[restoring Cc to libreoffice dev list]
The draw:angle attribute has the date type integer. A value of n is
interpreted as n*0.1 degrees.
Sorry, I would not do that. This would limit the possible precision
without needs in a format definition.
Tend to agree. Keep the double type, but define
Herbert Duerr wrote:
I also suggest to mention the issue tracker when referring to an
issue number. In the history of the OOo project there were already
three different bug-trackers were used. E.g. issuetracker that has
been migrated to our bugzilla instance was referred to by the 'i'
before
Andre Fischer wrote:
Yes, as well as a higher code quality.
Metrics please, or didn't happen! ;)
Cheers from the off,
-- Thorsten
pgpGf0wXp2F6G.pgp
Description: PGP signature
eric wrote:
Unfortunaly, LibreOffice developers who did the commits, did not put
my real name as author.
Complaints to svn please -
e.g. http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1195273
Beyond that, thanks for the fixes of course.
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
pgp8jrSk8msmo.pgp
Pedro Giffuni wrote:
AGG stays. It's used here:
canvas/source/tools/canvastools.flt
canvas/source/tools/image.cxx
image.cxx is dead code as well. both can go, with agg.
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
pgpRpxR25jtd3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I agree it needs to be addressed. What is ironic is that this
discussion did NOT result in a breakdown of B at all, but
rather a breakdown in another entity also not having a policy
in place in sharing info with other community members.
Hi Jim,
since this is ambiguous
Dave Fisher wrote:
I may remind you that, at the point
of responsible disclosure to securityteam@ooo, the
ooo-security@apache list was still in the process of being
setup/populated, and there was an ongoing policy discussion here.
When that discussion was settled it seems someone on the
Hi Jürgen,
first off, glad to hear you stay with our code the ecosystem! :)
Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
From my point of view the reasons for the fork are not longer
valid and it should be possible to continue one project, one
office together.
I don't believe it's helpful to start a discussion by
Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
It is still early enough to reunify the code base and use the well
known brand OpenOffice for a binary release. It would be the best
choice for our users.
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but binary releases bearing that
name can only be made by the ASF, or can
TJ Frazier wrote:
Absent information to the contrary, it is entirely reasonable to
assume that the authors were Sun/Oracle employees, doing their
jobs.
That is not accurate. For example the German pages have been
(mostly) under the curation of the German volunteer community.
Whether
eric wrote:
educoo.us and educoo.de are .. I'd say not correctly maintained
(because owned by pro-LO people).
nonsense. educoo.de points to your servers, you're free to post
whatever content you desire there (yes, I've read Florian's and your
answer to this).
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
I am going to operate from the assumption that it is not
appropriate to cherry-pick the OOo Apache Extra into the Apache
SVN in any manner, although that code base can certainly be used
consistent with the license already applied to it.
Does anyone recognize a
Mathias Bauer wrote:
Do we really want to have code in the svn repo that will never be used?
The alternative would be to add cws to svn only after review.
A somewhat related question would be, until when will the Oracle
offer to extend the source code grant last? Since work done by
Oracle
Ross Gardler wrote:
At present the only way I can see to start doing this is to a) drop
the ego on both sides, this is a different world from the one in
which the fork was seen as necessary. There are still fundamental
licence differences, but I am sure that, for many, the licence is less
14 matches
Mail list logo
