Hi.
I think your md pages are SUPERwhat I suggested was an additional wiki
page (actually someone else called it postoffice) where we put small tasks
that need to be translated / written etc.
So I see your pages go hand in hand with Wiki pages, just too different
levels of interaction with
Hi
I have been searching for detailed internal information about how the build
process works with build and dmake (gnumake).
I have seen the relationship in the single directories (prj/build.lst
prj/d.lst and makefile.mk), but I cannot find a central makefile.
If I understand life, there should
+1, what can I say apart from I am still here, and I mean to stay with AOO
for a long time.
Jan.
On 1 November 2012 15:18, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
I'm hearing that some project volunteers, especially new ones, are
being contacted by certain external parties, who then try to
be happy to focus on localization together
with jürgen, but if it is something you want to do it yourself thats ok
with me.
Jan.
On 1 November 2012 16:55, Andre Fischer awf@gmail.com wrote:
On 30.10.2012 22:10, jan iversen wrote:
Just for info, Juergen told me that he was going to talk about
Please excuse me, I think I know the difference between hooligans and
people who are just blowing hot air.
To be honest, at the moment AOO does NOT have a great deal of momentum, and
have (I think) lost a quite a lot of reputation among developers. That is
something we have to remedy, not by
later, due to personal budget
restriction (dont we all have that) I cannot participate.
Jan.
On 1 November 2012 17:44, Andre Fischer awf@gmail.com wrote:
On 31.10.2012 22:20, jan iversen wrote:
Hi
I have been searching for detailed internal information about how the
build
process works
you See below please.
On 1 November 2012 18:18, Andre Fischer awf@gmail.com wrote:
On 01.11.2012 17:57, jan iversen wrote:
See below please.
THANKS for your VERY informative answer, it helped me a lot.
I was of the simple idea, that we pursued a simple build process made up
Clone URL (Committers only):
https://cms.apache.org/redirect?new=anonymous;action=diff;uri=http://ooo-site.apache.org/l10n-new%2Findex.mdtext
jan iversen
Index: trunk/content/l10n-new/index.mdtext
===
--- trunk/content/l10n-new
Clone URL (Committers only):
https://cms.apache.org/redirect?new=anonymous;action=diff;uri=http://ooo-site.apache.org/l10n-new%2Fleftnav.mdtext
jan iversen
Index: trunk/content/l10n-new/leftnav.mdtext
===
--- trunk/content/l10n-new
.
You are new here with lots of admirable energy and work! This is what
acquires merit in an Apache project!
Since we ultimately can only control ourselves, do you have any
suggestions about how we can more actively encourage participation?
Best Regards,
Dave
On Nov 1, 2012, at 9:38 AM, jan
Thanks for the note, however knowing IBM I had hoped that one of the
official goals was to help the development part of the community to get
stabilized.
I acknowledge that it is important for IBM to get an output of invested
energy/time/money, but I think IBM would benefit not only from features
) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 11/01/2012 01:17 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:52 AM, Jürgen Schmidtjogischm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 11/1/12 12:39 AM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 10/27/2012 01:17 AM, schrieb jan iversen:
I see, I have to get used to this license issues (a long
PM, jan iversen anonym...@apache.org wrote:
Clone URL (Committers only):
https://cms.apache.org/redirect?new=anonymous;action=diff;uri=http://ooo-site.apache.org/l10n-new%2Findex.mdtext
jan iversen
Index: trunk/content/l10n-new/index.mdtext
see below please.
On 1 November 2012 22:21, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 5:07 PM, jan iversen jancasacon...@gmail.com
wrote:
Can standard loosely be defined as an extension:
- is developed by people who have signed ICLA
- uses the apache license header
need to publish it.
but how come CMS is not updated...
jan.
On 1 November 2012 22:31, Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 10:11:05PM +0100, jan iversen wrote:
I do not ignore qualified input !!
I will just have to find a way of making a right-nav bar
Can someone please publish rightnav (that ariel committed) so I can edit it
with cms.
thanks in advance.
Jan.
On 1 November 2012 22:31, Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 10:11:05PM +0100, jan iversen wrote:
I do not ignore qualified input !!
I
Clone URL (Committers only):
https://cms.apache.org/redirect?new=anonymous;action=diff;uri=http://ooo-site.apache.org/l10n-new%2Ftopnav.mdtext
jan iversen
Index: trunk/content/l10n-new/topnav.mdtext
===
--- trunk/content/l10n-new
it with
l10n-new.
Jan.
On 2 November 2012 00:03, Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 11:36:20PM +0100, jan iversen wrote:
I would love to publish it myself, but I dont have the karma to do so (I
am
a contributor).
I have updated CMS, no luck !
I published
+1, it is a very intuitive page, and seems easy to link to passing project
etc.
jan
On 2 November 2012 02:40, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:52 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org
wrote:
On 30/10/2012 Guy Waterval wrote:
But for other people who will
iversen wrote:
you See below please.
On 1 November 2012 18:18, Andre Fischer awf@gmail.com wrote:
On 01.11.2012 17:57, jan iversen wrote:
See below please.
THANKS for your VERY informative answer, it helped me a lot.
I was of the simple idea, that we pursued a simple build process
+1 to your ideas, much better formulated than mine.
see below for comments.
Jan
On 2 November 2012 12:09, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 11/01/2012 10:07 PM, schrieb jan iversen:
Can standard loosely be defined as an extension:
- is developed by people who have signed ICLA
On 2 November 2012 17:54, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
On 01/11/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 4:21 PM, jan iversen wrote:
- We need to focus more on people who want to help, instead of using all
the legal stuff (which are necessary) as a buffer not to move things
On 2 November 2012 22:31, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Nov 2, 2012, at 2:12 PM, jan iversen wrote:
On 2 November 2012 17:54, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
On 01/11/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 4:21 PM, jan iversen wrote:
- We need
Thanks.
On 2 November 2012 23:36, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jan--
This change in now in production.
On 11/02/2012 01:33 AM, jan iversen wrote:
Clone URL (Committers only):
https://cms.apache.org/**redirect?new=anonymous;action=**
diff;uri=http://ooo-site.**apache.org
May I politely as a mathematician point out that there is a major
difference in the 2 proposals.
Number 1 is a mathematical expression whereas number 2 is a number.
Now I do not know where it is used, but if I copy both suggestions into
Calc, it believes it is text.
Should we not have a format
ups, our calc does not like . if it is setup for e.g. en-GB, so actually
calc accepted the second notation if I changed it to ,
Would it be possible to have a macro or something for . so it appears in
, for me . signals 1000 (1.000)
Jan.
On 3 November 2012 18:29, Dennis E. Hamilton
rgb.m...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/11/3 jan iversen jancasacon...@gmail.com
May I politely as a mathematician point out that there is a major
difference in the 2 proposals.
Number 1 is a mathematical expression whereas number 2 is a number.
I'm physicist :)
The first number
101 - 127 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
