed it only occurs if you don't build
with a clean module. A simple dmake clean solve this problem.
I really don't see any of our criteria matching here.
Juergen
Hi,
please stop working on the pootle server for now. We are updating the
data to the latest resources for AOO 3.4. We will keep you informed when
the update is finished!
Note the project related news on the pootle server as well!
Existing translations should be preserved. But probably some
Hi,
excuse my top posting.
It is not yet clarified how or if we can ensure the translation from non
committers. You should have noticed that we at Apache take some things
more serious than others.
The easiest way is to get access to the language you want to translate
is to become a
On 3/20/12 11:33 PM, Risto Jääskeläinen wrote:
Raphael Bircher [r.birc...@gmx.ch] kirjoitti:
Hi at all
You can find the languages wich have aktive support at the moment on
Pootle
https://translate.apache.org/projects/OOo_34/
You can imediatly start with the rest of the translation.
Hi,
I thought we would be ready to start building a RC but I think we should
take the upcoming problems serious. And we should work on the RAT
cleanup first.
For that reason I would like to propose that we prepare a further
developer snapshot based on revision 1303343 (Last Changed Rev:
Hi,
the Pootle server is updated to the latest resource strings and a first
set of languages is provided. At least for the UI, help is in progress.
The available languages are the languages where we have already provided
developer snapshots, means languages where we got feedback so far. We
On 3/21/12 4:14 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Hi Jürgen, *
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 08:48:55AM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
excuse my top posting.
It is not yet clarified how or if we can ensure the translation from
non committers. You should have noticed that we at Apache take some
On 3/21/12 5:36 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Hi Jürgen,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 03:11:20PM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
the Pootle server is updated to the latest resource strings and a
first set of languages is provided. At least for the UI, help is in
progress. The available
On 3/21/12 11:28 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
I thought we would be ready to start building a RC but I think we should
take the upcoming problems serious. And we should work on the RAT
cleanup first.
For that reason I would like to propose that we prepare a further
developer snapshot based
On 3/22/12 5:30 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~pfg/images/AOO-powered.png
Doesn't it make you all want to use FreeBSD? ;).
to be honest Pedro, I don't like it ;-)
I would prefer you would simply use the original one extended with some
BSD specific stuff or so.
But I
On 3/21/12 8:38 AM, Shenfeng Liu wrote:
Hi, all,
I tried to update the Project Reporting wiki and added AOO 3.4 status.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Project+Reporting
My intention is to make a centralized place for people to get a big
picture on what's going on,
On 3/21/12 8:31 PM, FR web forum wrote:
French translation ready in a couple of weeks
But, we have some strings pending like:
basic.src#IDD_TT_ABOUT_DIALOG.4.fixedtext.text | ©1995-2010 Oracle
What to do with it?
©2012 Apache Software Foundation
it is probably a minor problem as it is not
On 3/21/12 11:55 PM, Claudio F Filho wrote:
Hi
Em 21-03-2012 11:11, Jürgen Schmidt escreveu:
2. Can we get a rough estimation when we can expect a 100% translation
2.1 for UI?
100%. I saw some strings that need attention only.
yes and it is already checked in, I have already mentioned
On 3/21/12 7:29 PM, Reizinger Zoltán wrote:
Hi,
My second question to translation:
The po file /basic/source/app.po contains strings to VCLTesttools. Why
it needs to be translated?
IIRC we decided not to use VCLTesttool in QA work, because we not want
to use it, and no one want to learn BASIC.
On 3/22/12 11:55 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
On 21.03.2012 16:13, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
I have setup a wiki page in order to provide/collect the status of the
translation of specific languages [1].
I also linked this wiki page from our AOO 3.4 Release Plan cwiki page
On 3/22/12 9:28 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Juergen Schmidt
jogischm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thursday, 22. March 2012 at 15:19, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
On 22.03.2012 13:51, Herbert Duerr wrote:
Please note that the install sets that fall out of a build
On 3/22/12 7:18 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
On 03/22/12 11:09, Herbert Duerr wrote:
As a quick note, I'd *love* to dive in and start doing some
coding on AOOo; it's just that I've no idea where in the
heck to start... :)
Additionally to what Pedro said I'd like to point to our Bugzilla at
401 - 500 of 1153 matches
Mail list logo
